Mafiascum.net

↑ scooby wrote:Next time I should not post anything. Would it be better?

It would be about the same. If you don't tell us your reasons, we don't know which players are scummiest, noone can discuss or argue with your reads and you can't persuade anyone. I look forward to seeing your reasoning.

As for why I unvoted; SC has looked pretty good today. The way he's backtracked over DV since he's been attacked (513, 532, 534) a) fits very well with my picture of this game, and b) is the kind of thing that would draw attention to scum. I'd expect scum here to be explaining themselves, and trying to be consistent from here on; SC looks like he's actually trying to work out who's scum. Also, I think NS is really scummy.

↑ DeasVail wrote:Isn't it basically the same as other attacks on Nobody Special (such as yours)?

Yes, I understand.

↑ Nocmen wrote:

↑ Nobody Special wrote:

↑ petroleumjelly wrote:

↑ petroleumjelly wrote:

4.)

Nobody Special, on Day One your vote remained on StevieT92 (and you even seemed to make a “case” on him in Post 258), but despite not mentioning Ankamius in any of your posts, you immediately voted DeasVail in Post 292 when he replaced in, and then you put CooLDoG at L-1 (who you had also never expressed suspicion of). You did this without ever trying to push your supposed top suspect, StevieT92. Why?

DeasVail, upon replacing in, acted scummy enough to deserve my vote. On my re-read, I decided CoolDog was the lynch to work for.

These two shining examples of scumminess far outshine Stevie, who, while less luminous, is still in my notes to be watched.

I simply cannot answer any better than that.

Yet...what about SC, when SC did the exact similar? If that's part of the reason you vote SC now, why shouldn't we use that same case against you?

Which then brings me to SC: Is there other examples from NS that have a case which is unlike one that could have the same reasoning on you?

Not that I can think of without me being constantly pulled for morning chores. Yes, my DeasVail case turned out to be crummy, and yes, I could have done better with the CooLDoG hammer. After I read the flavor source, it's really the claim that kicked it for me. However, what I feel is starting to work in my favor is that I'm inquiring about my suspects, while Nobody Special seems to like shooting first and ask questions later.

Nocmen's pointing out Nobody Special's hypocrisy is interesting and I want to see the latter's response.

PJ, I honestly see no reason why I should do that.
Pj =/= Kcdaspot
So I see no reason why I should make a case on kcda only to have PJ answer it.

.

First of all, for all intents and purposes I Kcdaspot for this game. And second, I asked you that question because I don't see a single thing that is scummy about Kcdaspot's post, much less what could possibly be "really scummy." You don't need to "make a case" on me, but you need to explain yourself.

After we lynch nobody special we lynch kiwieagle who immediately bussed his buddy with little reasoning

Stevie stop OMGUSing ^.^

↑ petroleumjelly wrote:

Unvote: Nobody Special, Vote: kiwieagle

.

First of all, for all intents and purposes I

am

Kcdaspot for this game. And second, I asked you that question because I don't see a single thing that is scummy about Kcdaspot's post, much less what could possibly be "really scummy." You don't need to "make a case" on me, but you

do

need to explain yourself.

You obviously dont see anything scum in posts

↑ StevieT92 wrote:After we lynch nobody special we lynch kiwieagle who immediately bussed his buddy with little reasoning

↑ StevieT92 wrote:

Vote: Nobody Special

for doing nothing but bandwagonning who other people have said is scum.

↑ kiwieagle wrote:

Vote Nobody Special

loltoldyouguyhewasnotscumsighyouneverlistentome

↑ kiwieagle wrote:

↑ Nobody Special wrote:

unvote


Vote: CoolDog

Come on, just one more

What the fuck?


COOLDOG IS A FUCKIN MISLYNCH. WHOEVER HAMMERS IS A COMPLETE RETARD.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

Also:

↑ kiwieagle wrote:NS is scummmm


Stevie is busing.

That is all

↑ StevieT92 wrote:After we lynch nobody special we lynch kiwieagle who immediately bussed his buddy with little reasoning

LOLOLOOLOLLOLOLOOLOLOLOLLOLOLLOLO

↑ kiwieagle wrote:

↑ petroleumjelly wrote:

Unvote: Nobody Special, Vote: kiwieagle

.

First of all, for all intents and purposes I

am

Kcdaspot for this game. And second, I asked you that question because I don't see a single thing that is scummy about Kcdaspot's post, much less what could possibly be "really scummy." You don't need to "make a case" on me, but you

do

need to explain yourself.

You obviously dont see anything scum in

"your"

posts

OK, that's just flippant.

Kiwi, can I ask this again, what made you believe CooLDoG was a mislynch.

Prod dodge.

Nothing much of interest has happened.

The way his wagon started/the way people voted him.

Gut, I guess?

and since when is being flippant = scum?

↑ Nobody Special wrote:Prod dodge.

Nothing much of interest has happened.

HMMM

WHY NOT EXPLAIN YOUR vOTE?

↑ kiwieagle wrote:and since when is being flippant = scum?

petroleumjelly is biased toward himself like you are biased toward yourself, I am biased toward myself, etc. If you're going to attack petroleumjelly, write up a case on him and present it; don't give us the impression that you think he is an idiot for not seeing his own flaws.

I don't like the NS wagon. I think we need to look somewhere else. I'm in approval of kiwi for this, but I'm intending to read SC again soon.

↑ Riceballtail wrote:I don't like the NS wagon. I think we need to look somewhere else. I'm in approval of kiwi for this, but I'm intending to read SC again soon.

Please, explain why you don't like it. Because right now, I'm fine with it.

I don't really get the NS wagon to be honest, unless it's "NS is anti-town. LYNCH HIM!" -In this case I totally get it.

kiwieagle, answer my question:

3.)

kiwieagle, in Post 240 when you were making a case on StevieT92, you mentioned offhand that there was a Kcdaspot post that was “really scummy.” Presumably, you were referring to Post 53. Please explain what is “really scummy” about this post.

Nobody Special, answer my questions:

Nobody Special,

->

a.)

How is it on Day One (as of November 13) you accused yourself of "tunneling" against StevieT92, but on Day Two (November 22) when you were asked what you thought about StevieT92, your answer was simply that you "haven't looked at him lately"?

->

b.)

You claim you have "notes." Mind sharing a few that you haven't said anything about, then? Because based on your play and the fact that you continually fall back on the "I need to reread X" excuse, I am not really convinced you are keeping tabs on this game.

->

c.)

What is your opinion of Riceballtail?

Riceballtail, answer my question:

I want to know if you actually have something to back up your claim that scooby has committed “several” scumtells, or if you are just lying. Since there are “several,” please pick two and explain them.

If you spot any mistakes, please let me know.

Due to the American holidays, I may be a little late with votecounts etc. (hopefully not) and will be purposefully lax on prods until Monday.

↑ petroleumjelly wrote:

1.)

kiwieagle, answer my question:

3.)

kiwieagle, in Post 240 when you were making a case on StevieT92, you mentioned offhand that there was a Kcdaspot post that was “really scummy.” Presumably, you were referring to Post 53. Please explain what is “really scummy” about this post.

[/quote]






Seriously, can you do something other than ask questions?
I think he was scummy because he tried to buddy with stevie?
IS it that hard to see?

↑ kiwieagle wrote:Seriously, can you do something other than ask questions?

What's wrong with petroleumjelly asking questions? It's a good way to get information from other players.

↑ kiwieagle wrote:I think he was scummy because he tried to buddy with stevie?

I don't like the final question mark here, nor do I feel this adequately answers petroleumjelly's question (though he's the real judge here). What about Kcdaspot's buddying StevieT92 is "really scummy"?

↑ DeasVail wrote:I don't really get the NS wagon to be honest, unless it's "NS is anti-town. LYNCH HIM!" -In this case I totally get it.

I want to hear his answers to a few questions. If he comes in and says that he doesn't want to reply to them, as I understood from his last post, I'll pressure him to.

↑ StrangerCoug wrote:

↑ kiwieagle wrote:Seriously, can you do something other than ask questions?

What's wrong with petroleumjelly asking questions? It's a good way to get information from other players.

↑ kiwieagle wrote:I think he was scummy because he tried to buddy with stevie?

I don't like the final question mark here, nor do I feel this adequately answers petroleumjelly's question (though he's the real judge here). What about Kcdaspot's buddying StevieT92 is "really scummy"?

1. But you never get information from him?

petroleumjelly provided information of his own. Read his ISO.

Answer my other question: What about Kcdaspot's buddying StevieT92 is "really scummy"?