Page 23 of 45

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:02 am
by Shiny Hydreigon
In post 542, Guyett wrote:But you shouldn't say I am not scum based on that one game lucky
i think this is town because scum will usually not disagree with a townread on them. town will because they question the intentions of the one townreading them. i've seen it used by scum exactly for this reason, but given i'm pretty confident guyett is town anyway, this just boosts my townread further.

R~

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:03 am
by Guyett
But why did you wait to bring that up? You were around when i posted that... Why wait for va to start your argument

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:15 am
by Lucky2u
In post 550, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:
In post 542, Guyett wrote:But you shouldn't say I am not scum based on that one game lucky
i think this is town because scum will usually not disagree with a townread on them. town will because they question the intentions of the one townreading them. i've seen it used by scum exactly for this reason, but given i'm pretty confident guyett is town anyway, this just boosts my townread further.

R~
Wait wait... Let me understand this post. Scum don't usually disagree with town reads on them. Town will disagree out of good paranoia. However you've seen scum question a town read on them to appear town themselves. So in other words "WIFOM WIFOM WIFOM"

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:18 am
by Shiny Hydreigon
you conveniently skipped the "guyett was a townread already so this only boosts the townread" part.

R~

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:22 am
by Lucky2u
You mean the prior prejudice that should only color your judgement as a whole not for an individual action.

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:24 am
by Shiny Hydreigon
i mean what i said.

also, is there a reason you ignored 551?

R~

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:37 am
by Lucky2u
Is he talking to me? I thought he was talking to you.

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:40 am
by Guyett
Yeah that was for lucky

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:45 am
by Lucky2u
Ok then I am misunderstanding. Wait to bring what up?

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:13 am
by Guyett
Your reaction to 542... You waited until va posted about it to address it

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:54 pm
by beastcharizard
Can someone explain the Cabd wagon to me?

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:06 pm
by Mononoke
Hey Cabd, when are you finishing with your catch up

~Sakura Hana

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 3:20 pm
by Cabd
In post 561, Mononoke wrote:Hey Cabd, when are you finishing with your catch up

~Sakura Hana
I got told my walls suck by your bitchy cheese-half and bert didn't like 'em either so fucks given to finish: 0
I'll just summarize reads later tonight.

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:35 pm
by Shiny Hydreigon
In post 560, beastcharizard wrote:Can someone explain the Cabd wagon to me?
Well, you see, some people have role pms that reads "Mafia" and those with a role pm of "Town" need to vote out said mafia
I got told my walls suck by your bitchy cheese-half and bert didn't like 'em either so fucks given to finish: 0
I'll just summarize reads later tonight.
QQ

~M~

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:48 pm
by Mononoke
In post 562, Cabd wrote:I got told my walls suck by your bitchy cheese-half and bert didn't like 'em either so fucks given to finish: 0
I'll just summarize reads later tonight.
waaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:49 pm
by Mononoke
well the bitchy cheese half is V/LA until Tuesday.

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:24 am
by beastcharizard
In post 527, Bert wrote:
In post 341, beastcharizard wrote:I feel I have posted enough for someone to at least have some type of read on me better than null because "they haven't seen me much."
that is just not acceptable because he/she hasn't been posting or giving us that much to work with for him to say such things like "IVE POSTED ENOUGH, YALL SHOULD HAVE A READ ON MWAH"
In post you say you don't like my ISO yet here you say you can't read me? Is that not a contradiction?

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 5:58 am
by Bert
In post 566, beastcharizard wrote:In post 524 you say you don't like my ISO yet here you say you can't read me? Is that not a contradiction?
<3

you haven't given us much to work with, but from what there is to work with, I am not fond of what you have posted

Love, Bert

Spoiler:
Image

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 5:59 am
by Viera Assassin
In post 548, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:
In post 545, Viera Assassin wrote:misread that.
yet your vote stays?

R~
Yes!

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:05 am
by Lucky2u
In post 559, Guyett wrote:Your reaction to 542... You waited until va posted about it to address it
Between 540 and 546 I don't post anything. Are you trying to imply that I was purposefully lurking? it's not like I have other posts between your 542 and me reacting to it in 546. I could not have reacted faster.

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:08 am
by Guyett
It was posted a minute after you posted and you next posted an hour later... you could have reacted but you let VA argue your 'case'

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:08 am
by Shiny Hydreigon
your 540 was posted
a minute before
541 and 542. that means you were around but chose not to reply to 542. yet you did address it when va addressed it.

R~

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:10 am
by Bert
Yeah....

I'm kinda paranoid about Guyett right now

Vote: Guyett


Guyett, who are your scumreads?

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:11 am
by Guyett
have you not read the thread?

Lucky
VA
Cabd

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:11 am
by Bert
In post 562, Cabd wrote:
In post 561, Mononoke wrote:Hey Cabd, when are you finishing with your catch up

~Sakura Hana
I got told my walls suck by your bitchy cheese-half and bert didn't like 'em either so fucks given to finish: 0
I'll just summarize reads later tonight.
Lol why am I not surprised...

it's Saturday <3

summary please!!!!!!!!!

!!!

or eat rope...