Mafiascum.net

In post 513, flow trap wrote:Were your eyes in someone else's head or something?

In post 522, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 512, Green Crayons wrote:my eyes just fell out of their head

Your eyes have their own head?

???

doesn't everyone loan out their eyes?

In post 517, MiniVirgo wrote:Also I fucking can't stand them as a person so there's that.

ty

now this is nai

DK, my sympathies

In post 528, Lukewarm wrote:VOTE: MiniVirgo

Their response to koba was .

I have a scum lean on Mini at this point anyways, but even if they are not scum, I do not want to play a game with someone who is gonna talk to other players the way they just did.

So a vote for them is a win-win in my book.

That is not helping

In post 529, Lukewarm wrote:Their response to koba was insane.

It was uncalled for and needs to stop but let's not play it off as 'insane' or something that needs prodding at for 5 more pages.

lets flip within flow/mini

Nu

2 options bad

Also shooting Flow day 1 is bad

im mostly seeing and prodding PoE suggestions to see where we go - i am definitely set atm on those 2 options rn - but I could be swayed with a proper argument elsewhere but generally I think I've found when I box into a low number of names earlier on I find more success as town in creating a "solve state" where the info to solve the game is able to be discern based on the movement around it.

gamestate manipulation is my favorite part of the game

In post 537, DkKoba wrote:gamestate manipulation is my favorite part of the game

I agree which I why I don like having 2 canadites

Nor do I think perpetuating DK vs Mini is a good idea

why is mini town lol

I didn't say that

ok what is ur read there then

I refuse to state

In post 542, DkKoba wrote:ok what is ur read there then

In post 543, flow trap wrote:I refuse to state

????

In post 444, MiniVirgo wrote:

In post 310, Save The Dragons wrote:UNVOTE: minivirgo wanna give this game a good think in the morning

May I ask why you unvoted here? You said you'd give it a good think so you should have an answer by the time you get back

- JV

this game is confusing me and is hard to get into. i almost never unvote but i really wanted to clear my head and try to look at it from a fresher perspective.

In post 515, MiniVirgo wrote:

In post 505, VFP wrote:@Mini give yourself an unvote, give me 3 names and I'll tell you exactly where I have them and why.

I shouldn't have to push and prod this much for your reads at all

- JV

After all the work you put in to get VFP's reads, they finally offer to break down their reads on 3 players and you didn't take them up on it?

In post 458, MiniVirgo wrote:

In post 399, Save The Dragons wrote:let's unpack this

i didn't say "it IS an OMGUS, therefore scum." just that it makes me wary.

besides that, it looks like VFP has reads on people who aren't you, so I'm not sure your second part applies?

You say it's OMGUS and that makes you uncomfortable, and then vote me in the next few posts and you seriously expect me to assume that you mean that it's OMGUS which is seperate from the reason I am voting you because I think you're scum.

- JV

sorry. maybe i need more coffee because i'm not parsing

i said it was basically an OMGUS and that it bothered me. it is part of the reason i'm voting you, yes. i'm just pointing out i didn't say OMGUS = scum which you implied with your "OMGUS != scum" part of your post.

happy with my vote

In post 546, Lukewarm wrote:After all the work you put in to get VFP's reads, they finally offer to break down their reads on 3 players and you didn't take them up on it?

How is asking the same question 3 or 4 times considered as all of that work?