Mafiascum.net

In post 503, marcistar wrote:

In post 500, HockeyFan wrote:sorry im cranky rn lol

its fine. this might be useful in the future.

In post 502, superbowl9 wrote:DW im good at defending my sheeps I think they have a 0% death rate

s-suddenly..

g-guys... help...... im becoming.... a SHEEP!

In post 506, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 452, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 440, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I’m gonna take the rest of the day off from this game
I don’t feel in a good headspace rn

Feel better soon gamma!

Thanks
FYI I at least don’t have to worry about the thing that was messing with my head anymore

In post 507, Roden wrote:

In post 488, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 476, Roden wrote:Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

In post 528, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 507, Roden wrote:

In post 488, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 476, Roden wrote:Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

In post 529, Roden wrote:

In post 528, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 507, Roden wrote:

In post 488, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 476, Roden wrote:Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.

In post 530, HockeyFan wrote:ooga booga this game is hard

In post 333, marcistar wrote:hmm

In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

In post 436, T3 wrote:

In post 426, Galron wrote:

In post 325, T3 wrote:

In post 270, DrippingGoofball wrote:Galron is town.

In post 271, DrippingGoofball wrote:ROden is town.

In post 272, DrippingGoofball wrote:Gamma is town.

In post 273, DrippingGoofball wrote:Gmo... prob town.

These posts are all towny by DGB meta but I've metadived her before so she could be deliberately changing her play?

It's dgb being dgb. NAI really.

...have you seen scum DGB?

In post 438, T3 wrote:Town DGB:
Throws out unexplained blanket townreads
Throws out not thought out scumreads usually based on one post
Scum DGB:
Overexplains townreads
Rarely scumreads people

Citations: All of DGB's games since October 2020

In post 475, Roden wrote:

In post 471, T3 wrote:In what way is she similar?

Her questioning is pretty aggressive and her insistence on vibes over meta is consistent with her town play. I think she plays a lot more passively and meekly as scum, but I'm terrible at meta so she'd be worth a second look/meta dive IMO.

In post 536, Galron wrote:

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I don't hardcore think he did, but I'm not tr him for it. (I know this wasn't my question but I anticipate kop answered it)

In post 489, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 487, HockeyFan wrote:im feeling good about the ppl who just talked lately(T3,Roden,Marci). Not hard trs on any of them but the vibe feels right.

Why? I peg at least 1 scum in the 3 of em

In post 490, HockeyFan wrote:

superbowl9 wrote:

In post 487, HockeyFan wrote:im feeling good about the ppl who just talked lately(T3,Roden,Marci). Not hard trs on any of them but the vibe feels right.

Why? I peg at least 1 scum in the 3 of em

I mean you're probably right but T3 is town because I like his content. Roden's progression on reads/reasoning for them seems solid. Marci because of tonal/vibes. Who do u think is the scum?

In post 492, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 491, marcistar wrote:

In post 490, HockeyFan wrote:

superbowl9 wrote:

In post 487, HockeyFan wrote:im feeling good about the ppl who just talked lately(T3,Roden,Marci). Not hard trs on any of them but the vibe feels right.

Why? I peg at least 1 scum in the 3 of em

I mean you're probably right but T3 is town because I like his content. Roden's progression on reads/reasoning for them seems solid. Marci because of tonal/vibes. Who do u think is the scum?

dont like how ur leaving room to warp

SHOCKER!!! I AM SEMI- AGREEING WITH ONE OF MY TR'S SO SUS!!! tf do u mean leaving to warp lol. how is town reading 3 ppl leaving room to warp

In post 504, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 448, HockeyFan wrote:I liked content from 445, plus nothing feels off about your tonal/vibes rn

Marci isn’t screaming scum but she feels somewhat different from OMB

In post 512, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 470, Roden wrote:Marci playing similar to how she did in 2223 makes me feel better about her questioning.

I’ll trust u on this

In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 511, marcistar wrote:

In post 504, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 448, HockeyFan wrote:I liked content from 445, plus nothing feels off about your tonal/vibes rn

Marci isn’t screaming scum but she feels somewhat different from OMB

different how

You feel a little less engaged ig

In post 529, Roden wrote:

In post 528, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 507, Roden wrote:

In post 488, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 476, Roden wrote:Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.

In post 529, Roden wrote:

In post 528, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 507, Roden wrote:

In post 488, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 476, Roden wrote:Anyone against running up Grandpa? They feel subdued and cautious, and normally would've been scum read by now.

Me, especially because you went from saying scum is passive to suggesting the one player who's actually had a confrontation

I said majority scum is passive, and Grandpa's play so far has been relatively passive anyway.

So who's being active to you if not Grandpa???? Also the other half of this is bs because you tacitly agree to the premise that you should be hunting within lower activity slots in 468 so don't try to worm out from that now

I didn't say anything about hunting within lower activity slots lol. Don't put words in my mouth.

Passive =/= lower activity and you should know the difference.