Mafiascum.net

In post 421, Frozen Angel wrote:Do you have actual reasoning for your suspicion or was it just that?

You're really killing me with this line of questioning. I mentioned it as a general concept and even referenced DGB as a source but since you're being adamant to pursue the subject then yes I happen to know some of those who did replace out before making a single post hate to play scum and are likely to rep out if the team didn't appeal to them.

In post 424, Nero Cain wrote:In fairness, there actually is a theory that most replace outs are done by scum but bringing it up is dumb

At least you're being honest and impartial about it. I like that. [side eyes Dwlee]

In post 425, Nero Cain wrote:like it adds 0 to the game and does nothing but light shade the replace ins

Hey. voting someone in rvs adds nothing to the game so let's skip it altogether. It's called indirect pressure my friend not adding shade. Just compare yours and frozen's reactiona to that of Dwlee and maybe you will spot a difference.

In post 433, Nero Cain wrote:It's been talked about multiple times in MD. Why is he talking about it in this game? IDK he's just scum that's hiding behind theory talk? maybe but whether or not said theory exists is irrelevant here, it's his motive that matters.

I brought it up because that was what I thought. You know what else I thought? I thought we were supposed to be open about how we are thinking about the game and how we are trying to develop our reads. Apparently that thought isn't true anymore.

Ok let me try it another way. If I was an investigative or informative direct or indirect I am hypothetically going to focus on the replacements as a priority. Ho's that?

In post 503, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 217, Eyes without a face wrote:Early townreads on both Andante and Dwlee for seemingly being the driving forces of the game getting out of RVS so quickly.

In post 408, Eyes without a face wrote:Well I know this is going to bring a lot of heat my way but I should let you all know I tend to suspect replacements more. I guess it was DGB (if memory serves me right) that once said if we eliminate all replacements town always wins (or something to that effect).

Anyway welcome FA.

Also @Andante I do appreciate the townread but something tells me I have yet to earn it. Do you tend to townread people who townread you?

In post 3, Datisi wrote:

Dwlee99 replaces LicketyQuickety.

Nobody said every single replace out is scum driven. After all we've had like 5 already and we can't possibly have 5 scums in this game. Do you understand what the term higher probability means?

ok ill read more closely when i have more time, but thanks for playing along everyone with the whole counter wagon on eyes thing, that was fun, but now that we've seen who was willing to jump on that massively low hanging fruit we can return to our regularly scheduled programming of a hockey lim, and if (when, imhotbqh) he flips scum then we know where to look next

VOTE: HockeyFan

In post 446, Greeting wrote:I like this post very much. Maybe I should look into Nero Cain after all?

it was dumb when she said it and it's still dumb when you agreed with it.

In post 450, HockeyFan wrote:VOTE: Andante

Dante is scummy for scum reading Scorp?

It's also an interesting coincidence that I blasted you for not voting and then you vote...

In post 440, Datisi wrote:Frozen Angel [1]: HockeyFan
Greeting [1]: Eyes without a face
Stephen A Smith [1]: Greeting
Andante [1]: Scorpious

not voting [3]: 0verki11, Frozen Angel, Andante

In post 475, Datisi wrote:Andante [2]: Scorpious, HockeyFan
Greeting [1]: Eyes without a face
wavemode [1]: Greeting

not voting [3]: 0verki11, Frozen Angel, Andante

like all these players being useless with thier vote. With the exception of Andante, I expect there to be multiple scum in this group.

In post 474, HockeyFan wrote:and I do not think clinging onto LHF is a scum trait

I'm Nero Cain and I'll be the IC for newbie 343.

It is a viable scum strategy to go after low and ground fruit and follow the path of least resistance.

it might be b/c I've already seen Eyes response to the pressure on him but I feel like FA's claim that Eye's reads are fabricated is pure nonsense. He's either scum that's doublind down or that that actually believes in that theory.

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

oof

In post 523, Andante wrote:who are we limming? or like top 2-3 names?

hockey? greeting? frozen angel? eyes?

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

FA defense + Eyes treating me and FA different for same thing could indicate FA and I are different alignments if eyes is scum which would make me think she is scum

In post 534, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

FA defense + Eyes treating me and FA different for same thing could indicate FA and I are different alignments if eyes is scum which would make me think she is scum

Pray tell how I treated you differently. Citation needed of you please

In post 531, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 446, Greeting wrote:I like this post very much. Maybe I should look into Nero Cain after all?

it was dumb when she said it and it's still dumb when you agreed with it.

In post 450, HockeyFan wrote:VOTE: Andante

Dante is scummy for scum reading Scorp?

It's also an interesting coincidence that I blasted you for not voting and then you vote...

In post 440, Datisi wrote:Frozen Angel [1]: HockeyFan
Greeting [1]: Eyes without a face
Stephen A Smith [1]: Greeting
Andante [1]: Scorpious

not voting [3]: 0verki11, Frozen Angel, Andante

In post 475, Datisi wrote:Andante [2]: Scorpious, HockeyFan
Greeting [1]: Eyes without a face
wavemode [1]: Greeting

not voting [3]: 0verki11, Frozen Angel, Andante

like all these players being useless with thier vote. With the exception of Andante, I expect there to be multiple scum in this group.

??? When did I say Dante was scum for scumreading Scorp, my reasons are in 370 and 450.

fireisredsir wrote:ok ill read more closely when i have more time, but thanks for playing along everyone with the whole counter wagon on eyes thing, that was fun, but now that we've seen who was willing to jump on that massively low hanging fruit we can return to our regularly scheduled programming of a hockey lim, and if (when, imhotbqh) he flips scum then we know where to look next

VOTE: HockeyFan

So you claim it was a "reaction" test, but the only conclusion u got from it was to ignore it and vote me? K

i have many conclusions but they are not worth delving into yet cause preflip discussions are kinda dumb. it did make for a lot of content that should end up being very useful later though. and it wasn't purely a reaction test, i wanted to push eyes for more content, but it's a nice added bonus

ok read a bit closer and man greeting looks kinda bad to me regardless of hockey's alignment. but apparently he gets elimmed as town like every game so idk, not really feeling like pressuring there yet

wave looks a lil better than he did previously I think

andante looks mostly null to me but i should go read one of her scumgames

i think the "inconsistency" between the way eyes has treated the different replacement slots is dumb and am side eyeing anyone taking that seriously. i mean, what, he said "welcome FA"? y'all mad he didn't welcome you? i don't get it

In post 535, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 534, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

FA defense + Eyes treating me and FA different for same thing could indicate FA and I are different alignments if eyes is scum which would make me think she is scum

Pray tell how I treated you differently. Citation needed of you please

It's pretty obvious

In post 525, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 421, Frozen Angel wrote:Do you have actual reasoning for your suspicion or was it just that?

You're really killing me with this line of questioning. I mentioned it as a general concept and even referenced DGB as a source but since you're being adamant to pursue the subject then yes I happen to know some of those who did replace out before making a single post hate to play scum and are likely to rep out if the team didn't appeal to them.

why did you suspect T3 replacing out and not any other slots? or why did you suspect me replacing in and not any other replaced in slots?

In post 531, Nero Cain wrote:it was dumb when she said it and it's still dumb when you agreed with it.

calling it dumb won't make it dumb really. But yeah I actually didn't like greeting calling it a great post either

In post 539, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 535, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 534, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

FA defense + Eyes treating me and FA different for same thing could indicate FA and I are different alignments if eyes is scum which would make me think she is scum

Pray tell how I treated you differently. Citation needed of you please

It's pretty obvious

I kind if agree. I sta4ted an early town read on you bu didn't do the same to her. My bad. You're no longer a town rad of mine? Happy? égalité fraternité liberté à tout le monde

In post 540, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 525, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 421, Frozen Angel wrote:Do you have actual reasoning for your suspicion or was it just that?

You're really killing me with this line of questioning. I mentioned it as a general concept and even referenced DGB as a source but since you're being adamant to pursue the subject then yes I happen to know some of those who did replace out before making a single post hate to play scum and are likely to rep out if the team didn't appeal to them.

why did you suspect T3 replacing out and not any other slots? or why did you suspect me replacing in and not any other replaced in slots?

Where did I say I suspected you or t3 and no one else? citation needed if you please

In post 408, Eyes without a face wrote:Well I know this is going to bring a lot of heat my way but I should let you all know I tend to suspect replacements more. I guess it was DGB (if memory serves me right) that once said if we eliminate all replacements town always wins (or something to that effect).

Anyway welcome FA.

Also @Andante I do appreciate the townread but something tells me I have yet to earn it. Do you tend to townread people who townread you?

In post 413, Eyes without a face wrote:Maybe not but statistically scum replace out more than town do and especially so at the start of the game. Someone who doesn't like to play scum or someone who didn't like their teammates or someone who thought one of their own are going down too early. I do not promote it to be a 100% plan but early replacement have a higher %age of being scum than you would expect.

these were my two posts in concern and I don't see anyone's particular name except if you count my saying hello to you which still doesn't say I suspected you and nobody else

In post 534, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 520, HockeyFan wrote:@Dwlee, in 505, u said eyes+FA could be partnered(presumably cuz of 503?), but why are u big on that being a partnery psot, when the same logic can be applied to u. Eyes TR'D you even after u being a replacement

FA defense + Eyes treating me and FA different for same thing could indicate FA and I are different alignments if eyes is scum which would make me think she is scum

first - what defense?

You're going in a tunnel vision on them for their replace theory thing. we both see their reads are fake but you outright go from that to them being mafia and I don't because I'm just not gonna agree with it that it can't be done by town. That doesn't mean I'm defending the slot. I was questioning it way earlier than you jumped on its wagon and did way more to sort the slot and the people jumping to vote him than you.

then you go with association hunting which is consistent with your previous line of thinking and behavior so I actually like your slot a bit more for saying it; even if it's the recipe for failure.

In post 544, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 408, Eyes without a face wrote:Well I know this is going to bring a lot of heat my way but I should let you all know I tend to suspect replacements more. I guess it was DGB (if memory serves me right) that once said if we eliminate all replacements town always wins (or something to that effect).

Anyway welcome FA.

Also @Andante I do appreciate the townread but something tells me I have yet to earn it. Do you tend to townread people who townread you?

In post 413, Eyes without a face wrote:Maybe not but statistically scum replace out more than town do and especially so at the start of the game. Someone who doesn't like to play scum or someone who didn't like their teammates or someone who thought one of their own are going down too early. I do not promote it to be a 100% plan but early replacement have a higher %age of being scum than you would expect.

these were my two posts in concern and I don't see anyone's particular name except if you count my saying hello to you which still doesn't say I suspected you and nobody else

so now you're saying that the replace post was not even directed at me?

In post 543, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 540, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 525, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 421, Frozen Angel wrote:Do you have actual reasoning for your suspicion or was it just that?

You're really killing me with this line of questioning. I mentioned it as a general concept and even referenced DGB as a source but since you're being adamant to pursue the subject then yes I happen to know some of those who did replace out before making a single post hate to play scum and are likely to rep out if the team didn't appeal to them.

why did you suspect T3 replacing out and not any other slots? or why did you suspect me replacing in and not any other replaced in slots?

Where did I say I suspected you or t3 and no one else? citation needed if you please

In post 408, Eyes without a face wrote:Anyway welcome FA.

In post 415, Eyes without a face wrote:I already did and fa didn't like it.

Why repeated mention of me when you openly hint after your theory then?

In post 544, Eyes without a face wrote:these were my two posts in concern and I don't see anyone's particular name except if you count my saying hello to you which still doesn't say I suspected you and nobody else

In post 538, fireisredsir wrote:i think the "inconsistency" between the way eyes has treated the different replacement slots is dumb and am side eyeing anyone taking that seriously. i mean, what, he said "welcome FA"? y'all mad he didn't welcome you? i don't get it

did you just use what fire said to backtrack on your expressed read

Like I wasn't even posting there why did you say fa didn't like it if it was not you pointing finger toward my slot?

Read it again and see for yourself.

or.. read the bolded bit of my response to you

In post 525, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 421, Frozen Angel wrote:Do you have actual reasoning for your suspicion or was it just that?

You're really killing me with this line of questioning.

I mentioned it as a general concept

and even referenced DGB as a source but since you're being adamant to pursue the subject then yes I happen to know some of those who did replace out before making a single post hate to play scum and are likely to rep out if the team didn't appeal to them.