Mafiascum.net

also
my vote is on smith pie, if you didn't see

You're trying to tie me to smith. Don't act like you're not

im not tying you to smith

im telling people youre scum and that he is scum

I'm not one to be tied down to a man so I recommend suiciding now to solve this

requesting that a town-town pair should leave is a rather bold move, no?

I was talking to you

I'm not backing down until at least mhsmith dies. i voluntarily back down if both in that pair are town.

which they are not, so then it's your ass that should leave the dance

In post 5381, inspectorscout wrote:i voluntarily back down if both in that pair are town.

What does this mean?

In post 5382, inspectorscout wrote:which they are not, so then it's your ass that should leave the dance

Please explain how it's plausible for us to be both scum.

Don't just say "you're both scummy"

I don't see a relation to mhsmith apart from jester, who posted really awkwardly but didn't come off as scummy.

That makes me resort to my next scumread. You.
I already said this; it shouldn't be too hard to understand.

In post 5377, inspectorscout wrote:im not tying you to smith

im telling people youre scum and that he is scum

Uhm, what?

In post 5355, pieguyn wrote:if this happens, I 100% promise I won't hold it against you at all.

You know, sometimes I get this kind of thoughts, too, but then everybody starts yelling at me that I'm a town/town pair and would be gamethrowing if I quit no matter what.

I'm super nervous that I'm missing something and it's going to be LYLO eventually and Dunn + Jester have me pocketed so deep that I'm basically in Narnia and I've literally no idea who's scum if Smith is town.

Sorry pie.

I revoke any interest in world where jester-mds survives.

A world*

Who's the scum, Kagami?

In post 5386, MiniDeathStar wrote:

In post 5377, inspectorscout wrote:im not tying you to smith

im telling people youre scum and that he is scum

Uhm, what?

I actually liked that inspector post - it showed that he's not trying to just line up lynches through association (more scummy thinking), but rather has independent scumreads on both of them which would yield them being scum together (more townie thinking).

What precisely was your problem with it?

If I were going by independent scumreads, I'd have lynched your pair already?

In post 5392, MiniDeathStar wrote:If I were going by independent scumreads, I'd have lynched your pair already?

Wait you're gonna act like you haven't been pushing since like the start of second dance (and just failed to lynch me over Parama)? Has you read happened to change on me? If so you're gonna have to make that clear, you're not gonna stay in this limbo where you don't make your read on me clear - so then you can keep me and push me later if you're scum.

And your sarcastic comment didn't even answer my question: What exactly did you have a problem with in inspector's post?

Like wtf does "I'd have lynched your pair already" even mean or imply.

You're not a one man voting bloc that magically gets whatever lynch you desire. BUT you have tried to lynch me.

I meant to say you've been ridiculously scummy and I could have pushed your pair like Dunn and Jester did and like HS wanted to, but I'm not as sold on the double bussing theory as Dunn is.

In post 5393, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:And your sarcastic comment didn't even answer my question: What exactly did you have a problem with in inspector's post?

First of all it was self-contradictory. "I'm not saying you're both scum, I'm just saying you're scum and he's scum".

Second of all it was useless. "Smith and Dunn are not likely to be town or scum together" was already discussed to death by me and pie. What did inspector bring to the table? Nothing.

In post 5390, MiniDeathStar wrote:Who's the scum, Kagami?

Still Jester and Smith, in all likelihood.

VOTE: smith pie

I thought I was voting here.