Mafiascum.net

In post 508, That Idiot Ivan wrote:I think assuming Pooky will or won't do pretty much anything as any alignment is a fool's take. I also don't see a world where either mod gives them a posting restriction like that. Scum or town, doesn't matter; see set-up design info in the opening posts.

3am me wonders why you are saying this for Pooky slot and not Bombay, y'know the people who actually claimed a restriction

I've been thinking about whether that reaction from t3 to the chess thing should lock t3 town and have decided no especially while they ignore an elephant in the room on their push

I will not let t3 ignore me and then circle around to push some other bs

In post 197, Dwlee99 wrote:Also if anyone got a jailkeeping role, ik it is hard to pick a target so that you don't fuck over town - feel free to target me

Okay y'know what

Anyone who scumreads me

Why do I make this post as scum?

In post 528, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 197, Dwlee99 wrote:Also if anyone got a jailkeeping role, ik it is hard to pick a target so that you don't fuck over town - feel free to target me

Okay y'know what

Anyone who scumreads me

Why do I make this post as scum?

This is role madness with who knows what roles based on subreddits.

The answer to that is, who knows? Could litteraly be anything for any reason.

Wait that was accidentally good in a different way

I was expecting more from you after 524 cause underwhelming w/ amount of stuff that has happened but you're still around

why wouldnt I be around, I don't full time rp my flavour

I just mean like you weren't making other posts about what happened that I thought would be coming

In post 522, mastina wrote:I'm saying that Bombay's justification of it still doesn't make it fit even in context. The vote makes sense in context. That doesn't make it fit in context. I'm not sure how to word that but I've made it fairly clear. My point isn't that "the vote shouldn't have been made at all"; my point is that "the vote doesn't look like it came from town". It wasn't the presence of the vote (a vote in that way makes sense in the context); it was the way it was handled (it didn't fit in the context).

Ok but this is a lot of words that dont really explain anything ... *why* is it not a vote that doesnt come from town? Like what does it mean that 'it didnt fit the context and therefore was scummy'?
Similar with the monkery thing ... *why* is that a scumclaim from luke? Why is this not something town-luke would think?

In post 523, mastina wrote:That implies a scum perspective.

To give a viewpoint not biased towards scum, I had a genuine scumread on Bombay that happened to, by pleasant coincidence, overlap with my promise to LLD.

While I moved my vote as part of my promise to LLD, without the promise, I'd have remained on Bombay, because they are my strongest scumread.

Sure, and i acknowledge that its possible you're town and rhis is the explanation. But it has a scum perspective cuz i'm scumreading you and the reads dont make sense to me

In post 523, mastina wrote:It's hard to get more town than Suripoko has from 7 posts at the time. From Suripoko's first post I already had a townread. The Tiger-bad, the decision to post in images (which is obviously not a real post restriction), the view that skitter is scum (while I disagree, I don't see that perspective ever coming from the hydra if they were scum),

Fwiw i'm like 95% sure the tiger bad was a meme and not indicative of what they actually thoght abt my alignment at the time, but i could be wrong

In post 528, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 197, Dwlee99 wrote:Also if anyone got a jailkeeping role, ik it is hard to pick a target so that you don't fuck over town - feel free to target me

Okay y'know what

Anyone who scumreads me

Why do I make this post as scum?

Probably so you can point to this post and ask why you would make this as scum ...

In post 536, skitter30 wrote:

In post 528, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 197, Dwlee99 wrote:Also if anyone got a jailkeeping role, ik it is hard to pick a target so that you don't fuck over town - feel free to target me

Okay y'know what

Anyone who scumreads me

Why do I make this post as scum?

Probably so you can point to this post and ask why you would make this as scum ...

There is a simpler explanation I like better though ^-^

i thought i had a mechanics revelation moment, then i stepped back and realized that i jumped the gun.

Hi t3. I want to ask you a question

Posts 522 and 523 are shifting me towards Mastina being wrong town over being scum.

In post 522, mastina wrote: I'm saying that Bombay's justification of it still doesn't make it fit even in context. The vote makes

sense

in context. That doesn't make it

fit

in context. I'm not sure how to word that but I've made it fairly clear. My point isn't that "the vote shouldn't have been made at all"; my point is that "the vote doesn't look like it came from town". It wasn't the presence of the vote (a vote in that way makes sense in the context); it was the

way it was handled

(it didn't fit in the context).

Mastina, I am not sure what makes you think I would not joke around with a player that I am familiar with. Maybe you are missing the context that I am friends with Notty? Like, we have played several games together, we added each other on discord, and we are even in a Dungeons and Dragons group together now.

I might not have joke voted someone that way if I did not know them, but I am more comfortable with Notty then you then your average player.

In post 499, The Bombay wrote:I was in a "monkery" with Mastina, and she did not claim to be a mason (or a monk for that matter). To be fair, it makes more sense to not claim it when you are actually in one.
This is a pointless observation. If she fake claims it enough for you to say this, it is moot. I just found it interesting in an NAI kind of way.
~Luke

HURT: The Bombay

To be clear, this is a scumclaim in of itself from Luke. Both in portrayal of that game and in content from Luke. I don't believe this is a town-Lukewarm.

Not sure what you mean by this one.

I saw jjh's post that you claim mason frequently, especially if you are actually a mason or in a neighborhood -> remembered that I was in a monkery with you, and don't remember you claiming mason or monk day 1 -> thought it was interesting, but also that in context it made sense that you did not claim in that game -> realized that it meant nothing about your alignment this game -> commented anyways, because I have little self-control on spewing my thoughts to the thread.

---

I get the feeling that me engaging with you is going to locking you into a tunnel on us.

~Luke

In post 526, Dwlee99 wrote:I've been thinking about whether that reaction from t3 to the chess thing should lock t3 town and have decided no especially while they ignore an elephant in the room on their push

What elephant in the room are you saying is being ignored?

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=88352

Okay you asked and also game just ended. I got into like the same dumb pickle idk two weeks ago (can't be bothered to check dates) where Pooky hard tunneled me for three day phases until I became confirmed town. And t3 sees this and is like "okay yes Dwlee needs to die now" does not compute with me

I am giving thread breathing room now goodbye

In post 528, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 197, Dwlee99 wrote:Also if anyone got a jailkeeping role, ik it is hard to pick a target so that you don't fuck over town - feel free to target me

Okay y'know what

Anyone who scumreads me

Why do I make this post as scum?

There are plenty of reasons why scum might do this in a uPick.

If anything, my thought when I first saw this post was "why would town make this post." Would it not be better for a jailkeeper to either target the person they think might perform the night kill, or to use their ability as if it were a doctor?

Okay pause on the letting thread breathe cause yea

You can check my history on this or just believe me: When jailkeeper in role madness I've historically no actioned, especially early, because I think that the roleblock is more likely to prevent town from getting results than actually block a kill / block the target of the kill. I'm saying I should be jailkept because it won't prevent an investigative from acting

Okay so that is a response to dwlee's 528 which brought up the question of why scum would want to be jailkept

You have highlighted that the jailkeep has two components in the form of a roleblock and a heal

I don't really get where you're going with that though

T3's chess related push on dwlee is just bad and involves no critical thinking

If you know that the game was won/lost on time then;
Could Dwlee be a player?

There doesn't seem to be any evidence of premoves
If Dwlee was playing black, then black move 5 would have come much sooner assuming players knew that the game was on a timer
If Dwlee was playing white, then white move 4 would have come much sooner assuming players knew that the game was on a timer

In post 546, jjh927 wrote:Okay so that is a response to dwlee's 528 which brought up the question of why scum would want to be jailkept

You have highlighted that the jailkeep has two components in the form of a roleblock and a heal

I don't really get where you're going with that though

I guess I have neglected that T3 has backed it off, so at least he has realised it was bad