Page 217 of 256

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:07 am
by NoPowerOverMe
In post 5397, davesaz wrote:
In post 5393, NoPowerOverMe wrote:@Grendal I was right re inviting outsiders.
In post 5394, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I got some criticism for saying it at the time but the fact is that it's not fair to give one player an advantage over another by bringing in a possibly perferred player(not saying Grendel was preferred in this instance, just as a principal).
What prompted you to bring this up?
Someone else brought it up

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:55 am
by TiphaineDeath
I feel ignored, VOTE: rude

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:56 am
by TiphaineDeath
Also@A50, how in the hell can you not call my last set of posts bringing something new to the table xD.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:20 pm
by a2rudeboy
In post 5401, TiphaineDeath wrote:I feel ignored, VOTE: rude
Don't worry Tiphaine, I'm still listening.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:23 pm
by pisskop
idk, I feel like we can almost spec out a win here.

How many players were in this, and how many scum is normal?

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:24 pm
by pisskop
21.

so 16:5
or 14:5:1:1
or some such.

5-7 non-green towns?

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:30 pm
by TiphaineDeath
There are probably between 4 and 6 scum total depending on 3P's and power.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:30 pm
by TiphaineDeath
Also, thank you rude xD.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 2:45 pm
by a2rudeboy
In post 5407, TiphaineDeath wrote:Also, thank you rude xD.
Any time. Promise I wont haunt you from the dead thread.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 2:49 pm
by pisskop
Who is scum. Can we not play the willing victim here?

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 2:58 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
Either way we are pretty damn close to winning especially if rude and death are scum.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:43 pm
by Bambi Jay
I did say at the beginning it could've been 4 scum 1 traitor. Or one 3p. Might very well be 4 scum tho.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:01 pm
by a2rudeboy
In post 5409, pisskop wrote:Who is scum. Can we not play the willing victim here?
Since I have currently voted Dave, one would believe that that is who I think is scum.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:40 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
Dave's not a lurker though so that's not consistent with your previous assumptions.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:44 pm
by a2rudeboy
Just so I have it clear.... I get called out for voting lurkers. I get called out for voting a non-lurker. K. Got it.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:51 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
So you're changing your philosophy because you got called out?

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:52 pm
by TiphaineDeath
Seriously, I am within 2%of giving up and deciding you are scum again NPOM, even though EVERY piece of VCA I can find says you're not, because you can't stop spewing red every time you post.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:54 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
lol

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:58 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
Yep I'm so scummy LOL

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 5:15 pm
by Doctor Drew
In post 5414, a2rudeboy wrote:Just so I have it clear.... I get called out for voting lurkers. I get called out for voting a non-lurker. K. Got it.
In post 5415, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So you're changing your philosophy because you got called out?
In post 5416, TiphaineDeath wrote:Seriously, I am within 2%of giving up and deciding you are scum again NPOM, even though EVERY piece of VCA I can find says you're not, because you can't stop spewing red every time you post.
Listen, I have been a card carrying member of the NPOM is scum for a good portion of the game. But as Days go by it, begrudgingly I know, seems as if that he isn't scum.

Rude, he brings up a good point that you immediately get super defensive about, and then TD races to defend you.

I stand by that the vote today should between those two.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 5:36 pm
by TiphaineDeath
I really don't get how you can look at NPOM's posting and see anything that resembles reasonability or town-signals Drew. I just don't know how to explain this any more clearly. He's either scum, or unimaginable dense, and I am currently choosing to believe the second, but every once in a while it jumps out and hits me in the face, and I don't like it.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 5:39 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
I think you just don't like being called out scum.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 5:46 pm
by Doctor Drew
In post 5420, TiphaineDeath wrote:I really don't get how you can look at NPOM's posting and see anything that resembles reasonability or town-signals Drew. I just don't know how to explain this any more clearly. He's either scum, or unimaginable dense, and I am currently choosing to believe the second, but every once in a while it jumps out and hits me in the face, and I don't like it.
I am not looking at quality of play, just if I believe if he is scum or not. The fact that you seem to lean that he isn't scum, yet still want to vote him is definitely a thing.

Also you literally just contradicted yourself. Yo first say that he hasn't done anything townie...then say you don't believe he is scum.

Scum slip ftw?

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:22 pm
by TiphaineDeath
Are you fucking kidding me? I've been saying that FOR AGES. That's not a goddamn scumslip. Have you gone full head-up-the-ass here or are you actively trolling me?

I want to vote him, because I hate that EVERYTHING HE DOES READS AS SCUM TO ME.

I haven't, because my VCA, which I am trusting more, says he is town.

This isn't that hard to understand if you try for two seconds, I swear to fuck.

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:23 pm
by TiphaineDeath
Am I the only sane one left in this game? I think the answer must be yes because it was just me and DGB and some idiot killed her....