Mafiascum.net

In post 522, Nero Cain wrote:although I feel like I wasn't being

THAT

trolly. Like my votes and fake daykill was how I felt and who I thought were scummy so was I really trolling that much? I get that my troll game needs works but I don't think I was being some unreadable void and I think that's kind of an ass stance.

Maybe I should have kept it going just to see who jumped on me or what happened.

If anyone had jumped on you for it I'd likely town read them for it. It was telegraphed enough that scum would consciously avoid mentioning it, imo.

In post 500, Uncrowned wrote:okay so Titus brought up that the slip could be a distraction for S_S, which would tie Furtive to S_S but as you're saying, wouldn't make sense since furtive SRs Ircher. makes sense.

This feels like you still don't understand me >.<

In post 502, petapan wrote:luke is lock town

[Peta Pictured Below]

he fits well

idk Roden, it's an ez thing to hang your hat on. Sure, there are going to call it out but I don't think scum would be immune from riding the Nero train if they felt like I was a viable wagon

In post 401, furtiveglance wrote:Nero any words for us?

like this is prob townie

and

In post 262, Klick wrote:Nero just to be very explicit

The way you're playing is making it very difficult to get a read on you

Not necessarily saying you need to stop! but understand that that's happening

this does not

12 is rvs and the others were you defending yourself which was also what I referenced in my original post about you

and 432 had nothing inherently wrong with it it's just you went back to referring to something about setup which I found funny

In post 526, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 500, Uncrowned wrote:okay so Titus brought up that the slip could be a distraction for S_S, which would tie Furtive to S_S but as you're saying, wouldn't make sense since furtive SRs Ircher. makes sense.

This feels like you still don't understand me >.<

Spoiler:

In post 221, Titus wrote:I think at least one of Ircher/SS if not both are scum. The timing of this slip argument right as SS gets pushed for reads is a bit sus when that argument was there all along.

Titus appears to be saying that scum presented the Ircher slip argument strategically after SS started getting pushed.

Lets say that that is a thought that you have. "The timing of the slip argument is sus." It feels like that makes:

1) The person who strategically brought it back up

scum

. [Furtive]
2) The person that the argument is distracting from

scum

. [Something Smart]
3) The person who the argument is pivoting towards

town

[Ircher] Unless she is saying it is a bus or distancing I guess

But then Titus's conclusion was that "one of Ircher/SS if not both are scum."

She shows little to no interest in Furtive, despite him being the one who did the thing that she is claiming to believe to be Sus.

And furthermore, out of the three of them, landed on Ircher locked scum, and the one that she has her vote on.

So the whole line of thinking does not make sense to me

ok, I'm getting you now. this makes a lot more sense.

do you think it's AI for Titus?

In post 529, Nero Cain wrote:idk Roden, it's an ez thing to hang your hat on. Sure, there are going to call it out but I don't think scum would be immune from riding the Nero train if they felt like I was a viable wagon

I think the chances of a successful wagon would be pretty slim exactly for the reason I gave.

In post 361, petapan wrote:bad vibes:

vivax
ausuka
titus

(latter two stronger than the former where i may not have a grasp of playstyle)

I am playing differently from my normal playstyle in this game and that is intentional

In post 374, furtiveglance wrote:221 doesn't make a lot of sense, but I don't think it's scummy. I like that Titus calls some posts town straight up, it's town indicative I think.

I disagree! I uncontroversially think furtive is town this game though

In post 531, Uncrowned wrote:12 is rvs and the others were you defending yourself which was also what I referenced in my original post about you

and 432 had nothing inherently wrong with it it's just you went back to referring to something about setup which I found funny

That's a simplified and not really accurate summary of those posts. You claimed all I talked about was mech, which is factually wrong. It's ok to say you just misremembered my posts.

You seemed to imply 432 had something wrong with it, you said I "proved you right" and you still seem to want to run me up. Talk to me about it.

In post 392, Vivax wrote:For weird flails and misjudging vibes and cause by now Ircher seems too obvious to be scum.

Why do you think titus/me/you isn't a real scumread list people can have

I believe it, honestly

Peta is maybe town but also slippery so going to stay paranoid there

tbh i think it would be funny to just finish off ircher right now but i don't want to end day 1 just yet - want to hear from a few of the people who only posted during rvs now that there's more content


but i think we can probably hit send by page 30 and make this a compact enjoyable game

brings a tear to my eye tbh

i thought 50 was optimistic but i was willing to dream big

and now we're talking 30?? we've come so far. im proud of u all

maybe a warm take but of the people who haven't posted since rvs group i think andres was the most scummy

im ok with flipping ircher.

In post 518, Nero Cain wrote:that's a lot of nulls is my first reaction

I'm surprised you think so? I suspected people might think I was making conclusions on too many slots too quickly

In post 534, Ausuka wrote:

In post 361, petapan wrote:bad vibes:

vivax
ausuka
titus

(latter two stronger than the former where i may not have a grasp of playstyle)

I am playing differently from my normal playstyle in this game and that is intentional

In post 537, Ausuka wrote:

In post 392, Vivax wrote:For weird flails and misjudging vibes and cause by now Ircher seems too obvious to be scum.

Why do you think titus/me/you isn't a real scumread list people can have

I believe it, honestly

Peta is maybe town but also slippery so going to stay paranoid there

hey it's a vibes list not a reads list

In post 540, fireisredsir wrote:maybe a warm take but of the people who haven't posted since rvs group i think andres was the most scummy

he should be fairly readable when he posts more don't feel the urgency to make a call there right away

isn't bad vibes just scumreads

I don't really know why Nero is so fixated on everyone scumreading him because I think exactly no one has expressed a scumread on him

given that that's not even close to what I said, I don't know why I'm fixated either.

In post 536, Roden wrote:

In post 531, Uncrowned wrote:12 is rvs and the others were you defending yourself which was also what I referenced in my original post about you

and 432 had nothing inherently wrong with it it's just you went back to referring to something about setup which I found funny

That's a simplified and not really accurate summary of those posts. You claimed all I talked about was mech, which is factually wrong. It's ok to say you just misremembered my posts.

You seemed to imply 432 had something wrong with it, you said I "proved you right" and you still seem to want to run me up. Talk to me about it.

in my original post I said mech or defending yourself. that qualifies under both. simplified, sure. but it's what you did.

and in the callout post I said what I just said above, and then 432 mentioned setup balance as your next post. there's not really much to "run up" it literally just looked like you were avoiding giving proper reads in favour of talking about setup shit which I think is +scum

if you were at work and just catching up then there's nor really much to discuss and I will have to judge you off of what you've done since then though I will maintain the first posting to me is still +scum

maybe it's because I'm not one to care for mech talk but if the majority of your posting is still on the topic of mech (even up to 432) I'll 9 times outta 10 be more inclined to think you're scummy. does that make sense?

In post 409, Uncrowned wrote:roden has gone missing ever since he stopped getting questioned for the mech mistake stuff

you got any actual input now or are you just here to defend yourself when you get sussed

for reference, this was my original post. so yeah, mech stuff + defending yourself which to me didn't really seem like any attempts at game progression

and I still have no idea what your reads are outside of a few comments here or there. maybe it's a playstyle thing but I'm not really getting it atm