Mafiascum.net

Guess it is true then. jjh, Jingle and mastina are the scumteam, as I suspected.

Also, @Firebringer People are not sheeping you, you are sheeping me. I suspected mastina long before you even joined, so don't take the credit for it. >.>

In post 5340, Shoshin wrote:You're positive Mastina is town? Why?

Varsoon interactions, play, role. In that order.

I'm ignoring the guilty for the moment because there is a very specific set of actions to take in this particular circumstance, and discussing why it is/isn't believable is in the not yet pile.

Still though, likely she'll refuse gladiating the players scumreading her like Nico because she fears she'll be then lynched.

I want to see if mastina will change her flavorclaim before revealing what were exactly my results

In post 5351, Jingle wrote:

In post 5340, Shoshin wrote:You're positive Mastina is town? Why?

Varsoon interactions, play, role. In that order.

I'm ignoring the guilty for the moment because there is a very specific set of actions to take in this particular circumstance, and discussing why it is/isn't believable is in the not yet pile.

Then I ask the same question again: did the possibility he suicided to give her towncred cross your mind, or are you ignoring that possibility on purpose?

Same question @jjh

In post 5351, Jingle wrote:

In post 5340, Shoshin wrote:You're positive Mastina is town? Why?

Varsoon interactions, play, role. In that order.

I'm ignoring the guilty for the moment because there is a very specific set of actions to take in this particular circumstance, and discussing why it is/isn't believable is in the not yet pile.

VOTE: Jingle

You don't ignore the guilty.

In post 5347, Jingle wrote:I'm pretty sure he scumclaimed and cannot mechanically speak as to why.

In post 5348, Creature wrote:

In post 5345, Creature wrote:I'm guilting his beloved mastina who, if it wasn't her role, would've been lynched by now.

hence why I scumclaimed.

Nope.

In post 5355, NicoRobin wrote:

In post 5351, Jingle wrote:

In post 5340, Shoshin wrote:You're positive Mastina is town? Why?

Varsoon interactions, play, role. In that order.

I'm ignoring the guilty for the moment because there is a very specific set of actions to take in this particular circumstance, and discussing why it is/isn't believable is in the not yet pile.

VOTE: Jingle

You don't ignore the guilty.

I explicitly do at this point. It's just correct play.

You ignore the guilty until the guiltied party responds to it, regardless of whether you believe in the validity of the guilty, because anything I say can be used by mastina to make her response more believable.

Commenting on it prematurely is basically the most antitown reaction to a guilty, second only to sheeping the guilty blindly without considering it's validity.

Now, if you want I can teach Hidden Information Games: 101 in the thread, or we can instead pretend we collectively have two braincells to rub together.

Let's wait two days for mastina to comment on it anyway

In post 5332, Creature wrote:mastina's flavor isn't Ginngie

VOTE: mastina

oh yeah that’s bad

wanna unleash pressure on WhemeStar for now?

In post 5345, Creature wrote:I'm guilting his beloved mastina who, if it wasn't her role, wouldn't even be a talking point right now.

FTFY.

In post 5359, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5332, Creature wrote:mastina's flavor isn't Ginngie

VOTE: mastina

oh yeah that’s bad

I know

Losing two lynches for scum is bad

In post 5358, Creature wrote:Let's wait two days for mastina to comment on it anyway

Also this @Jingle, plus mastina reads in order anyways always so she’ll never get to the climax before the buildup

In post 5360, Creature wrote:wanna unleash pressure on WhemeStar for now?

The lack of commitment there is increasingly suspect.

In post 5364, Jingle wrote:

In post 5360, Creature wrote:wanna unleash pressure on WhemeStar for now?

The lack of commitment there is increasingly suspect.

Fine

Just hop in

Creature, as interesting as this is, if Mastina wants to claim something to do with redirection then the flavour would have to belong to another player in the game

In post 5367, jjh927 wrote:Creature, as interesting as this is, if Mastina wants to claim something to do with redirection then the flavour would have to belong to another player in the game

My result doesn't seem to indicate I was redirected, but let's see.

In post 5363, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5358, Creature wrote:Let's wait two days for mastina to comment on it anyway

Also this @Jingle, plus mastina reads in order anyways always so she’ll never get to the climax before the buildup

You'll forgive me for not discussing possible outs for the player being guiltied because she always reads chronologically. Or you won't, but that would be moronic.

Also, she promised content today, so hopefully it won't be another two days. :fingers crossed:

In other words, you may as well actually go all out with the guilty because I doubt Mastina is gonna go "I lied"

That said I don't think Mastina is the kind of player that would lie about flavour when it's one of those things in uPicks that can be very easily discovered as a lie and also RC's gladiate flavour has been "A guilty has been declared" so I would like you to do a common sense check before we even get off the ground here

In post 5368, Creature wrote:

In post 5367, jjh927 wrote:Creature, as interesting as this is, if Mastina wants to claim something to do with redirection then the flavour would have to belong to another player in the game

My result doesn't seem to indicate I was redirected, but let's see.

Do you mean to say that it is reasonable that her flavour would be a gladiate?

Hey jj.

Shuddapayouface.

In post 5370, jjh927 wrote:In other words, you may as well actually go all out with the guilty because I doubt Mastina is gonna go "I lied"

Still want to say what she has to say.

In post 5282, Jingle wrote:

In post 5043, Creature wrote:

In post 5037, Jingle wrote:Oh, btw. I totally didn't act last night because

nihilism

.

Hi

In post 5196, Creature wrote:I believe I got an incriminating result on mastina (barring redirection)

Scumclaim, I think.

I'd like to point out that it is the combination of these, not either individually that is the potential scumclaim. Of the two, the former is far more alignment indicative.

For the record.