Posted: Sun May 02, 2021 1:09 pm
And you call be conf-biasedIn post 528, RationalMadman wrote:Says doc claim rather than Doc.
Says Doc rather than Doctor (Doc would be howbthey chatted in scumchat about the idea, not Doctor but reading a role PM and tellimg it would feel serious, she'd say Doctor)
After it tunnels antone votimg her, now outs a townread on the person she is wanting town to bandwagon
EditedIn post 529, JacksonVirgo wrote:And you call me conf-biasedIn post 528, RationalMadman wrote:Says doc claim rather than Doc.
Says Doc rather than Doctor (Doc would be howbthey chatted in scumchat about the idea, not Doctor but reading a role PM and tellimg it would feel serious, she'd say Doctor)
After it tunnels antone votimg her, now outs a townread on the person she is wanting town to bandwagon
Is this a slip?In post 522, orctin wrote:scum can decide to eliminate Rational tonight just to make the game thread less aggressive (and we probably would all shoot him if we could, lets be honest) - and we carry on the next day
What are you saying.In post 532, RationalMadman wrote:Whatever poor soul would shoot someone as useful to Town as me is hilarious. Hope that you vote Andante and then them (just kidding this game has no gun).
You haven't been useful, you've been antagonistic the whole game, basically playing as if this is a one man game and the rest of us are along for the rideIn post 532, RationalMadman wrote:Whatever poor soul would shoot someone as useful to Town as me is hilarious. Hope that you vote Andante and then them (just kidding this game has no gun).
where i play used to mafia shooting people as their night action - no idea how it's worded here, if i see different then i will word differentIn post 531, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is this a slip?In post 522, orctin wrote:scum can decide to eliminate Rational tonight just to make the game thread less aggressive (and we probably would all shoot him if we could, lets be honest) - and we carry on the next day
From everyone's perspective that is the case. What is your one man ride doing? Why are you voting nobody?In post 536, orctin wrote:You haven't been useful, you've been antagonistic the whole game, basically playing as if this is a one man game and the rest of us are along for the ride
After backing of the vote on you just cause i disliked your playstyle i'm waiting for a reason to vote - hoping to find something more logical than "they scum read me" or "you wont answer me" - or what ever else some quick votes have been based on so far. Plus i was out for couple days so been reading back and letting the couple days allow me some fresh perspective there.In post 538, RationalMadman wrote:From everyone's perspective that is the case. What is your one man ride doing? Why are you voting nobody?In post 536, orctin wrote:You haven't been useful, you've been antagonistic the whole game, basically playing as if this is a one man game and the rest of us are along for the ride
You are seriously obsessed with the scum NK. Why would that beIn post 539, orctin wrote:i think at this point even if Rathe isn't eliminated Day 1 scum will have hard time not night killing them the coming night
afaik just "eliminate" is used here, or "attack"In post 537, orctin wrote:where i play used to mafia shooting people as their night action - no idea how it's worded here, if i see different then i will word differentIn post 531, JacksonVirgo wrote:Is this a slip?In post 522, orctin wrote:scum can decide to eliminate Rational tonight just to make the game thread less aggressive (and we probably would all shoot him if we could, lets be honest) - and we carry on the next day
Andante claimed Doctor.In post 546, VFP wrote:Hi all!
Does anyone have an update while I read up properly?
I saw juicy claims I think!
In post 319, Andante wrote:whatever, I'm claiming, I'm the doctor, I'm literally dead tonight, so go find scum. thanks. I'm actually getting annoyed by the nonstop pushing on me from you
In post 327, RationalMadman wrote:But I am willing to vote this through to elimination without Rathe outing if everyone agrees Rathe is strobgly implying something here.
Okay, first of all, we never lim the doc claim D1 without any sort of CC.In post 331, RationalMadman wrote:I don't say I'm not a PR that rules Doc out. I say I am not Doc, just so we are crystal clear what I am claiming. Hypothetically, I am a PR who Pr-reads Rathe here.
Unlucky for them we aren't going to lim the Doc claim.In post 547, JacksonVirgo wrote:Andante claimed Doctor.
Rational and Rathe both want to wagon them anyway and make Town not cc if there is one.
It's been a general 2v2 attack from Rational/Rathe and myself and Andante. With us trying to explain how stupid it is to not ask for ccs here.
Rational basically choosing to fall into confbias while telling everyone else it's confbias that they are not wagoning Andante. I say plenty of logic as to why ccing here is the best play, why Andante is likely town etc but they choose to actively ignore that every single time.