wut
In post 9, BBmolla wrote:Haha
...
Haha yeah
...
N's notable
Making things quotable
Reading the game when I'm not playing dota (bull)
Sleepykrew
Becomes stu
Dayvigged in like post 2
Just kidding
I'm bidding
On this getting crazy at this sitting
Wish the dayvig was real
Before thelove I would kneel
Cause Skrew got a role pm that says he's vile as veal
...
Word up
VOTE: Sleepykrew
:goodposting:
In post 44, DeasVail wrote:I think you are trying to follow the status quo in regard to SleepyKrew, but unlike others, you are trying very hard to rationalize it.
In post 43, PeaceBringer wrote:May as well run up the claim, so who hops on and who does not. Then we can sort out what scum is likely to do...
DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THE STATUS QUO TO ME
In post 45, PeaceBringer wrote:Sure, SleepyKrew can just be a naive moron who felt that was best thing to do. But let me ask you this, why if you have a negative utility role do you announce it? Does that make sense? Maybe you want to get run up, may be you want to see who jumps on, lots and lots of maybe's.
These all seem like town things to me.
In post 86, DeasVail wrote:At first, PeaceBringer is wondering why people are voting for SleepyKrew. It is quite strongly suggested by his posts that he didn't understand why himself. However, he then decides that a negative utility claim needs pressure, and it's quite clear that this belief has been influenced by the votes of others. If he already believed before this game that negative utility claims need pressure, than he would have understood the pressure on SleepyKrew without needing to ask for it. So, I am pretty sure that he didn't. Then, when one of the original SleepyKrew voters reveals that there is actually no good reason to make SleepyKrew claim, PeaceBringer stands strong in his belief that negative utility claims need pressure.
This was very likely not a belief of his before, so how did it become so strong? I think that this is because he was scum under the impression that this is what the townies were doing (when it wasn't) and after having justified his vote on the SleepyKrew wagon in such a way, he couldn't suddenly decide as scum that negative utility claims don't need pressure after all.
1) Why are his beliefs that negative utility claims need pressure determined by the votes of others? He ends up saying "claiming like that pretty much begs for votes, and even though they might just not be the sharpest knife in the knife drawer, might as well run them up anyway" which seems like a pretty original view.
2) Why would he justify his vote on the SleepyKrew wagon the way he did?
In post 89, dopog wrote:Not sure; "Fake pushing" for an "rvs" vote and when he's at like L-3/4 saying "I didn't know there were serious votes" sounds hecka artificial.
Not surprising; it's the RVS.
In post 89, dopog wrote:Overly "suprised" that BB (maybe others) are reading him as scum.
You don't really care about neromollie doing the same thing.
In post 90, DeasVail wrote:but I can't really get over how he continued to stand by SKrew needing to be pressured after it was revealed that no one was really interested in that.
When did you get over that?
In post 115, dopog wrote:1) pushed a wagon on someone jokingly;
~ which a) keeps rvs + fluff posting going which sucks whilst contrivedly looking helpful b) but is also in the wider scope indicitave of what you need to do as scum (get people lycnhed)
And yeah obv lycnhes don't usually come out of the biggest rvs wagon; But experientially/anecdotally scum sometimes do go "why aren't you voting this guy" for their first say five posts; and I reckon it's a semi-solid scumtell because it is scum motivated if not optimum play.
...
In post 115, dopog wrote:2) Was surprised about people scum reading SleepyKrew
~ which seems to indicate he probably knows that sleepykrew is town (or not on his scumteam, etc.)
...or he was still following that whole "fake pushing an RVS wagon" thing.
In post 121, Nani wrote:Vote: Peacebringer
Serous vote, stop shitty votes like the shark ones please.
Neroandmolly is town.
Do you have anything more?
In post 127, PeaceBringer wrote:oh and you really are not going to get much why outta me, I don't really share what goes on in my brain.
You say this, but we've gotten more out of others already.
In post 128, Katsuki wrote:
I wonder.
I do however have a hard time believing that a one-word post along with a vote is so hard to understand though.
I think that stubborn assholish Katsuki is a stronger sign of him being town; he's arrogant as hell as both alignments but knows that he's pretty lynchable so usually keeps his head down. The "I wonder" series was a good moment of him not keeping his head down.
MUTLEY
YOU KNOW YOU SURE AS HELL AREN'T GONNA MAKE A BIG BEAUTIFUL WALL
WHY DID YOU PROMISE US ONE AND DELIVER US NOTHING
In post 161, ooba wrote:Shadowy Poison - Town for echoing my thoughts on dopog=scum -> PB=scum
That's a bad reason to put someone as town unless you're actually correct.
What is this? Do you have anything to add to thread?
See my last post and worry no more.
In post 283, theloveofneroandmollie wrote: In post 282, PeaceBringer wrote: In post 280, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:Even if he had reason to believe that it was multiball, the town motivation of making that claim is what?
Scum often hint at there being a second killing faction early on.
a play like that from a reactions based player would be to get reactions and see what happens
but you've never played with Deas so why do you think he's a reaction based player?
So, we have more than one kill tonight. What does this say about Deas?
ZING
To be fair, I found Deas's multiball quote weird but it's because of something he does as writing style and not as either alignment
Why are you voting someone for posting meta?
In post 311, DeasVail wrote:If you're still somehow town, we can win this game together. You just have to trust me.
when my heart doesn't beat for you
i can't just trust a winkyface
In post 319, Dante wrote:Using meta to scum hunt on Day 1 is pointless.
Better off using the Magic 8-ball.
Pointless doesn't always equal scummy.
look at you
everything you post is pointless
but does that make you scum?
(maybe)
In post 326, Dante wrote:
Usually need blood in the water...but the 8-ball said you were scum so I'm sticking with that...
Pretend you're town for a moment, what are your thoughts?
NOPE TRY AGAIN
In post 331, Nani wrote:Why isn't Peace Bringer dead yet?
He voted a player who he thought he was town after he was pressured to make a stance, how obvious this can be?
He might die faster if you made a CASE or something like that.
I would quote the picture again but let's all be honest with each other here it's too fucking big to be posted again.
Why wouldn't you expect an married couple to have a son?
SEEMS SUSPICIOUS TO ME
KATS ;_;
WHY DO YOU JOIN THESE GAMES
IF ALL YOU ARE EVER GONNA DO
IS TROLL A LITTLE AND THEN REPLACE OUT
seven pages more
will i be able to make it?
am i good enough to make it?
actually no not way harder
In post 442, Nani wrote:I don't want to play with saki.
Mod, please replace me.
I don't see how you can *almost* come close to reading something but not quite make it.
unless you got hit with a 20 minute ninja
from what i understands, those guys are some motherfuckers
In post 479, mnemonicdevice wrote:Why are you fighting a town read on yourself DV?
A town read is a good thing, scum or not. The only time you wouldn't want a town read is if you are a jester.
not that he'll ever read this, but
jester suspicions?
really?
Peregrine's replace in is very underwhelming. I'm not *too* surprised there.
Talking with Mara there.
In post 500, Dante wrote:Personally, I'd rather vote using the Magic 8-ball scum detector than use some BS meta on day 1.
Voting on bullshit seems better than voting for ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL seems better to me, but.
Still don't like this.
In post 544, Shadowy Poison wrote:I think that nero/mollie is still really freaking town so I'm disengaging this 1v1 before it gets out of hand
Where have you been this game? Because you haven't done SHIT.
Done!
