In post 5261, Nachomamma8 wrote:because we're not clearing you for bussing?
because we're not attempting to lynch confirmed town?
because...?
which one of these two questions didn't cover your reasoning for being town.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:59 am
by BROseidon
There is 0 cost to lynching Andy.
There is a potential gain.
Not having one of us hammer Andy today is a strictly inferior decision.
pedit: You call it bussing because you make the fundamental assumption that I'm scum without looking at what actually happened.
I never tried to get Anti lynch. I proposed a crazy idea because not considering all possibilities is dumb.
You still haven't articulated why scum would bus Rach over me on day 1.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:59 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 5278, BROseidon wrote:Not having one of us hammer Andy today is a strictly inferior decision.
why?
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:00 am
by waynegg
For Nacho
10. ***Nachomamma8*** ~
Spoiler:
1485 reply to Nick's 873 of TD not voting
Venmar was in reference to FTL's 242 where they berate TD's
Venmar vote. Only problem? TD hadn't voted Venmar by that point.
In fact all the way up to his last post at this point (1385) TD has
yet to actually vote for Venmar, though he had talked about it.
Overall, I really liked Nacho's earlier posts better. This one seems to
come from an informed perspective. Especially the (WK?) defense
of Andy. That part reads like maybe he
did
draw scum and has
some dissonance with letting a buddy be mislynched due to relational
stuff with his slot. Back to null while I mull him over. 1926 on (all Tuesday the 20th posts) show both his commitment to
this game and all the townie goodness I would hope to see in town
Nacho 1986 wouldn't the best way to curb that be to lynch it? 3064 VERY IMPORTANT
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:00 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 5278, BROseidon wrote:You still haven't articulated why scum would bus Rach over me on day 1.
the game goes on another week or two while we wait to lynch you.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:01 am
by waynegg
Stupid spoiler tag...
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:02 am
by BROseidon
Bro hammers Andy:
If both town: Still get Bro lynch, get the Andy 1/2 lynch to save an NL later.
If Andy scum: Game's over.
If Bro scum: Lynch Bro next day, gg.
Just lynch Bro:
If both town: Only get bro lynch, have to NL later or execute same plan tomorrow.
If Andy scum: Andy gets to live untouched.
If Bro scum: Game ends 1 day sooner.
The first plan yields a better result in the first two scenarios, and an even result in the third.
Except you could renig for *reasons* or have been killed, etc. today we have bro who will be speed lynched if he doesn't follow through on hammer. Andy WIFOM is gone and we get to odd numbers.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:13 am
by Nachomamma8
no one will renig.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:20 am
by waynegg
Why not just do the same thing today with bro? I don't understand the resistance.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:22 am
by Nachomamma8
Andy is very likely town thanks to his claim and his play. BRO is not as likely town.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:25 am
by notscience
VOTE: Bro
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 10:34 am
by waynegg
In post 5294, Nachomamma8 wrote:Andy is very likely town thanks to his claim and his play. BRO is not as likely town.
And wouldn't that just seal his fate tomorrow without it hanging on a m/l to XYLO? I realize you and Andy decided early on to go out in a blaze of glory with each other and all, but the lynch Andy to get nacho just makes more sense. And notscience is voting BRO...
In post 5209, BROseidon wrote:pedit2: I have 0 mod experience and have no idea how setups work.
then why wouldn't you listen to other people when they say "this is how setups work"?
I'll listen to NS, Wayne, TD, and Mac about how setups work, because they are the only ones that I consider 100% clear. I'll like 95% listen to Anti.
hello. set-ups work in mysterious ways, bro. it shouldn't take a confirmed town to tell you this, but listen to what everyone else has said. i don't know why you are throwing your toys out of the pram like this. why not listen to anyone else?
godfather = likely cop claims are legit. whether two cop claims are legit is another thing, but we'll get to that.
ps: we should let varsoon claim his results before we hammer.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 1:23 pm
by BROseidon
In post 5298, Mac wrote:hello. set-ups work in mysterious ways, bro. it shouldn't take a confirmed town to tell you this, but listen to what everyone else has said. i don't know why you are throwing your toys out of the pram like this. why not listen to anyone else?
Because:
1) Possible scum-influence for most of the game.
2) I've been very out of lockstep with most of the players this game. Other than sort of Wayne, I haven't gotten into a groove with anyone, which has made it hard to work with people across the board.