Mafiascum.net

nah let's hammer scum
VOTE: mirhawk claim sounds like a fake claim.

I have attention issues and people are ignoring me

Sorry

Holy shit. Shotty.

Pip you're terrible. Keep in mind that I'm pretty much exclusively blaming you for bad play here.

Marquis pretty much doesn't get to claim whatever info they had because they're going to die overnight you idiots.

Actually yeah a good chunk of this is shottys fault too.

In post 5404, Mirhawk wrote:Actually yeah a good chunk of this is shottys fault too.

I straight sheeped itl here

Actually I guess I blame several people, pup just annoys me the most.

Anyways, good luck guys. Try not to lose.

This is a clown fiesta. God bless your soul, mirhawk.
Okay imitating norbert is fun BUT SERIOUSLY JDNDNJD

Sigh. Pip was probably the absolute worst person to sheep.

In post 5408, Mirhawk wrote:Sigh. Pip was probably the absolute worst person to sheep.

Well 210 pages is a lot to read.

That's why I'm not super Pissed at you. I still wish you had waited until marquis had time to say something, she's our cop.

You quickhammered with a sheep vote. That is literally exactly what I was told to.do in cyberpunk.mafia by.my scum team.

In post 5399, dramonic wrote:Can we stop putting people at L-1 so early, especially considering MARQUIS CLAIMED INFO.

Exactly.

...

also I'm pretty sure I didn't hammer

In post 5397, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: Mirhawk

Think that's L-1

This was L-3

In post 5413, drmyshottyizsik wrote:also I'm pretty sure I didn't hammer

I know. There's only 5 votes on him total. Shoulda kept up the act longer though shotty.

It was a good reaction test though, I feel you were genuine,
UNVOTE:

*sigh* Now I have to decide if Mirhawk's reaction was legitimate or not, and whether or not it overrides my concerns about his slot.

Boo.

In post 5415, Cerberus v666 wrote:

In post 5413, drmyshottyizsik wrote:also I'm pretty sure I didn't hammer

I know. There's only 5 votes on him total. Shoulda kept up the act longer though shotty.

Nah I got what I want. I had reason to believe he was telling the truth, but that seemed like a good opportunity to test the waters.
VOTE: flubber feels like a good vote after the fake l-1

In post 5418, drmyshottyizsik wrote:

In post 5415, Cerberus v666 wrote:

In post 5413, drmyshottyizsik wrote:also I'm pretty sure I didn't hammer

I know. There's only 5 votes on him total. Shoulda kept up the act longer though shotty.

Nah I got what I want. I had reason to believe he was telling the truth, but that seemed like a good opportunity to test the waters.
VOTE: flubber feels like a good vote after the fake l-1

...

What? you want to vote for the person who was obviously doing their *own* reaction test? For...doing the reaction test? The one you participated in?

Wtf?

uhhh no, his l-1 post come across as sincere, why are you so quick to deffend him?

Because my first thought when I saw that was "no, it's not L-1, good luck with the gambit though flub".

What does the sincerity of the l-1 post have to do with his alignment?

if it is sincere it's not a reaction test or a gambit

Oh ok well I am counterclaiming flubber's tracker. I await your response flubber :^)

In post 5422, drmyshottyizsik wrote:if it is sincere it's not a reaction test or a gambit

I should have stated that differently. What does the APPARENT sincerity of the L-1 have to do with his alignment? If it appears sincere, it was supposed to be. You don't know of that's because it WA a reaction test and he wanted people to believe him, or if it's because he sincerely believed it was L-1 (which I find improbable, given that there was a VC not very far back, with no votes since.)

If it WAS sincere because he somehow didn't know that, do you have any idea why scum would mame that post without knowing it was true?

Pedit: Flubber is a joat, so the assumption would be a 1 shot tracker and other abilities, versus your infinite tracking I assume, also wtf would you claim that right now when the ninja JUST died and thus your ability became especially useful?