In post 5311, Rad wrote:Yo nancy if you're town, we just don't pay nicely together. You don't understand me, I don't understand you, and we're both getting scummy reads from it. Let's just back off each other ok? I read your past town games and you focus so hard on anyone who thinks you're scum that I know I'm walking into a town death land mine discussing anything with you. How about I point out stuff I find strange about you, you point out stuff you find strange about me, and we let other people sort us out? Deal?
This feels like an odd post. It's as if Rad wants to back off from earlier Puppets reads/interactions a bit but wants to articulate a reason for doing so that seems overly townie on the off-chance anyone calls them out about it.
In post 5311, Rad wrote:Yo nancy if you're town, we just don't pay nicely together. You don't understand me, I don't understand you, and we're both getting scummy reads from it. Let's just back off each other ok? I read your past town games and you focus so hard on anyone who thinks you're scum that I know I'm walking into a town death land mine discussing anything with you. How about I point out stuff I find strange about you, you point out stuff you find strange about me, and we let other people sort us out? Deal?
This feels like an odd post. It's as if Rad wants to back off from earlier Puppets reads/interactions a bit but wants to articulate a reason for doing so that seems overly townie on the off-chance anyone calls them out about it.
I feel like town who thinks they might be TvT would want to back away for this as well
In post 5311, Rad wrote:Yo nancy if you're town, we just don't pay nicely together. You don't understand me, I don't understand you, and we're both getting scummy reads from it. Let's just back off each other ok? I read your past town games and you focus so hard on anyone who thinks you're scum that I know I'm walking into a town death land mine discussing anything with you. How about I point out stuff I find strange about you, you point out stuff you find strange about me, and we let other people sort us out? Deal?
This feels like an odd post. It's as if Rad wants to back off from earlier Puppets reads/interactions a bit but wants to articulate a reason for doing so that seems overly townie on the off-chance anyone calls them out about it.
Well I just don’t think there was anything remotely suspicious about my not responding to Bell’s question right away or responding like how I did. But it was the context of it that concerned me more. RAD wanted me to vote Mala. He agrees with my analysis of the games I linked, then immediately shades me because I didn’t respond to a question I didn’t even have an answer to right away and before that, he asked me the VC quote question, like he was reading something into betond the super obvious. And he made that post right after I dropped him down to a null. so idk?
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:56 am
by Dancing Puppets
In post 5353, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm completely null on Mala to be honest. But like Enchant, it's a wagon I'd potentially take and compromise on to end the day.
Would people still not consider Johnny at all?
I don’t understand why either is scum?
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:57 am
by Cat Scratch Fever
Last VC was in 5235 if you need to see for yourself. I'm at work and not going to do full VCs
In post 5339, Frogsterking wrote:I think you have the highest awareness of the gamestate right now because of your extremely high activity levels.
"ceph is pocketing math by saying we should read his posts"
>posts this
didn't frogster say something about gamestate awareness as reason to suspect us?
~GE
Yeah ~GE, over 5000 posts ago
still felt I should confirm whether I remembered correctly
why do you think gamestate awareness is scummy? (if that's the read you have on cephrir)
~GE
I read Ceph as null atm.
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:59 am
by Cephrir
In post 5353, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm completely null on Mala to be honest. But like Enchant, it's a wagon I'd potentially take and compromise on to end the day.
Would people still not consider Johnny at all?
i would but there's a bunch of resistance for mysterious reasons
In post 5353, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm completely null on Mala to be honest. But like Enchant, it's a wagon I'd potentially take and compromise on to end the day.
Would people still not consider Johnny at all?
i would but there's a bunch of resistance for mysterious reasons
i dont get it rly
Because a bunch of us thought she was seriously claiming to talk to dead players in her opening so we ruled her out early as a TPR and became biased.
In post 5353, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm completely null on Mala to be honest. But like Enchant, it's a wagon I'd potentially take and compromise on to end the day.
Would people still not consider Johnny at all?
i would but there's a bunch of resistance for mysterious reasons
i dont get it rly
Because a bunch of us thought she was seriously claiming to talk to dead players in her opening so we ruled her out early as a TPR and became biased.
Oh nevermind Johnny
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2022 8:01 am
by MathBlade
Those four are the top wagons.
Unless you have a goddamn miracle case someone is scum I don’t fucking care
Stop doing vanity wagons and listen to other people
In post 5353, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm completely null on Mala to be honest. But like Enchant, it's a wagon I'd potentially take and compromise on to end the day.
Would people still not consider Johnny at all?
I don’t understand why either is scum?
General lack of content from both. It's NAI but they're quite hard to sort in general, I'd have them both at null. But they've certainly not done anything when they have posted to convince me they are town. I'd rather eliminate Johnny personally but if that's not happening I'd take a compromise wagon if we had to given it's going to be incredibly difficult to get everyone agree on a contentious choice.