Mafiascum.net

I'm not seeing reasons to say James is acting "super scummy" at all. More that I don't really have reasons to come down on the town side either. He picked up some of the reasons I was finding Nancy scummy, and if he did so independently, then that says town, but he could have just read them straight off my post and noticed it had been ignored up to then and gone with it, so I can't say either way. In short, right now the slot is still null to me.

I do have to entertain the fact he is scum, waiting for a scummy buddy to come and tell him if he should fake claim here or not, which is why he is dodging it, and that, combined with his flip perhaps telling something about Nancy means I'm not adverse to dropping the hammer myself here, if it comes to it.

Simultaneous posting be like...

Anyone else got something to say about that claim?

In post 524, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 522, Val89 wrote:Third and final time, James. We need a claim.

Intent to hammer

Really don't want to do this.
I'm the Doctor.

Did you crumb?

In post 527, T3 wrote:

In post 524, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 522, Val89 wrote:Third and final time, James. We need a claim.

Intent to hammer

Really don't want to do this.
I'm the Doctor.

Did you crumb?

Why would I crumb Doctor? Plus it would have been too late even if I wanted to, I replaced in too late.

UNVOTE:

aw man
ok gimme a moment to remember what newbie setups are

VOTE: JamesTheNames

I think I'm pretty sure JTN is scum. To keep setup ambiguous from scum for at least one night longer, someone should go ahead and hammer.

In post 530, Psyche wrote:VOTE: JamesTheNames

I think I'm pretty sure JTN is scum. To keep setup ambiguous from scum for at least one night longer, someone should go ahead and hammer.

Come again? There'd only be an issue if somebody just out and claimed Cop or Tracker, the game is no longer ambiguous. Why are you blindly rushing a hammer instead of waiting to see nobody has issues with my claim?

VOTE: James
Okay.

You could have just waited to see that nobody was going to counter claim me, why would scum counter claim day 1? Nevermind I guess.

In post 530, Psyche wrote:To keep setup ambiguous from scum for at least one night longer, someone should go ahead and hammer.

Bullshit. Absolute bullshit.

Unless James is fake claiming, scum are the only one with the exception of the other PR who KNOW the setup, since doctor only appears once in each of column A and B. If they have a rolecop or roleblocker solves the setup completely for them.

No way Psyche didn't know that. Get this obvscum outta here, we can sort Nancy for sure tomorrow.

VOTE: Pysche

Aren't I hammered why are you still voting?

hehe probably unwise to pull gambits in newbies but i felt like a betting man today
we'll work these nicks out tomorrow val my guy

Oh, T3 was already on the wagon.

Okay I'll be clear. I have a role that makes James's claim impossible. I don't want to elaborate further. Do I have to?

>:)
Bye bye James.

No, I think I've figured it.

UNVOTE:

Let me get on my computer so I can read through the vote count properly before I make any hasty decisions, but yeah, bye bye James, probably.

In post 536, Psyche wrote:hehe probably unwise to pull gambits in newbies but i felt like a betting man today
we'll work these nicks out tomorrow val my guy

What does this even mean? It's only a gambit if you're faking something.

a rose by any other name is just as sweet

I'm going to be mislimmed anyway so I suppose there's no point in hiding it,

In post 13, T3 wrote:I'll definitely be tracking where this game goes.

. T3 bread crumbed Tracker, it's clear he isn't a tracker now, because he'd know both Tracker/Doctor and Tracker/Jailkeeper were options. Psycho isn't claiming a mason there were no mason crumbs, it's clear he's trying to claim Jailkeeper. So why would T3 as town fake claim tracker if not to use it later on in the game as a scum claim. Psyche and T3 are a scum pair. T3 was planning on fake claiming Tracker late game. Meaning we're in Row B, considering Psyche is pretending to be jailkeeper.

I mean to say Column B ^.

In post 527, T3 wrote:

In post 524, JamesTheNames wrote:

In post 522, Val89 wrote:Third and final time, James. We need a claim.

Intent to hammer

Really don't want to do this.
I'm the Doctor.

Did you crumb?

If you assume T3 was going to fake claim tracker, this delay to make sure makes sense. Once they saw Val89 realise my claim was true, they made one of them claim Jailkeeper, because they realised it wouldn't be a quick hammer.

posts like the above are just frantically fishing for information and people shouldn't engage with them. plenty of time to do that D2 if you still feel it's pertinent.

In post 542, JamesTheNames wrote:Psycho isn't claiming a mason there were no mason crumbs

Pyscho can't be mason because there were no crumbs?

Nah, mate, couldn't be Mason because you are apparently the Doc.

VOTE: JamesTheNames

Erm... I am tracker.

Sorry for the misname there, Psyche. Wasn't deliberate. A freudian slip, perhaps

it totally was a gambit though im sry val89 wait does that mean you're like 32 or do you perhaps really dig taylor swift's hit album of the same name or maybe even that one smashing pumpkins song