Page 212 of 314

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:05 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 5274, Tchill13 wrote:Hopkirk went from saying we could switch the wheme wagon to TBG to not even pushing TBG at all.
Why does that matter?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:06 am
by Hopkirk
I kind of liked his interaction with FL/Wave on a reread earlier. Plus lots of other targets.
On a reread now, it looked bad rather than good.

TBG is one of the best lynches yeah.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:07 am
by Krazy
Dear god is that really yellow?

Mfw its the dress all over again.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:08 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 5277, Krazy wrote:Dear god is that really yellow?

Mfw its the dress all over again.
Hahahah this got a chuckle out of me irl

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:10 am
by Hopkirk
Maybe we use different background colours.
It's probably more white than yellow actually looking more carefully.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:11 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 5279, Hopkirk wrote:Maybe we use different background colours.
It's probably more white than yellow actually looking more carefully.
it was a very faint pink/red for me (mafblack)

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:11 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5183, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 3438, Kublai Khan wrote:Lol at Creature being a useless sack then showing up to bitch about poor town leadership. He hasn't even read the game. He's just throwing out random names.

"Omg scum-Pine will kill me" :roll: Pine is being replaced.

Creature needs rope tomorrow. Line that shit up.
In post 3439, Kublai Khan wrote:Especially if WhemeStar flips scum.
wtf is this?
In post 5241, wavemode wrote:
In post 4416, Kublai Khan wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

This calls to me.
In post 4557, Kublai Khan wrote:VOTE: Lalendra

Feeling better now.
why are there zero lalendra posts between these two decisions
@Myloninja13 - What's your read of wavemode? Why?

@wavemode - What's your read of Myloninja13? Why?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:12 am
by Kublai Khan
Aw, didn't mean to quote those. Meant to respond to them. hold on.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:12 am
by Scioness Sajj
In post 5268, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 5240, Scioness Sajj wrote:
In post 5238, Tchill13 wrote:Is it possible scum are scared to death of the protective and figured that hop would be protected instead of PP.
but why kill vt over a random town?
If I remember correctly PP was counterwagon to Wheme so that could be why
Meaning scum is afraid of port on hopkirk so they go after semi 'confirmed' town?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:13 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5183, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 3438, Kublai Khan wrote:Lol at Creature being a useless sack then showing up to bitch about poor town leadership. He hasn't even read the game. He's just throwing out random names.

"Omg scum-Pine will kill me" :roll: Pine is being replaced.

Creature needs rope tomorrow. Line that shit up.
In post 3439, Kublai Khan wrote:Especially if WhemeStar flips scum.
wtf is this?
I backed off of Creature for fairly public reasons. You can iso me to re-visit that.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:16 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5241, wavemode wrote:
In post 4416, Kublai Khan wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

This calls to me.
In post 4557, Kublai Khan wrote:VOTE: Lalendra

Feeling better now.
why are there zero lalendra posts between these two decisions
That's some real selective quoting to throw shade. Why are you just pulling out of context stuff and inventing a narrative?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:16 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 5283, Scioness Sajj wrote:
In post 5268, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 5240, Scioness Sajj wrote:
In post 5238, Tchill13 wrote:Is it possible scum are scared to death of the protective and figured that hop would be protected instead of PP.
but why kill vt over a random town?
If I remember correctly PP was counterwagon to Wheme so that could be why
Meaning scum is afraid of port on hopkirk so they go after semi 'confirmed' town?
I think so.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:17 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5236, wavemode wrote:can we actually talk about this PenguinPower kill

a CLAIMED VT ?

who has been wagoned on several different occasions this game?
Why is this an important discussion for you to have?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:20 am
by texcat
In post 5216, Myloninja13 wrote:
In post 5215, Krazy wrote:@Mylon Hopkirk basically accused you of being too lazy to do meta reads at the end of last game day, lol. Are you scum because you keep saying you've meta'd people but actually you haven't?
The former is fair lol, but if I were actually scum then that would be one of the least scummiest things about me lol.
Too scummy to be scum? Is that your defense? And did you actually answer the question?
In post 5237, wavemode wrote:is it possible that the only reason Hopkirk is alive is his end-of-day case on mylo?
I think Hopkirk is alive is because scum figured he would be protected. Why PP rather than someone else is a good question, but, of course, the wifom could go either way.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:21 am
by wavemode
In post 5285, Kublai Khan wrote:That's some real selective quoting to throw shade. Why are you just pulling out of context stuff and inventing a narrative?
er, why this reaction? what narrative? why can't it just be a question about what your reasoning was?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:22 am
by wavemode
In post 5287, Kublai Khan wrote:Why is this an important discussion for you to have?
?????

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:23 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5289, wavemode wrote:
In post 5285, Kublai Khan wrote:That's some real selective quoting to throw shade. Why are you just pulling out of context stuff and inventing a narrative?
er, why this reaction? what narrative? why can't it just be a question about what your reasoning was?
You quote 4416 and ignored 4418, which is the exact reasoning you're looking for. It's two posts away on the same page. So, you get the WTF? reaction.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:25 am
by wavemode
4418 doesn't contain your reasoning though...

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:26 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5290, wavemode wrote:
In post 5287, Kublai Khan wrote:Why is this an important discussion for you to have?
?????
That's not an answer. Why are you trying to push town into coming up with a conclusion when you could do it on your own? What's your goal?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:29 am
by Kublai Khan
is "I'm going to park my vote on Gamma Emerald for a bit while I read re-read.

It was about 24 hours to deadline and Lalendra was near lynch. Krazy had voted Gamma Emerald as a vanity wagon out of nowhere. So I parked my vote on Gamma Emerald to see if others would also jump on it. So if Lalendra flipped scum, I would see if anyone was aiming to counter-wagon.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:32 am
by wavemode
was that so hard

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:35 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 5293, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 5290, wavemode wrote:
In post 5287, Kublai Khan wrote:Why is this an important discussion for you to have?
?????
That's not an answer. Why are you trying to push town into coming up with a conclusion when you could do it on your own? What's your goal?
To explain: The best way to manipulate someone into doing something is to make it seem like they had the idea themselves.

"Let's discuss this" is basically prompting people to look into something and draw conclusions from it. The kind of conclusions you already want them to draw.

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:39 am
by wavemode
if that's what you think i was doing, you are free to have that opinion

i just saw it as generating discussion

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:52 am
by texcat
In post 543, Vaxkiller wrote:
In post 539, JarJarDrinks wrote:hey Vax, maybe it'd be easier to get people to vote for me if u point them to where you explain why u think I'm scum.

where is that again?
Its day 1. I have no reasons!

You are not on my town list nor are on anyone elses. I think it's a great place to start. You have done nothing since your wagon has started to dissuade me from lynching you.
There is also an added bonus that I will talk about tomorrow.


Lets get this party started so can do like Bob Seager says and work on my Night Moves.
@Vax, what was this about an added bonus?

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 9:06 am
by Tchill13
In post 5275, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 5274, Tchill13 wrote:Hopkirk went from saying we could switch the wheme wagon to TBG to not even pushing TBG at all.
Why does that matter?
It'd matter a lot more if we didn't know hops alignment. The fact that we know means Italian. Genuine change in perspective and I'd like to know why?

It matters because TBG is more than likely scum.