Page 23 of 41
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:47 pm
by Gorrad
ZEEnon wrote:Gorrad wrote:Yeah, try reading the rest of that paragraph. I didn't find him particularly so either, just a gut. I was simply stating that your sentence in 532, "Notice how PhilyEc is the only person besides me to bring attention to Gorrad?", is completely irrelevant. It's wrong, and even if it was right it would make no sense as a scumtell.
I've gotten night killed for almost knowing both the mafia in my first game.
Ask Green Crayons, he's the one that killed me.
That's nice. How is it at all relevant to the current situation?
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:55 pm
by ZEEnon
Korlash wrote:The main hollow of the contest was a MG... what do you mean it likely isn't in here? that's complete Bullshit. It's the most obvious choice for any GF or high ranking scum role. It's the main enemy Ichigo and uryu have to take down during their contest. it's the main freaking bad guy of season 1... How can you say you've speculated for a while and done reasearch and have come to the conclusion it's not likely in the set-up?
I'm not sure Korlash.
All I can say is that my role doesn't dance around the main plot
this theme game seems to be focused around either, and seems related to his role in a way.
Korlash wrote:how do you "almost know" both the mafia?
Bad wording. I almost..
outed
the mafia.
I died during the night without properly adressing my suspicions.
I did post my concerns about Charrat being mafia, and my suspicions of Green Crayons.
I got night killed before I could explain, however.
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:57 pm
by ZEEnon
Gorrad wrote:That's nice. How is it at all relevant to the current situation?
You asked me why you would kill PhilyEc. I answered.
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:58 pm
by Xtoxm
GLaDOS wrote:... Processing ...
I want a full-claim from Xtoxm. To this day, I have never seen somebody in a position where they are about to be lynched who was better off not claiming their role, especially this early in a game.
~
I am perfectly fine with posts like the one Mastin just posted. Seeing a thought-process can be more helpful than seeing the product sometimes.
However, please stop speculating what roles you think people might have (such as your Mason group speculation). This definitely seems to be a bad habit of yours in this game. If people drop tells/hints for their roles, it is because they
do not
want them pointed out – and chances are they know more about when information is relevant to point out more than you do. If you finding completely
inconsistent
tells then that could be different, as there you may be dealing with somebody trying to set up multiple avenues for fake-claims. Just be sure to use judgment.
~
I have not yet seen a real reason to suspect Korlash of being scum. I would appreciate seeing some reasoning, or being pointed to reasoning.
I have explicitly stated I am not claiming. This is a likely scum setting up the "if you're not going to claim then i'm going to vote you".
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:02 pm
by Xtoxm
And seriously, calling me Jester is beyond old. Every fucking game. Find something new.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:00 am
by Albert B. Rampage
He's not a jester, wow. Gorrad, Erg0 and Korlash are town.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:00 am
by Albert B. Rampage
Zeenon and Mastin are most likely town too.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:09 am
by Xtoxm
Mastin, Zee, GC..And prob Jebus and Abr town.
Korlash is acting wierd but there's a role I think he might be.
Gor, Dos my current picks.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:11 am
by Albert B. Rampage
Dos as in Gladdos. Why do you suspect Gladdos, Xtoxm?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:16 am
by Xtoxm
Her last post looks like a pre-emptive excuse. Overall her play doesn't strike me as town, either.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:21 am
by Xtoxm
I looked at Phil again, he prob didn't have a guilty but Gor still looks like scum.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:25 am
by Albert B. Rampage
For my part, I find this post extremely scummy:
GLaDOS wrote:... Processing ...
Short on time, but I do not believe that PhilyEc had a guilty result on Gorrad.
First, PhilyEc made about 4 substantive posts on Day Two before ever voting for Gorrad. Second, PhilyEc switched from Gorrard to Seraphim as Day Two come to a close. Perhaps just as importantly, we
did
just lynch a scum Redirector – this casts doubt onto all investigations done on Night One, even
if
PhilyEc did have such a result.
For the record, though, if I were to speculate as to PhilyEc’s result, it would probably have been an innocent investigation on Albert B. Rampage, given the contrast of language we have from PhilyEc’s last post on Day One, which was
Post 252, and PhilyEc’s first post on Day Two, which was
Post 283.
In this post, Gladdos:
1) Indirectly defends (her scumbuddy) Xtoxm.
2) Proves how she found out PhilyEc was the cop.
3) Tries to appeal to me by saying that PhilyEc got an innocent result on me.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:27 am
by Xtoxm
That last bit of it might be onto something.
Not scum, but hows it defend me?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:34 am
by Xtoxm
Abr, if you have meta/behavioral on me, do it better. If you think you have role info on me, it can't possibly be accurate.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:35 am
by Albert B. Rampage
Xtoxm wrote:That last bit of it might be onto something.
Not scum, but hows it defend me?
We know that there was a scum re-director, which renders suspicious all investigations done on night 1. You speculated on who the cop might have investigated, and I called it out as being scummy. According to me. And it doesn't matter whether I'm right or wrong, because, only a few posts later, Gladdos chimes in and also does the very same thing I called you out on. The result of this deliberate action was to take pressure off of you. At this point, you only had 2 votes on you, Xtoxm. Gladdos was trying to nip the bandwagon in the bud here.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:41 am
by Xtoxm
I hadn't really thought about the redirector, but I think the chances of him targetting Phil are pretty low. He took a lot of heat D1. And it's natural to try and figure out a cops results if he dies.
I'm gonna ask the mod a question bout redirection too. Prob get a stupid can't tell you that again though...
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:43 am
by Albert B. Rampage
Ya know what, just be a man and claim.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:47 am
by Xtoxm
Spirit Enabler
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:59 am
by Albert B. Rampage
???
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:04 am
by ZEEnon
Xtoxm wrote:Spirit Enabler
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:05 am
by Xtoxm
Sigh..
Well, I bring out someone's latent abilities, if they have any. My targets both have given no idication that they got anything.
Atleast redirector is dead, alive claimed with that around scum could make themselves very powerful.
I've been interested to know if latent abilities are public knowledge. Is anyone aware that they have a latent ability? I suspect not.
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:11 am
by Albert B. Rampage
ZEEnon, do you confirm this?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:23 am
by Korlash
I'm a spirit enabler BTW... How likely do you think we have two in this game?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:25 am
by Xtoxm
It's possible. I mean, if I just described you're role perfectly, do you really think that's a fluke?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:27 am
by Xtoxm
No opinions GC? I saw you browsing...