Page 22 of 44
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:57 pm
by shaft.ed
I'm thinking regardless of Pug's alignment it would be in the town's best interest to use his one shot investigation tonight.
Why give up a free confirmed innocent? If he doesn't go along with it he's surely scum and we lynch him tommorow.
Mayhem, my defense of him is that I feel other people have behaved similarly, and as I stated above, I think it's a waste to remove the 1-shot cop from the game. ANd I don't care if you're pushy, you just seem tunneled.
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:05 pm
by armlx
I'm thinking regardless of Pug's alignment it would be in the town's best interest to use his one shot investigation tonight.
True. I can understand that.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:24 am
by iamausername
Unvote, Vote: Alabaska
.
He's a better lynch than Pug, and deadline is on the way.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:22 pm
by Claus
unvote. Vote: Twomz
votehopper + 260
HOS: P(M4yhen|Twomz)
FOS: iamausername (megatron), P(iamausername|Twomz)
mfos: pug
unfos: Alabaska
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:38 pm
by armlx
I'm willing to vote Alabaska if it comes down to it.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:42 pm
by Claus
< any lynch
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:55 pm
by Cyberbob
At this point I'd be willing to switch to Alabaska if it means avoiding No Lynch, though I still hold that iamausername is far more worthy of our votes.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:33 pm
by Claus
^^^^^^^^^^
iamausername <-> Twomz
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:10 pm
by M4yhem
I don't see anything to make me think unvoting Pug is a good idea.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:26 pm
by Cyberbob
Not even this?
shaft.ed wrote:I'm thinking regardless of Pug's alignment it would be in the town's best interest to use his one shot investigation tonight.
FOS: M4yhem
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:49 pm
by M4yhem
No. I think deciding our lynchs based on people's powers is a bad idea.
Fos yourself.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:05 am
by Claus
Will hammer.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:20 am
by Cyberbob
M4yhem wrote:Fos yourself.
no u
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:21 am
by Claus
Before Deadline
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:02 am
by curiouskarmadog
(Page 22, Day 1)
Pug89
- 6 (M4yhem, Rishi, armlx, Alabaska J, Twomz)
Alabaska J
- 3 (NabakovNabakovob, shafted, iamausername )
iamausername
- 1 (Cyberbob)
TheHermit
- 1 (Pug89)
NabakovNabakovob
- 1 (TheHermit)
Twomz
- 1 (Claus)
Not Voting:
Note: Deadline August 6th, 8:00 PM EST. With 12 alive it takes 7 votes to lynch, 6 is a no lynch.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:27 am
by Rishi
M4yhem wrote:No. I think deciding our lynchs based on people's powers is a bad idea.
Yes. Though the main reason the Alabaska wagon was derailed was due to his role. That seems like an exception, I think. It's not that we didn't lynch him because we thought he was useful, but it's the lack of information that his lynch provides to the town.
Pug could be useful. But if he's scum, he might investigate the person that we ask him to, but how can we believe the result?
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:45 am
by Claus
Not exception
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:47 am
by armlx
Rishi, Pug has to give someone else the cop investigation. If he does not target someone who we consider pro-town, its likely more investigation will go into the matter.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:49 am
by Claus
Give scum?
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:58 am
by armlx
Claus wrote:Give scum?
He could do that, but then the scum have to claim a fake investigation result which could turn up bad later.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:00 am
by Claus
Maybe.
Twomz?
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:01 am
by armlx
Twomz?
Not convinced either way on him.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:16 am
by Claus
260 <--> vote hopping?
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:21 am
by M4yhem
Which page is 260 on? I'm lazy and reading all posts by Twomz doesn't help- the numbers are different.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:40 am
by Claus
Page 11