Mafiascum.net

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

You're so full of shit.

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

Explain?

In post 551, fferyllt wrote:

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

Explain?

No please don't, I'd rather not listen to more bullshit.

Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're opportunistic as fuck.

VOTE: orc

I swear it feels like half the players of this game are scum.

In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're

opportunistic

as fuck.

VOTE: orc

How exactly am I opportunistic?

fferyllt wrote:

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

Explain?

His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.

What do you think of Buldermar's vote?

In post 555, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

fferyllt wrote:

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

Explain?

His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.

I've been thinking that his play in this game seems different from the early borkgame where he tunneled you/me over a symbolic construct of something you hadn't meant and arguably hadn't said.

Thoughts on pirate mollie?

What do you think of Buldermar's vote?

Not liking it.

Pmollie is basically nonexistent and probably needs to post more.

Majiffy pushing for DCL is rubbing me the wrong way, and I don't see why he's sheeping mollie so blatantly on the buldermar read.

Would you be open to a buld lynch?

He's still null overall. The lack of synch on his and my reads is troubling, but I don't know that it's scummy. figuring him out seems to eat up most of my bandwidth. You'd think with 150+ posts to look at I could get a decent read. Going to reread his posts in context and have another and closer look at Majiffy and Mollie.

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

You bin' huffin' glue again, boy?

In post 555, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.

If you're going to reference the worst scum game I've ever had to play, you could at least offer some quotes.

In post 557, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:and I don't see why he's sheeping mollie so blatantly on the buldermar read.

... I have him listed as scum. Mollie has him listed as town.

Sure, but you're fixated on your other scum read DCL because mollie is townreading buld.

I assumed that's also why you're not pressuring buldermar right now. Am I wrong?

You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.

In post 555, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're

opportunistic

as fuck.

VOTE: orc

How exactly am I opportunistic?

fferyllt wrote:

In post 549, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Majiffy

Explain?

His play seems like his play in borkgame where tunneling is concerned, and the game needs a bit of a shakeup.

What do you think of Buldermar's vote?

Lol, so what happened to "My vote is firmly placed on your for the rest of this day"?

In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.

What are you not liking about it?

In post 561, Majiffy wrote:You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.

Hahaha.. Not in a million years would you refrain from pushing my lynch as town only because mollie thinks I'm town. No way.

In post 563, buldermar wrote:

In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.

What are you not liking about it?

I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.

Guess we're in some kind of alternate dimension, Buldermar, because that's exactly what I'm doing.

In post 565, fferyllt wrote:

In post 563, buldermar wrote:

In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.

What are you not liking about it?

I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.

You said you weren't certain the last time I asked. What changed?

In post 567, buldermar wrote:

In post 565, fferyllt wrote:

In post 563, buldermar wrote:

In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.

What are you not liking about it?

I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.

You said you weren't certain the last time I asked. What changed?

Nothing has changed. I am not certain, but I don't think I am wrong.

Is this a semantic quibble?

In post 564, buldermar wrote:

In post 561, Majiffy wrote:You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.

Hahaha.. Not in a million years would you refrain from pushing my lynch as town only because mollie thinks I'm town. No way.

I'm inclined to agree with this

In post 568, fferyllt wrote:

In post 567, buldermar wrote:

In post 565, fferyllt wrote:

In post 563, buldermar wrote:

In post 556, fferyllt wrote:Not liking it.

What are you not liking about it?

I don't think I'm wrong about orcinus.

You said you weren't certain the last time I asked. What changed?

Nothing has changed. I am not certain, but I don't think I am wrong.

Is this a semantic quibble?

UNVOTE:

If he ends up being lynched and flips scum you can consider my vote on you unless a really good reason not to presents itself.

In post 569, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 564, buldermar wrote:

In post 561, Majiffy wrote:You're not wrong, but "sheeping" and trusting someone with different player strengths (reading meta of players she often plays with to a high degree of accuracy) to read someone until proven incapable or otherwise untrustworthy is a very large logical leap.

Hahaha.. Not in a million years would you refrain from pushing my lynch as town only because mollie thinks I'm town. No way.

I'm inclined to agree with this

See this is the problem. Now I'm thinking that the only reason you're agreeing is because Majiffy is your new retardo-tunnel-target, which still makes your read absolutely useless to me.

In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're opportunistic as fuck.

VOTE: orc

yeah its almost as if he final voted and then changed his mind or something!

In post 573, pirate mollie wrote:

In post 553, buldermar wrote:Actually fuck this. You don't push a wagon like crazy and declare your vote permanently placed on someone only to vote someone else without any explanation as town. You're opportunistic as fuck.

VOTE: orc

yeah its almost as if he final voted and then changed his mind or something!

That's essentially what he did, but ff says he's town and I havn't found much reason to think she's scum other than that one thing I've already mentioned.