Posted: Wed May 22, 2019 6:33 am
rc literally just doesnt have time to playIn post 5421, TemporalLich wrote:I still think RC is scummier than PB or Clemency.
RC doesn't seem like his town self.
-TL
rc literally just doesnt have time to playIn post 5421, TemporalLich wrote:I still think RC is scummier than PB or Clemency.
RC doesn't seem like his town self.
-TL
RC has been sick and he’s still forcing himself to play, in spite of that.In post 5425, Skygazer wrote:rc literally just doesnt have time to playIn post 5421, TemporalLich wrote:I still think RC is scummier than PB or Clemency.
RC doesn't seem like his town self.
-TL
Let's assume there is only 1 scum in the coalition. (there can be 2 or 3 but it isn't likely)In post 5424, Titus wrote:4 coalition veto is the point...
Consensus veto is good imo. Our reads are forced to get better.
We'll redo the coalition tomorrow and have a gameplan.
If we assume 1 scum in the original coalition, we wind up doing the second one one the outsiders.In post 5428, Time Devil wrote:Let's assume there is only 1 scum in the coalition. (there can be 2 or 3 but it isn't likely)In post 5424, Titus wrote:4 coalition veto is the point...
Consensus veto is good imo. Our reads are forced to get better.
We'll redo the coalition tomorrow and have a gameplan.
There must be a townie that survives the veto.
Town maybe eliminates the veto if the second Coalition fails, leading to a mislynch. (or 2 mislynches if the veto is horrible)
-TL
What happened to me not being "my town self?" You dropped that out of the blue despite me doing absolutely nothing to change that viewIn post 5421, TemporalLich wrote:I still think RC is scummier than PB or Clemency.
RC doesn't seem like his town self.
-TL
You'll need the repicker to understand and agree with this when they sub in as they need to repick in the night. If they don't we'd have to stall with another event that has no NK like protect.In post 5424, Titus wrote:4 coalition veto is the point...In post 5416, Time Devil wrote:Titus's veto is a bad veto.In post 5415, NanceFloor wrote:He just said he would vote Titus coalition.
It's a 4 coalition veto and it reeks of consensus.
-TL
Consensus veto is good imo. Our reads are forced to get better.
We'll redo the coalition tomorrow and have a gameplan.
Yes it isIn post 5406, NanceFloor wrote:Scum is extremely aware of the mechanics and it really is not in their best interests to point this out.
For fame.In post 5433, RadiantCowbells wrote:i can't remember why i wanted to play mafia ever
Changes:In post 5350, BNL wrote:
Mod notes:Yes.She will be replaced soon if she doesn't respond.
Depending on the situation, I may extend the deadline.
In post 5412, Time Devil wrote:VOTE: Chemist1422, Creature, Moongrass, RadiantCowbells
RC's veto doesn't have Chemist
-TL
In post 5398, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Anyway, I had an epiphany last night that has been validated time and time again by my experience in mafia, that I should always trust my initial instincts.
VOTE: Time Devil, Creature, Chemist, Clemency
I still think Moon could be scum but him correctly pointing out that having less than 3 coalition members in veto is pointless, makes him less likely to be scum than TD, so I prefer this.
4 voting this now.