Mafiascum.net

In post 484, SCP 999 wrote:Ok this is a random question for everyone : but who feels that Roden has flown really hard under the radar?

I'll +1 this

In post 498, Roden wrote:Cakes I just wanna know what exactly you didn't like about my post. Because I'm constantly getting scum read as town for calling out bad town plays and getting frustrated with town in general. If you say "vibes" I'm just ignoring you, give an actual reason.

what post are you referring to here?

498 is not really great in general. A lot of words that don't really say much - barely any real stances taken.

In post 520, Infinity Zero wrote:

In post 464, SirCakez wrote:why?

it looks like you're throwing out suspicions and seeing what sticks

-Gamma

i've sussed 4 people - that's pretty reasonable for a mini theme with no scum dead...

In post 514, SCP 999 wrote:mmmmmmmmmmm

at this point im thinking like -

yeah.

zyla/infinity has 1 scum. that's SvT.


Idk im fucking like trying to restructure my reads bc i started feeling like everyone was towny and it was fucking with me.



bleh

If you force through zyla and she flips green will you let us flip infinity

In post 527, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 514, SCP 999 wrote:mmmmmmmmmmm

at this point im thinking like -

yeah.

zyla/infinity has 1 scum. that's SvT.


Idk im fucking like trying to restructure my reads bc i started feeling like everyone was towny and it was fucking with me.



bleh

If you force through zyla and she flips green will you let us flip infinity

What makes you think I have the support to force anything through?

mmmm


my brain also doesn't completely hate an infinity/zyla/roden solve

let me multiiso and I will report how i feel after.

You're loud and I've seen you force lims before. No reason to think this game would be different

infinity could reasonably swap out for someone else on my first impression reading through

oh fuck.

i think i got it.

but i want to make sure at least 1 of my main solve flips red before I poison the thread with my ideas in case theyre wrong LOL

blessed invincible role

also ill give a hint: its a world where all of cakez, infinity, and LLD are town

what if we lawn mow Roden and Zyla and then if they are both town we kill Koba

i'd prob just selfvote out of embarassment at that point tbh


but i wouldn't just plow both without reevalling in between.

(in your scenario)

In post 525, SirCakez wrote:

In post 484, SCP 999 wrote:Ok this is a random question for everyone : but who feels that Roden has flown really hard under the radar?

I'll +1 this

In post 498, Roden wrote:Cakes I just wanna know what exactly you didn't like about my post. Because I'm constantly getting scum read as town for calling out bad town plays and getting frustrated with town in general. If you say "vibes" I'm just ignoring you, give an actual reason.

what post are you referring to here?

498 is not really great in general. A lot of words that don't really say much - barely any real stances taken.

In post 295, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: roden
don't like 125

This one.

Also not sure how you think 498 didn't say much and barely has any real stances, I gave stances and reads on more than half the players still in the game lol. I also already gave my takes earlier on Lady and Dunn (they're most likely town), and I've said all I can wrt Ampharos.

The only one I haven't had a single thing to say about yet is Galron actually, and if you were actually suspicious of me I think that might be something worth bringing up! Instead, I think you're not really paying attention and your push on me is transparently weak.

FTR I haven't said anything about Galron yet because he sits in the same read pool as Dwlee. His tone is generally easy to read as scummy and is ultimately NAI. Dwlee has slightly more obvious tells while Galron just needs time to simmer.

In post 529, SCP 999 wrote:mmmm


my brain also doesn't completely hate an infinity/zyla/roden solve

This is a lazy solve. If you have too many town reads and you're town, the scum team has at least one deep wolf. The scum team is almost never a "bottom three least townie" combination, especially when scum just got away with the easiest Day 1 mis-elim possible.

In post 540, Roden wrote:

In post 529, SCP 999 wrote:mmmm


my brain also doesn't completely hate an infinity/zyla/roden solve

This is a lazy solve. If you have too many town reads and you're town, the scum team has at least one deep wolf. The scum team is almost never a "bottom three least townie" combination, especially when scum just got away with the easiest Day 1 mis-elim possible.

I already moved past this thought please keep reading

I don't need to attack who I think the deepscum is because they cannot remove me from the game unless they find support for an elimination - that is all.

In post 540, Roden wrote:

In post 529, SCP 999 wrote:mmmm


my brain also doesn't completely hate an infinity/zyla/roden solve

This is a lazy solve. If you have too many town reads and you're town, the scum team has at least one deep wolf. The scum team is almost never a "bottom three least townie" combination, especially when scum just got away with the easiest Day 1 mis-elim possible.

By this I mean that no scum team wastes the opportunity presented by an easy info-less Day 1 by playing as a collective dead fish Day 2.

In post 541, SCP 999 wrote:

In post 540, Roden wrote:

In post 529, SCP 999 wrote:mmmm


my brain also doesn't completely hate an infinity/zyla/roden solve

This is a lazy solve. If you have too many town reads and you're town, the scum team has at least one deep wolf. The scum team is almost never a "bottom three least townie" combination, especially when scum just got away with the easiest Day 1 mis-elim possible.

I already moved past this thought please keep reading

I was too late but my point still stands.

mmmmmmmph

VOTE: zyla

In post 541, SCP 999 wrote:I already moved past this thought please keep reading

I don't particularly like this. Past thoughts aren't unimportant later. They don't disappear, and needn't be dismissed
It's not like they aren't useful in determining current motives just because they aren't current themselves

now we're really nitpicking huh

In post 546, Zyla wrote:

In post 541, SCP 999 wrote:I already moved past this thought please keep reading

I don't particularly like this. Past thoughts aren't unimportant later. They don't disappear, and needn't be dismissed
It's not like they aren't useful in determining current motives just because they aren't current themselves

ok so whats your conclusion on that thought then and why is it important

In post 548, SCP 999 wrote:ok so whats your conclusion on that thought then and why is it important

I don't dislike Roden's point, but I don't know that it isn't unimportant either.
I haven't made up my mind on you yet, but your not acknowledging past comments doesn't suggest that your goals are aligned with the foundation.