Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 3:34 pm
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
LolIn post 552, Zachstralkita wrote:#437 transcribed: His reads are too blatantly shit to be scum.
Also he's said a few quotes that make it very certain in my mind he's Town tbh... don't let that stop you though.
This is a bw of garbage and probably indirectly makes this slot town, even though i null read him.In post 550, GuyInFreezer wrote:Sickofit1138 (4): PeregrineV, Boem_u_dusi, Mirhawk, Dunnstral
Holy fuckballs batman!In post 89, Sickofit1138 wrote:ummm town wouldnt type a post to stand out, that outs attention on them and away from hunting actual scum. ... so it sounds like you are insinuating that he is scum. i think it could be that you are scum pushing against an early mislynch.
Gundam. I rest my case.In post 99, Wake1 wrote:AGar ———✶ Would you please explain yourself?
Oooh boy. Oooooooh boy. What the fuck is this? Seriously.In post 139, Almost50 wrote:@Titus:
LOL. When was the last time you saw me following "logic" as you would expect it to be?? You've played with me more than anyone else in this game, so you should know better.
Need I remind you of me fake-claiming, then outright hard-claiming AND speculating about the setup (correctly) early on D1?? Where was "logic" in my play in that game?? Yet, if only the town listened to me early enough we might've won it still!!
This is hilariously wrong.In post 148, Titus wrote:@Wake, Because you're incapable of drawing basic conclusions from the functions of votes doesn't mean that the rest of us can't. The only exception(s) to a vote = a scumread are 1) RVS (which we're out of) or 2) a policy lynch [which is akin to saying I don't know that person is scum but they are infinitely pro scum. Using a vote for reactions still means the person wants that player, at any given time, dead more than any other player.
Rather than being semantic and checkboxing, do you have anything productive to do?
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuucking die you scumbag. Hoooooly shit.In post 387, Performer wrote:Ok. This is going to sound crazy but I want to point out 2 people in here who I want to limit any serious interaction with on d1 at least, because I'm afraid for their safety. I don't want to paint targets on their backs , as I have a huge bias toward specific people and may accidentally draw too much attention to them.
Person X: I played with you when I was Town Mailman and you were in a hydra. We were both town.
We were also VTs in the 14-man large normal, which had 1-shot Bp Doc and Bp Bg.
Time and time again, you can read me well.
Person Y: We played in the Mini Normal where you survived as PR the entire game - impressive. You read me well and defended me throughout the game, which made a further impression on me. I was constantly in this back-and-forth with another Townie. We were both town. In this game , there was a 2-man scum team with 1 Mafia Traitor. I think this game was back in Nov 2015.
You guys know who you are. Anyway, back to rest of the game!
Then you shouldn't have made it unprompted?In post 414, Lapsa wrote:@podoboq would prefer not discussing my claim much further. ty
Wait wait wait.... Are you really saying because you did something one time in a game when you were scum, that this means he's scum?
"There's no AtE" "I'm going to AtE now."In post 537, Titus wrote:Yeah now you're trying to paint yourself as town no one likes.
Call me when you're ready to lynch this or take me out.
A town that let's this live will believe any lie and deserves to lose.
VLA 3days
It's ok, we've all been terribly, terribly wrong before.In post 545, Dunnstral wrote:Just to reiterate I have Titus firmly as town
hey, you started itIn post 541, Titus wrote:@Lapsa, what forces me to think Zach claimed scum? He did... like what type of word salad is this?
maybe. you tell meIn post 561, AGar wrote:Then you shouldn't have made it unprompted?
?????In post 564, Transcend wrote:especially after you've given crappy non-credible reads all game.
In post 153, Dunnstral wrote:Ok Sickofit1138 and Zachstralkita both mafia
In post 176, Dunnstral wrote:Zachstral shannon maf team
In post 180, Dunnstral wrote:ok Zach mafia with either Shannon or Transcend
In post 337, Dunnstral wrote:Shannon and pobo both ignored me earlyIn post 333, Almost50 wrote:Not gonna address the first 2 bc I've already said what I want to say in that post.In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like 325 because:
I never suspected Wake
I never suspected Nosferatu
My vote on podoboq was clearly an rvs wagon vote
My stuff on shannon is only if Zach is mafia
You can say I implied whatever but it's not true
Regarding podoq, you voted him then shannon then him again. It was the only time you voted shannon too, although you did state suspicion of her later on. So, are you telling me that your podoq-shannon-podoq were RVS? how about your Trabscend-Transcend double vote? Were these RVS or serious??
In fact, since you were kind enough to provide a full read list I would very much appreciate a line or two explaining each read. Why are Titus/Lapsa townier than Boem, Implosion & Wake? What links do you see between the "bottom six" (using term with a grain of salt) that makes you think some of them are scum with eachother?
Transcend serious vote
Titus/Lapsa are town because I said so
In post 482, Dunnstral wrote:Titus is town guys
In post 487, Dunnstral wrote:podoboq looks worse than before
mirhawk might be mafia but that's just a feeling