Mafiascum.net

33 – Transcend said he planned to RVS mirhawk the entire time, Implosion comments : I doubt he’d have claimed this if they were scum together

35 – Lapsa says it was null but likes the reasoning

67 – Titus claims Dunn is town based on unknowable/unsayable stuff

91- Varsoon

I HAVEN'T READ ANYTHING.
WHAT'S UP MY N-WORDS?
DON'T WORRY, I'M TOWN
I'VE GOT YOUR BACK.

161 – Zach says VLA is a perfect ‘not get lynched’ card for Airick

207 – Performer responding to A50 - I would think it'd be harder to win after you fake claim, then hard claim on day 1. I believe Aeronaut hosted a game this year where PRs outed themselves early on . Scum won that game.


216 – Performer wants to avoid unnecessary PR talk D1

240 – Performer

I just realized that there are literally only 4 people I played with , in here.
Nosferatu, do you recall the game where Firebringer was scum with Xtoxm Traitor, and what's his face as the 3rd scum? There's something strange going on here and I 'd like for you to try to look at that game. I'm going to dig into that game as well (moderated by chamber). I think that may help us in discerning alignment for Mr. X.

242 – Performer

@Nos I just found it! Man, I sound a little weird in that game LOL. Embarrassingly weird. Guess that's what happens when you're still only 3 months into FM. That game still brings tears to my ears when I read it . Such fantastic townplay. There was constant TvT too but we learned to look over it and focus on the right people. I wish I can say the person's name but I don't want to paint a target on the person.


323 – Zach, Performer, Implosion interesting stuff

347 – Lapsa claims Macho

349 – Titus calls it a gambit and says ‘me too’

367 – Boem says Transcend is going to look very silly after his flip

387 – Performer
Ok. This is going to sound crazy but I want to point out 2 people in here who I want to limit any serious interaction with on d1 at least, because I'm afraid for their safety. I don't want to paint targets on their backs , as I have a huge bias toward specific people and may accidentally draw too much attention to them.

Person X: I played with you when I was Town Mailman and you were in a hydra. We were both town.
We were also VTs in the 14-man large normal, which had 1-shot Bp Doc and Bp Bg.
Time and time again, you can read me well.

Person Y: We played in the Mini Normal where you survived as PR the entire game - impressive. You read me well and defended me throughout the game, which made a further impression on me. I was constantly in this back-and-forth with another Townie. We were both town. In this game , there was a 2-man scum team with 1 Mafia Traitor. I think this game was back in Nov 2015.

412 – Implosion doubts scum would randomly claim macho


499 – Dunn adamant Titus is town

542 – Zach I could vote myself and you'd still need an NK to touch me. Facts.


692 – Dunn specs 3 mafia 3 werewolf bunch of town PRs

793 – Titus claims masons with Dunn (Dunn’s comment on hearing the werewolves ‘howling’)

872 – Zach asks what’s stopping the Masons being NKed, Dunn (873) hopes for doc or (874) JK, bodyguard, mafia having pity

918 – Dunn ‘wouldn’t fake claim’

925 – Wake: Looks bad for Dunn if Titus flips non-mason

959 – Boem is not sure what to make of Masons, I've never played this setup before so I'm confused. All that metagame talk and reading other players based on their metagame doesn't help me either because I've never played with you people before (or this setup) so I feel this game is somewhat beyond my reach at the moment. But I'll keep trying.

925 – Wake

968 – Shannon says not to waste an investigative PR on her (977 Wake questions why) (987 – Boem It can be argued both both ways in my opinion. If you are town you don't want investigative PR to "waste" a check by investigating you. Scum can also ask investigative PR to check them to try to appear like they have nothing to hide. Conclusion: this discussion is pointless.

In my opinion, investigative PR should check people who tend to stay long in the game, that means not getting shot by mafia often.)
1328 – Performer It sounds like you're saying PRs aren't that important.?


1334 Varsoon - Think of it this way. We're playing poker. Dunnstral and Titus just went all in on the first hand. Are you going to fold, or will you meet their gambit and call?
I, for one, am a gambling man. I know what I've got up my sleeves, and I'm confident they're bluffing.

1337 – Varsoon and Zach fake claim masons

1344 – Varsoon
I've got your 'back' is the clue to look at things from back to front.
What's up my N-words is actually referencing Mason, because if read from back to front, it's Nosam.
Furthermore, in my last game as a Mason (Cohen Brothers Mafia), I was not town despite being in a Masonry.
That's why I said "Don't worry, I'm town" here.

Why would I make such a post without reading anything?
What point does it serve?
Purely role-crumbing.


1349 Implosion - This is such a misrepresentation of why we shouldn't vote the masons.

-The odds of it being a scum gambit are so horrifically low. The risk/reward of claiming masons on d1 as scum is absolutely terrible.
-They are outed as power roles; they are, therefore, likely to be killed at night, meaning we don't have to try to sort them at all.
-If by some miracle they are scum, they will keep surviving nights and they will become more and more likely scum candidates as the days go by, allowing us much more confidence in sorting them later
-If we lynch other scum in that time, then the more scum we lynch, the more unlikely the masons are to be lying, making it easier to sort them later
-At massclaim, if there is a huge abundance of power being claimed, they also become easier to sort then


1411 – (if there are masons, which was a gambit) - The other possibility is like, 4 mafia, 1 serial killer, 1 vigillante, and masons?

Zach doesn't know but having like three night kills in these here large setups is the NORM


1417 -
Ok. what's wrong with that? I'm outted mason so why can't I speculate on the setup? I'm not rolefishing and I can't let slip my role by speculating so ??


1474 - Titus knows it, assuming me and her don't both die, it will be revealed later. Or maybe you get shot by vig?

Lapsa is who I would shoot if I were a vig
1524 – Dunn says ‘vig shoot Zac’
1525 – Zach says Dunn: Vig waste your shot