Mafiascum.net

I'll sheep a good scum-Titus case

anyone have one?

But we're lynching Zoid today. Someone can just shoot Titus tonight.

Ah. Titus replaced wayne?
Hmm I don't like the wayne wagon but i approve of any wagon on Titus

oh well
UNVOTE: Zoidberg
VOTE: Titus

lynching zoid would be me being lazy 'cause I'm doing the exact same thing as him.

What wagon? A wagon with 0 votes is not a wagon Saki. What have I done that's suspicious? You said you didn't like the wagon on my predecessor, who was being a troll and drawing a lot of heat. Yet you like a non-existent wagon on me?

Titus's second rule of mafia again.

Titus wrote:What have I done that's suspicious?

you done something suspicious?

In post 557, Saki wrote:

Titus wrote:What have I done that's suspicious?

Have

you done something suspicious?

No. That's why I asked you to support you starting a wagon on me.

In post 558, Titus wrote:

In post 557, Saki wrote:

Titus wrote:What have I done that's suspicious?

Have

you done something suspicious?

No. That's why I asked you to support you starting a wagon on me.

You don't think any parts of your recent posts have been suspicious at all?

No and the fact you had to beg for a case on me shows you have no case, because I am not scum. You said you didn't like the waynegg wagon, which is the link to the case you got. Regardless of what anyone said, you planned to vote me.

Feel free to highlight anything I've done that you think makes me suspicious. Considering you said you didn't like the wagon on waynegg, limit it to my posts. You should also limit it to "recent posts" since that's where you're implying my suspicious behavior is but I understand if you can't make your fabrication there.

In post 554, Formerfish wrote:

@Mod- Your player list has me replacing Hydra and not Mitzi, what's up?

In post 540, Hydrochloric Hydra wrote:Huh.
Sup guys

Is this really all you have to say?

In post 547, Titus wrote:Doh! I fell to the same tactic I was worried about; making people think the votes were different than reality. That was a terribly misleading post by Zoidberg.

Technically, there was no need to vote twice according to your ISO. However, the host had your vote in the wrong place. Zoidberg uses that to give me the false impression you were trying to run up his train. Yet, you were just correcting his vote.

So you just weren't paying attention, basically. Understandable. How likely do you think it is that Zoidberg simply wasn't paying attention either?

Although I find Zoidberg scummy, I do acknowledge the possibility that 525 was just a case of him not paying attention and thinking that Desperado was intentionally being misleading when, in reality, Desperado was just making sure his vote was on the right place. It sounds to me like you're voting for Zoidberg for doing the same thing that you are. Why is he scummy for it but not you?

In my case, there was a total lack of intent to make the mistake and I gained nothing. In Zoidberg's case, he gains possibly derailing the train on him but I will admit that he could have made an innocent mistake. Setting that aside, I do believe my vote was on Zoidberg prior to that fiasco because of his denial that anything happened so far in the thread.

You'll also notice that Zoidberg has mysteriously vanished from the thread again.

I wouldn't be surprised if Zoid was jester.

In post 564, SalmonellaDoctor wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if Zoid was jester.

I have no idea why you would think that..

I dont find him scummy, I think he is inactive, not scummy.

Skull has a great point about Baby Spice and more votes should go there.
Formerfish, that amished tell was noted ("I know my predecessor was bad...") We have some confidence in you being scum.

Actually, I think the case on Hydro case makes sense, but I think Baby Spice could be scum as well. SO IDK.

-DP

In post 555, Saki wrote:Ah. Titus replaced wayne?
Hmm I don't like the wayne wagon but i approve of any wagon on Titus

oh well
UNVOTE: Zoidberg
VOTE: Titus

lynching zoid would be me being lazy 'cause I'm doing the exact same thing as him.

This post doesnt make any sense...
Why do you want Titus lynched if you dont even have reasons for her being scum?

i say we lynch Titus
if Titus isn't scum she ends up being mafia-ally townie

Said Ms. "I always play like crap on Day One."

Coming off V/LA today, posting when I get home.

I'm open to questions and stuff.
Formerfish's opening seems off.

Why did you fake DUDE?

That post restriction of YOURS?

In post 536, Skullduggery wrote:

In post 529, JasonWazza wrote:Baby spice is right REGARDLESS.

Even if her vote's WRONG.

What is she right about -- Hydrochloric being scummy or SD being scummy? Either way, why is a vote on SD wrong?

You being stupid on PURPOSE?

Take a look at VOTES.

Where do they stand FOOL?

Now a small jump COMES.

And you get the ANSWER.

So why the pointless QUESTIONS?

Because, Jason, fuck, everyone's got a cool ass post restriction and we are VTs

Then what made you STOP?

Exactly when BS mentioned META.

That the mod has FOOL.

Where one post restriction SCUM.

Exists, what motivated that MOVE?

I kind of forgot we were faking and posted normally and fucked up