There is a fair bit to unpack from today's discussion, but to start with, if it wasn't obvious, the read I had made on catboi at the time I hammered yesterday was a strong scumread, and I think a good case for scum!catboi can be made on the basis of page 15 alone, never mind all the stuff that happened today.
That page starts with him expressing a sentiment that Greeting had also expressed earlier in the day - that we would like to get rid of me, but didn't think a wagon on me was 'viable', which as I pointed out, I think vastly overstated the degree to which I was being townread (which wasn't all that much - 2 slots, the rest either being silent or shading me), and frankly, why does town care at that point anyhow? The second, and more telling response, is how he explains why he is indulging in pre-flip associatives in this game when he usually discourages the practise - that he has more decent than usual townreads. On questioning, however, it's clear that doesn't hold up, and it's...quietly dropped? I know I ended the day with the hammer about 5 hours later, after it was obvious that's all we were getting from catboit, but we ended the day with the strongest townread from catboit being that implosion was "reasonably okish" (and given who he is pushing now, you have to shake you head a bit at that one, too!), while also sheeping implosions argument that Thyn had been trying to keep his options open with respect to scumreading half the game, and also him trying to tell us that he had better than normal townreads this game to the degree he was happier to speculate on pre-flips D1.
I think, even absent the stuff with igor, I would have been voting there today, but absolutely nothing I have seen today gives me pause. Igor told a lie, that much is evident, but there are two possible lies - the one he admits to, that he faked a guilty result on a slot he thought (and to my mind, with good reason to think) scummy, and the second, that he was faking his entire claim. I get the impression that catboi has been doing his best to conflate the two.
As an example, take the game he links at
529. He says, but only when asked to post the game, not when it's first brought up in
524 that the circumstances are
slightly
different, but there are not, they are
widely
different. Igor claimed tracker when there was zero good cause for him to do so on page 5, in his 11th post of the game at a time there was minimal pressure on his slot, and the last vote him had been specifically invited. If that is a fake claim coming from scum, not only did he get lucky, but he rolled the dice at a time there was simply no need to. Surely catboi is smart and experienced enough to know the difference, and I don't buy that town!catboi would bring that up, even if he DOES beleive igor is fakeclaiming as scum, and he did get lucky and take that risk when it wasn't needed, without explaining that. 'Oh, this has happened in a newbie game before' is a huge overreach and one I think has to be deliberate.
Then there is the shitpush on implosion. He wants us to buy that implosion is making a bad-faith, non-genueine push on
him
, while also making posts like this:
In post 510, catboi wrote:could make a snide comment about the proofreading fail on that post being scum-indicative, but that's over the top and i don't actually believe that
How else I am expected to take a post like that, other than "please give me towncred for not using something I don't actually think is NAI to push implosion, but I'm still going to point out the thing I think is NAI, and maybe someone else will think it's scum-indicative." That's one example.
484 is another. I think someone is making a bad-faith shitpush here, but it isn't implosion.
VOTE: Catboi