Mafiascum.net

Full flavor claim please?

Claiming neutral, then demanding that a Vigi goes on one of the most pro-town players in the game at this moment in time?
Not to mention your flip-flopping makes me think Mitt Romney is part of your hydra.
I don't bye your claim one bit, and even if you are a neutral, why would you actively say you want a Vigi to kill what many players believe to be one of the most pro-town players at this point. Neutral or not, it seems you may be detrimental to our success.

UNVOTE: Ravenpaw
VOTE: GCBC

~Krabs

Whoa, I misinterpreted the Neutral claim badly lmao.

I still think that GCBC is acting passive-aggressive though.

In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:

I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.

It will hurt town if you don't...

You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them. If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now. You piss me off.

In fact:

Vig: Sven

Good riddance.

This was the icing on the cake.

Sorry.

In post 552, Krab Bucket wrote:Whoa, I misinterpreted the Neutral claim badly lmao.

I still think that GCBC is acting passive-aggressive though.

What exactly is passive-aggressive about using his ability to kill someone? That's about as far as you can get from passive.

In post 495, Amethyst Actor wrote:Why are the cops scum? they are null on my radar

I was wondering this for a little bit, too...then I realized he's doing a couple little things that set off my scumdar. And he's doing them more than once.

1) Lots of little "this looks scummy" implications without actually pursuing them. Looks like planting seeds for later "I told you so" sort of stuff.

2) "Look at me! I'm scumhunting!" That one sets me off more than the first one.

Undertaker v Shawn Michaels (Wrestlemania 26)

Alright, either that was a ruse or something else is going on here.

In post 558, Desperado wrote:Alright, either that was a ruse or something else is going on here.

I don't think GCBC is a vig. I think he was being demonstrative.

In post 559, The Goat wrote:

In post 558, Desperado wrote:Alright, either that was a ruse or something else is going on here.

I don't think GCBC is a vig. I think he was being demonstrative.

That wasn't the impression his post gave.

It was a reaction test.

In post 551, Krab Bucket wrote:Claiming neutral, then demanding that a Vigi goes on one of the most pro-town players in the game at this moment in time?
Not to mention your flip-flopping makes me think Mitt Romney is part of your hydra.
I don't bye your claim one bit, and even if you are a neutral, why would you actively say you want a Vigi to kill what many players believe to be one of the most pro-town players at this point. Neutral or not,

it seems you may be detrimental to our success.

UNVOTE: Ravenpaw
VOTE: GCBC

~Krabs

This is super scummy. You don't even know what's going on. You just saw an opportunity to vote me and did it.
I didn't ask a vig to kill anyone. I just "did it" myself.

The bolded is terrible. It's like you know i'm town and you're justifying a policy lynch.
VOTE: Krab

In post 561, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It was a reaction test.

Ah, I see what you were doing. Combined with Krab's earlier association with ferret, I think I'm going to move here

In post 555, Desperado wrote:

In post 552, Krab Bucket wrote:Whoa, I misinterpreted the Neutral claim badly lmao.

I still think that GCBC is acting passive-aggressive though.

What exactly is passive-aggressive about using his ability to kill someone? That's about as far as you can get from passive.

He's talking shit and he's obv scum.

---
@Goat - How is your first reaction to a Vig claim to vote the claimer?

1) Lots of little "this looks scummy" implications without actually pursuing them. Looks like planting seeds for later "I told you so" sort of stuff.

Makes sense!
This would only work if the people I was accusing were scum. Otherwise, how would I say told you so?

Apologies, don't have time to read all 23 pages, will get to it when I can.

@Ravenpaw what have I ignored? Just quote/say it again and I'll probably be happy to answer.

In post 490, Skullduggery wrote:When I said that I liked the cut of his jib, I was just saying that I liked FuDuzn as a person. That's all. It was not indicative of whether I thought he was Town or Scum at the time.

I don't like this for some reason. I mean, I think I get along with the majority of players on this site (though apparently I have a reputation as an asshole but that's not a discussion for here) but I wouldn't say that I like anyone 'cause I don't know them. And this is a mafia game...what does you liking a person have to do with anything?

In post 492, xMALCOLMx wrote:

In post 89, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like I'm in a RK game and no one wants to do anything for fear of coming across scummy.

That place hasn't closed yet?

nope. no mafia there 'cause its a ghost town.

In post 493, The Goat wrote:

In post 485, Nero Cain wrote:nope!!! Your vote was scummy just like my vote on skull was scummy. Only scum can be scummy.

:blank stare:

obviously I was mocking GCBC.

In post 505, Ravenpaw wrote:@Nero- Goat’s most recent post read as pretty genuine to me, what do you think?

Jury is still out. I 'preciate the town read but its not like its an impossibility for scum to call their attacker town to try and throw em' off.

22 and 23 later.

In post 552, Krab Bucket wrote:Whoa, I misinterpreted the Neutral claim badly lmao.

I still think that GCBC is acting passive-aggressive though.

You misinterpret his post but your vote is still on him? lol

In post 567, Nero Cain wrote:And this is a mafia game...what does you liking a person have to do with anything?

It doesn't have anything to do with anything. Ravenpaw asked me why I said it and that was the reason.

What's the problem here again?





How much of today's happenings were part of your reaction test? Just the fake vig shot or all the posts leading up to it (527, 530, 534, 535, 543, 544, 547, and 548)?

In post 527, GoodCopBadCop wrote:

@Skull

Skull wrote:Ferret's reaction has me thinking that he's probably Town. Seemed genuinely confused about the sudden wagon, so either he's legitimately baffled or he's a really good actor.

Which post did this happen in?

I was referring to these:

In post 468, ferretlover wrote:So I get back from school, and I get a wagon on me. lolwut

What is being expected of me currently? There are so many posts when I get back from school that I get overwhelmed. I have no idea what questions people are trying to ask me, because they are just getting boggled up with all of the other (for the lack of a better term) "filler" posts.

Could someone

please

make a post with the questions they would like me to answer, and I would be glad to comply.

In post 474, ferretlover wrote:Well, I just C+F'd ('cause I have a life and can't read through all of the posts right now) the last 10 pages, and didn't see any questions pertaining to me. Could someone just have some questions that you want me to answer?

Do you believe that this bewilderment is fabricated?

In post 519, ferretlover wrote:If I assumed that I could be able to shoot

anyone

, I would shoot myself. I haven't been helpful very much and need to be more actively scumhunting. If I couldn't shoot myself then I would have No Action.

In post 520, ferretlover wrote:This is assuming that the vigilante wouldn't be killed in this process, i.e. I either wasn't the vigilante or the role passed to someone else.

Did you just say that if you had a Vig shot, you would either shoot yourself with it or not use it at all? Are you serious? If I had a dollar for every brain you didn't have, I would have one dollar.

We're on Page 23. The game is almost a week old. I know for a fact that there is at least one person here that you find suspicious. If you're Town, then you know damn well that that person isn't you, so there is no reason for you to use a theoretical Vig shot on yourself. If you're saying you'd kill yourself because you don't want to play anymore, then replace out.

I do read you as Derptown at the moment, but if you don't step up your game in a hurry, I would not be opposed to policy lynching you for being a buffoon.





I need an answer to this:

In post 490, Skullduggery wrote:

In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post.

This..."trap" of yours has one glaring flaw: it can catch both Town and Scum indiscriminately. How do you intend to tell the difference between the players who have fallen for your masterful mental machinations?

Don't think that it's a rhetorical question just because I worded it in a joking manner. I want to know the full extent of this "trap" you had planned.

I would advise you to choose your words carefully. After GCBC's gamble revealed your opportunism, you are treading on very thin ice right now.

I'm not saying I don't want to play, I'm saying that I should be helping more. JMHO.

In post 564, GoodCopBadCop wrote:

In post 555, Desperado wrote:

In post 552, Krab Bucket wrote:Whoa, I misinterpreted the Neutral claim badly lmao.

I still think that GCBC is acting passive-aggressive though.

What exactly is passive-aggressive about using his ability to kill someone? That's about as far as you can get from passive.

He's talking shit and he's obv scum.

---
@Goat - How is your first reaction to a Vig claim to vote the claimer?

1) Lots of little "this looks scummy" implications without actually pursuing them. Looks like planting seeds for later "I told you so" sort of stuff.

Makes sense!
This would only work if the people I was accusing were scum. Otherwise, how would I say told you so?

You weren't a vig.

I figured that out when the mod showed up, and the person you said to vig didn't die and stuff.

In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:

I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.

It will hurt town if you don't...

You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them.

If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now

. You piss me off.

In fact:

Vig: Sven

Good riddance.

Here's the other part that clued me in.

In post 524, Svenskt Stål wrote:I think it refers to game setups where there are other factions then just town/scum. Like SK, neutrals, seperate scum factions.

Ah okay, thanks for clearing that up for me.

In post 544, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Also, Sven stop posting so much. You're responsible for more than 1/5 of all the posts.

Why is posting a lot a bad thing? His posts have been helpful.