Posted: Sat May 07, 2022 4:04 am
Voting anyone here is a bad idea util ydrasse confesses their guilty
IIn post 5423, SCP 682 wrote:hastily drawn reasons
Add in the reaction to my earlier push.In post 5423, SCP 682 wrote:you vote FL on the basis of the GS claim -> get proven that FL crumbed a role already -> still maintain the push based on hastily drawn reasons
thats a scumclaim folks
In post 5425, MegAzumarill wrote:Voting anyone here is a bad idea util ydrasse confesses their guilty
Voting is the supreme form of talking.In post 5430, MegAzumarill wrote:Voting isn't talking and that was me
VOTE: NashvilleIn post 5429, Nashville Dreams wrote:In post 5425, MegAzumarill wrote:Voting anyone here is a bad idea util ydrasse confesses their guilty
Better than not voting yesterday.In post 5434, Enchant wrote:VOTE: NashvilleIn post 5429, Nashville Dreams wrote:In post 5425, MegAzumarill wrote:Voting anyone here is a bad idea util ydrasse confesses their guilty
Stop me
?In post 5431, Nashville Dreams wrote:Koba, give me this one, please?
We did Toog yesterday.
But whyIn post 5443, SCP 682 wrote:but overall i am not wholly unopposed to yeeting meg
Says who?In post 5445, SCP 682 wrote:i specifically recommended investigatives check StD and im disappointed they didnt tho btw
? both claimed mafia specific investigatives claimed to check FL here.In post 5446, Nashville Dreams wrote:Says who?In post 5445, SCP 682 wrote:i specifically recommended investigatives check StD and im disappointed they didnt tho btw
Then, vote Meg with me. Pray Ydrasse withdraws or lies about the guilty for reactions and reveals the truth at midday so we can scumhunt.In post 5442, SCP 682 wrote:i mean tbh i think mena is the more blatant one and is in his lurkscum meta atm and prob went into antispew bc ydra guilty is likely on him lol
*pats you* Not sure I totally trust everything but I get the feeling this is near role madness with everyone having a vt or weak role.In post 5447, SCP 682 wrote:? both claimed mafia specific investigatives claimed to check FL here.In post 5446, Nashville Dreams wrote:Says who?In post 5445, SCP 682 wrote:i specifically recommended investigatives check StD and im disappointed they didnt tho btw