Mafiascum.net

i think I'll have a verdict on saki when <i>I personally</i> review the vca.

otherwise I'd be delighted to crucify saki for daring to suggest we poe on such a bad list

In post 5324, Fish Monger wrote:also

1 i faked bg to try to draw some kind of nk. my roke says i may or may not have any hidden power.
2 panda, saki, and focus on the masons. its not too sketch that the largely lurkerish masons are not dead -yet, but lets not conf our eggs

Well you had me fooled a bunch. Jeez.

Why keep up that claim for so long? Such a long fake claim is detrimental to town.

In post 5317, Rautherdir wrote:Unless... Unless Aeon has a traitor. That would actually kind of make Primate's interaction with me day 1 make sense; they would have thought I was softing my role. The event last night may have been for all non-traitor members of Aeon being killed with the traitor still alive (Possibly representing the traitor getting Aeon's night kill)

didn't fish say RP claimed traitor in the PT or something.

well if nothing else I remember something about "RP fake claiming traitor to avoid being shot by Fish if he was Aeon". [Citation Needed]

Attrocious PoE huh

In post 4816, Sakura Hana wrote:Might as well make it look better.

Reads List v2.0

Strong Town

Dunnstral

Alisae

Almost50

KidAmn

Rautherdir

Towny

MariaR

Gamma Emerald

Oversoul

Cloudkicker

3P?

Bambi Jay

Leftovers

pisskop
RedPanda

Claude

Primate

If coming from here i got such a bad PoE list then show your work.

In post 5321, Bambi Jay wrote:

In post 5319, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5318, Bambi Jay wrote:

In post 5300, CloudKicker wrote:I want bambi to full claim, no more lies

When have I ever lied? I am the most honest person in this room, friend. I have not lied in Mafia a day in my life.

Why are you not coming forward with your full role, everyone else claimed

I've given quite a lot of hints though and already claimed my tracking ability? Isn't that enough?

No

In post 5323, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 5285, Sakura Hana wrote:The more you complain about being in a PoE the more i want to vote you.

VOTE: sakura

silly vote for a silly reason

What do you think of RP/Kidamn?

In post 5332, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5323, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 5285, Sakura Hana wrote:The more you complain about being in a PoE the more i want to vote you.

VOTE: sakura

silly vote for a silly reason

What do you think of RP/Kidamn?

This is p. nakedly obvious what you're trying to do and I'm 99% sure it won't pan out how you're hoping but feel free to keep openly scumtelling

In post 5333, KidAmn wrote:

In post 5332, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5323, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 5285, Sakura Hana wrote:The more you complain about being in a PoE the more i want to vote you.

VOTE: sakura

silly vote for a silly reason

What do you think of RP/Kidamn?

This is p. nakedly obvious what you're trying to do and I'm 99% sure it won't pan out how you're hoping but feel free to keep openly scumtelling

lold, openly scumtelling

In post 5333, KidAmn wrote:

In post 5332, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5323, Fish Monger wrote:

In post 5285, Sakura Hana wrote:The more you complain about being in a PoE the more i want to vote you.

VOTE: sakura

silly vote for a silly reason

What do you think of RP/Kidamn?

This is p. nakedly obvious what you're trying to do and I'm 99% sure it won't pan out how you're hoping but feel free to keep openly scumtelling

What do you think I am trying to do and why is it scumtelling

In post 5303, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5302, Sakura Hana wrote:There's literally no reason to fake scumhunting your partner in the hood instead of laying it out in the open if the hood's for 2 ppl and you cant predict that a 3rd would show up.
On top of the scumhunting feeling pretty genuine.
On top of the role.
On top of Kidamn or their supposed partners not making sure they get serum so they can vote.
There's several reasons to think kidamn is just town.

Thats much better than telling implying hes town for having no serum d1

Hey Mr. Occam's Razor, did you forget about this already.

In post 5336, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 5303, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5302, Sakura Hana wrote:There's literally no reason to fake scumhunting your partner in the hood instead of laying it out in the open if the hood's for 2 ppl and you cant predict that a 3rd would show up.
On top of the scumhunting feeling pretty genuine.
On top of the role.
On top of Kidamn or their supposed partners not making sure they get serum so they can vote.
There's several reasons to think kidamn is just town.

Thats much better than telling implying hes town for having no serum d1

Hey Mr. Occam's Razor, did you forget about this already.

Hm no, why are you implying that my recent post is being incoherent with the one you quoted?

... Just going to clear this up.
For at least one of me or Dunn to be scum, both of the following must be true:
. Either town is fake-claiming masons with scum, scum from separate teams decided to fake-claim masons together (and from one of the member's first post), or one of the scum teams still has two members that had decided to take the risk of claiming masons together.
. Either Simotech is in Iustitia, or Iustitia does not have any representation

I'll also go ahead and say that Dunnstral received a Green sealed business invitation last night. I'm not sure if we've actually mentioned we have a PT or not yet, but we do.

In post 5332, CloudKicker wrote:What do you think of RP/Kidamn?

This question actually.

In post 5339, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 5332, CloudKicker wrote:What do you think of RP/Kidamn?

This question actually.

Why is it incoherent? I am asking Fish, not you

Did i misinterpret your question then.

It feels like you're nudging fish to look at kidamn.

In post 5338, Rautherdir wrote:... Just going to clear this up.
For at least one of me or Dunn to be scum, both of the following must be true:
. Either town is fake-claiming masons with scum, scum from separate teams decided to fake-claim masons together (and from one of the member's first post), or one of the scum teams still has two members that had decided to take the risk of claiming masons together.
. Either Simotech is in Iustitia, or Iustitia does not have any representation

I'll also go ahead and say that Dunnstral received a Green sealed business invitation last night. I'm not sure if we've actually mentioned we have a PT or not yet, but we do.

FTR, i dont think mason fake claiming is something dunn would do. Also i dont think Dunn is scum, so i trust him that he and you are masons until he says otherwise, and until then ill trust that both of you are town.

In post 5338, Rautherdir wrote:... Just going to clear this up.
For at least one of me or Dunn to be scum, both of the following must be true:
. Either town is fake-claiming masons with scum, scum from separate teams decided to fake-claim masons together (and from one of the member's first post), or one of the scum teams still has two members that had decided to take the risk of claiming masons together.
. Either Simotech is in Iustitia, or Iustitia does not have any representation

I'll also go ahead and say that Dunnstral received a Green sealed business invitation last night. I'm not sure if we've actually mentioned we have a PT or not yet, but we do.

You guys are confirmed town considering it shouldn't be more than 3 slots per s factions and town would never maintain this claim the way you both did over 4 days

In post 5342, Sakura Hana wrote:It feels like you're nudging fish to look at kidamn.

I am asking him what he thinks about kidamn. Just because I got your read on the slot means that I am done trying to know what others thinks of it

Well just so u know, you're not lynching Kidamn over my dead body.
Just in case.

In post 5346, Sakura Hana wrote:Well just so u know, you're not lynching Kidamn over my dead body.
Just in case.

Why do you think that me asking Fish what he thinks of kidamns means that I want to vote kidamn or that I fos them? You are attributing me intentions & its a bad habit

In post 5347, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5346, Sakura Hana wrote:Well just so u know, you're not lynching Kidamn over my dead body.
Just in case.

Why do you think that me asking Fish what he thinks of kidamns means that I want to vote kidamn or that I fos them? You are attributing me intentions & its a bad habit

Because that's what it looked like which is why i asked you if i was misinterpreting your post.

In post 5348, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 5347, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 5346, Sakura Hana wrote:Well just so u know, you're not lynching Kidamn over my dead body.
Just in case.

Why do you think that me asking Fish what he thinks of kidamns means that I want to vote kidamn or that I fos them? You are attributing me intentions & its a bad habit

Because that's what it looked like which is why i asked you if i was misinterpreting your post.

My post is extremely clear and concise, I am asking fish what he thinks about two slots. There's nothing to misinterpret, all you did is giving me intentions