Page 22 of 217

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:44 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 520, unwnd wrote:It means that Toog has put themselves in a position where actions will resolve them, given they've already hinted to what they are. No, they didn't state a power or anything like that, and I'm well aware it's role madness upick. However, the moment you hint you can do something is the moment I expect something, meaning I can get a read out of it.
What happens when we wagon ssbm and they indicate that they can do something?

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:46 pm
by unwnd
Toog's reaction wouldn't be the same as Kyouko

It's not that they claimed a role, rather the way they did it

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:48 pm
by Dunnstral
I don't see toog saying their role is confirmable as towny

Scum can have confirmable roles

And it already feels like town may have a few confirmable roles

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 4:56 pm
by DrippingGoofball
In post 524, Dunnstral wrote:You're the one person who called him town.
AS A JOKE :giggle:

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:02 pm
by Kate Bishop
VOTE: ssbm_Kyouko

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:03 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 522, Dunnstral wrote:I'll actually go ahead and say that it doesn't feel like there is a lot of AI stuff from Kate Bishop until they start talking about SSBM and posting reads

Or at least, not that I understand, but 1 on 1 interaction is different from general thread interaction
If you form gestalt reads, you've got one hell of a gestalt coming.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:05 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 307, Toogeloo wrote:
In post 269, GuyInFreezer wrote:For what reason would scum fakeclaim that role?
Well, there a couple things that come to mind, I think first and foremost is that there might be a benefit to being the person on the scum team that makes all the night kills.

I'm not even committed to calling LLD scum, and it hadn't even crossed my mind. And to be perfectly honest, I don't care. I was 100% more interested in the people town binning LLD like she just claimed Innocent Child. But LLD's response to my post that wasn't even directed at her has definitely intrigued me. LLD is a highly prolific player and not above gambits. I simply err on the side of caution with those types.
This post and the explanations that came from it bothers me. It really doesn't seem like Toog was interested in solving other people, and when asked was only able to name Unwnd, though they worded it like there was multiple people.

Their stance on LLD ranges from trying to seem neutral to not being 'commited' to calling them scum.

Then they grandstanded about how they were looking forward to being wagoned in , but then in gives very mild thoughts about their own wagon, and the explanation when pressed in is still vague and not compelling.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:01 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 521, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 515, Kate Bishop wrote:{Dunn.......Cabd, GIF}
{Rhiannon, DGB(?)} DGB feels right on this tier but it's not as solid other reads to this point
{Wheme, marci.......manatee} niggles about manatee's role, but eh
{Unwnd} true null
{Luke}
{ssbm, Toog(?)}

---------------------

This is synced, but my reads are awfully fluid.

Toog's in flux. I feel like he's doing AI stuff now, maybe? Most of his posts from that LLD sus onward haven't sat right. I have a feeling Nacho would tell me this is town toog, but I never totally nailed down what makes town toog town to Nacho.

Maybe ssbm is where I'll want to vote.
[LLD, Cabd, Kate Bishop]
[Manatee, Unwnd, GIF, Marci]
[Wheme, Luke, DGB]
[SSBM, Toog]

With the caveat that I don't think anyone in the top tier is super far out of scum range, these are early feelings mainly based on tone and claims.
Cautiously putting Unwnd and Marci above null for unexplained reasons

I don't have any sort of feeling about Wheme//Luke right now, so they're at null

I didn't like the SSBM pop-in and only talking about the claims
Toog claiming to be confirmable doesn't do anything for me.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:07 pm
by Dunnstral
Is that you telling me to move to ssbm?

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:08 pm
by Kate Bishop
ok that's bizarre. site did one of those time-out things and a post I was quoting to reply to got posted.

Anyway

@Dunn I don't really have issues with where we don't fully line up. Wheme would probably be null to me given his posts so far. notsci sees town-wheme, though. If that read becomes important he can expound, or more data may make my read more emphatically town than it currently is.

I feel like scum-DGB might think twice about antagonizing us to the degree it could have if I'd been feeling prickly today.

Elsewhere, it's close enough for rock n roll.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:10 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 533, Dunnstral wrote:Is that you telling me to move to ssbm?
Nope. I'm still figuring out how I feel about toog. I don't disagree with your analysis of his posts.

Aside from Yggdrasil, I haven't played with him in years. It was a Sangres game so I got to depend on Nacho's read of him and was happy to do so.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:10 pm
by GuyInFreezer
In post 307, Toogeloo wrote:
In post 269, GuyInFreezer wrote:For what reason would scum fakeclaim that role?
Well, there a couple things that come to mind, I think first and foremost is that there might be a benefit to being the person on the scum team that makes all the night kills.

I'm not even committed to calling LLD scum, and it hadn't even crossed my mind. And to be perfectly honest, I don't care. I was 100% more interested in the people town binning LLD like she just claimed Innocent Child. But LLD's response to my post that wasn't even directed at her has definitely intrigued me. LLD is a highly prolific player and not above gambits. I simply err on the side of caution with those types.
Wow how did I miss this post
I thought the whole time he skipped my question

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:13 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 535, Kate Bishop wrote:It was a Sangres game so I got to depend on Nacho's read of him and was happy to do so.
this isn't as clear as I thought on reread. the only game besides Yggdrasil I recall playing with toog was a Sangres game in 2014-ish.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:21 pm
by GuyInFreezer
UNVOTE:

Given that that was p much the major reason and the answer given is p null

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:23 pm
by Dunnstral
This might be the first game I've played with Toogeloo where they didn't immediately claim their role

They did it in Yggdrasil and in two treestump vs games where they were vt and claimed it immediately (so they claimed even when there was no tactical advantage to do so)

I believe they were town in all of those games, which is why their opener here pinged me, since it implies that either they are changing things up, or they have a role that shouldn't be claimed. Arguable that didn't stop them in Yggdrasil when they were town so it leans towards being a scum role that they shouldn't claim/were told not to claim.

That's not the reason I'm voting them right now as I feel there's more info but it is along the lines of what I was thinking when I voted. They already explained that they were busy with packing which explains the lack of doing stuff early that I noticed.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:23 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 538, GuyInFreezer wrote:UNVOTE:

Given that that was p much the major reason and the answer given is p null
?

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:24 pm
by unwnd
In post 527, Dunnstral wrote:I don't see toog saying their role is confirmable as towny

Scum can have confirmable roles

And it already feels like town may have a few confirmable roles
That is not why I felt they weren't scummy

I think I've said this before but If I townread someone I will tell you, being 'not scummy' does not mean you instantly shoot up on my list

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:28 pm
by GuyInFreezer
In post 540, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 538, GuyInFreezer wrote:UNVOTE:

Given that that was p much the major reason and the answer given is p null
?
Like I don’t think his explanation is town
But I think it’s null (and not too unreasonable) for someone to be wary of getting schooled.
From what I picked up there he didn’t throw in suspicion not because of the role but because it was LLD who claimed the role.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:40 pm
by GuyInFreezer
In post 515, Kate Bishop wrote:{Dunn.......Cabd, GIF}
{Rhiannon, DGB(?)} DGB feels right on this tier but it's not as solid other reads to this point
{Wheme, marci.......manatee} niggles about manatee's role, but eh
{Unwnd} true null
{Luke}
{ssbm, Toog(?)}

---------------------

This is synced, but my reads are awfully fluid.

Toog's in flux. I feel like he's doing AI stuff now, maybe? Most of his posts from that LLD sus onward haven't sat right. I have a feeling Nacho would tell me this is town toog, but I never totally nailed down what makes town toog town to Nacho.

Maybe ssbm is where I'll want to vote.
I didn’t expect getting that high on the list lol
And here I thought I was doing a decent job staying in more null zone

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:42 pm
by DrippingGoofball
GiF can be town.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:43 pm
by Dunnstral
What would scum GiF look like?

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:45 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 543, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 515, Kate Bishop wrote:{Dunn.......Cabd, GIF}
{Rhiannon, DGB(?)} DGB feels right on this tier but it's not as solid other reads to this point
{Wheme, marci.......manatee} niggles about manatee's role, but eh
{Unwnd} true null
{Luke}
{ssbm, Toog(?)}

---------------------

This is synced, but my reads are awfully fluid.

Toog's in flux. I feel like he's doing AI stuff now, maybe? Most of his posts from that LLD sus onward haven't sat right. I have a feeling Nacho would tell me this is town toog, but I never totally nailed down what makes town toog town to Nacho.

Maybe ssbm is where I'll want to vote.
I didn’t expect getting that high on the list lol
And here I thought I was doing a decent job staying in more null zone
Spoiler:
Subject: Micro 719: For Us [Endgame]
morph the cat wrote:
Image


Page 6. Not my best.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:45 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 545, Dunnstral wrote:What would scum GiF look like?
cute and fluffy.

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:47 pm
by Dunnstral
So he's too ugly to be scum?

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 6:50 pm
by Kate Bishop
In post 548, Dunnstral wrote:So he's too ugly to be scum?
I can't tell you all my gif-read secrets when he's listening.

He's more serious and squinty-eyed as scum.

And his observations make more sense.