Mafiascum.net

In post 512, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 497, House wrote:

In post 472, T3 wrote:I hate dwlee's posts but I also always hate his posts

In post 473, Dwlee99 wrote:t3 I will policy you wtf

This reads as kinda partnery. dwlee is shading T3, but simultaneously discrediting the shade by calling it policy.

If one flips red, I'm going to want the other one dead.

This is shallow as fuck

T3 is in like 80% of my games, of course I'm going to be friendly with him

This seems slightly town

In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee

dwlee has decent tone, and 485 is slightly town.

I'd think scum would be more aware of wagon makeup for self-preservation.

In post 526, House wrote:

In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee

dwlee has decent tone, and 485 is slightly town.

I'd think scum would be more aware of VC makeup and current suspicions for self-preservation.

Ehh, reworded

Vote Count 1.04

TheZenMan (0):

Wake88 (0):

House (1):

HawaiianPizza

Save The Dragons (0):

Three (4):

GeorgeBailey, Dwlee99, fua, House

T3 (0):

GeorgeBailey (0):

fua (3):

Jacket, Three, T3

Jacket (0):

Dwlee99 (1):

redtea

cool cookie (0):

redtea (1):

cool cookie

HawaiianPizza (0):

Not Voting (3):

TheZenMan, Wake88, Save The Dragons

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate. Day 1 ends when an elimination is decided or in (expired on 2021-10-08 09:00:00).

Announcements

Wake88 has not picked up his role PM and has (expired on 2021-10-03 09:00:00) to post before I will replace him. I believe I have a potential replacement on standby.

Possums

jesus christ why is that bolded

what is your meta read on me anyway

In post 395, House wrote:

In post 393, redtea wrote:true. Does that point two 2 mafia prs then not counting the traitor, assuming the mod didn't have some odd idea then? And assuming I'm town ofc.

The fact you're gated and the traitor is immune is what makes me think the scum team has one PR & one goon, if your claim is real.

Quasi-investigatives typically have false positives/negatives.

ah yeah, that reminds me, the traitor is NK immune + gated (no specifics given beyond that). forgot to say that as i didn't really think it mattered, but perhaps it would be helpful when the traitor was trying to fashion a fakeclaim to also gate themselves. [/quote]
Gated as in... the bulletproof is complex or..?

In post 404, T3 wrote:

In post 348, redtea wrote:Okay caught up didn't realize people did say I should claim
I'm a town complex vigilante. Explains the bulletproof mafia, but that's also why my claim might not be that helpful as the counterpart has already been revealed.

This claim seems too complicated to come from scum?

see above. also, is redtea the kind of player who just rolls over and dies as scum? i suppose my starting point would be, it's exactly the sort of claim which might get them out of trouble, which makes me instinctively struggle to believe it.

I'm not, but I also don't think I'm seasoned enough to think of a fakeclaim like that without help from a partner.

dammit i forgot to preview
aaand half my post got eated

I remember part of it was me saying to cookie "wtf, 'i should be limmed if im basically vanilla', i said it before i still have value as town", and that if not for cookie's claim + info I wouldve voted fae for faes post about me

wait t3 so in #468 did you meant to quote #428 or no
and if not then what does #470 mean

In post 503, Jacket wrote:

In post 384, redtea wrote:actually I think you both are saying the same thing
I'm not actually back but I'm checking in, which has apparently been a mistake because I'm all over the place

In post 362, Jacket wrote:I think redtea's reaction to being wagoned is bad.

well thats just cause you're scummy
is that a take ive posted yet?

Am I scummy because I think your reaction is bad?

yes
Change my mind

In post 511, House wrote:

In post 490, cool cookie wrote:it's exactly the sort of claim which might get them out of trouble

That's a really short-term strategy. If redtea is fakeclaiming, no 2nd kill on a scum lim outs them, and vig is explicitly a town only role.

Not what I'd associate with a scum agenda.

Wait, how would I know who to go for in that situation?

In post 526, House wrote:

In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee

dwlee has decent tone, and 485 is slightly town.

I'd think scum would be more aware of wagon makeup for self-preservation.

So am I town or scum?

In post 536, redtea wrote:Wait, how would I know who to go for in that situation?

Personally, I'd say use your best judgement and pray you hit red, because a green flip will require a solid explanation.

I'm sure others will likely disagree with me and want you leashed, but I don't because:

1) I hate being told what to do with my role, so I geddit
2) Probably not the best idea to let unsuspected scum influence your shot, or let them know who to avoid targeting if the target is town

In post 537, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 526, House wrote:

In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee

dwlee has decent tone, and 485 is slightly town.

I'd think scum would be more aware of wagon makeup for self-preservation.

So am I town or scum?

Look at your role pm.

I can't answer that. I can just give you my opinion.

Well what's your opinion, because you said I was scummy for x and then said I was townie for y

STD why did you get off Three?

because it was a random vote

In post 540, Dwlee99 wrote:Well what's your opinion, because you said I was scummy for x and then said I was townie for y

I said partnery, but fair.

I didn't know that was an exchange between outside of the game friends.

I have a townlean on you.

In post 543, House wrote:

In post 540, Dwlee99 wrote:Well what's your opinion, because you said I was scummy for x and then said I was townie for y

I said partnery, but fair.

I didn't know that was an exchange between outside of the game friends.

I have a townlean on you.

nice

In post 542, Save The Dragons wrote:because it was a random vote

Oh, I thought it was serious. I think three has been scummy

In post 538, House wrote:

In post 536, redtea wrote:Wait, how would I know who to go for in that situation?

Personally, I'd say use your best judgement and pray you hit red, because a green flip will require a solid explanation.

I'm sure others will likely disagree with me and want you leashed, but I don't because:

1) I hate being told what to do with my role, so I geddit
2) Probably not the best idea to let unsuspected scum influence your shot, or let them know who to avoid targeting if the target is town

then whats the part about how if there arent 2 kills after a scum lim, that will out me as fakeclaiming?

In post 532, redtea wrote:I'm not, but I also don't think I'm seasoned enough to think of a fakeclaim like that without help from a partner.

Okay. I buy it.

In post 546, redtea wrote:

In post 538, House wrote:

In post 536, redtea wrote:Wait, how would I know who to go for in that situation?

Personally, I'd say use your best judgement and pray you hit red, because a green flip will require a solid explanation.

I'm sure others will likely disagree with me and want you leashed, but I don't because:

1) I hate being told what to do with my role, so I geddit
2) Probably not the best idea to let unsuspected scum influence your shot, or let them know who to avoid targeting if the target is town

then whats the part about how if there arent 2 kills after a scum lim, that will out me as fakeclaiming?

The following Day, there should be 2 flips. One from scum and one from you.

If you're targeting the same player as scum, your reads are shite at best and you need to die.

If scum doesn't know who YOU are targeting, odds are low that they'll hit the same player.

Like, technically they can no-kill, but it's suboptimal play to leave threats against them alive.

In post 531, Save The Dragons wrote:what is your meta read on me anyway

I'll never tell