Page 23 of 130
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:20 am
by Transcend
I've explained it thoroughly over the course of this game. If you were actually reading the game you'd know it. I'm not busting my butt to explain it again when you can look at my iso.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 2:44 pm
by Thor665
I find you both beautiful - one of you should put Karnos on L-1.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 3:05 pm
by mhsmith0
Ego post, pending mod confirmation of sub and actual receipt of role pm (he offered me the slot).
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:13 pm
by tojam2
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:17 pm
by tojam2
In post 549, Rosske wrote:You don't want to explain it because its a
shitty
empty scum read. And the more you talk about it the more likely you'll reveal that its contrived.
Seriously guys, does it require all that swearing?
VC Day 1 - 7
Karnos L-2 - Luna Fox, Io, Thor665, gigabyte
PhantomCobalt L-5 - Tenshii
Io L-3 - karnos, Killthestory, Rosske
Killthestory L-5 - mhsmith0
Transcend L-5 - PhantomCobalt
Luna Fox L-5 - Transcend
(expired on 2016-07-29 16:30:00)
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:19 pm
by gigabyteTroubadour
since phantom answered it late, don't waste your time with the rqs, smith. it's not super important any more (there are wagons to discuss!!), but that's not to say i made it to waste people's time or that i didn't find it helpful, because i actually did.
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:58 pm
by Transcend
both of my scumreads are parked on the two highest lynches
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 12:22 am
by gigabyteTroubadour
find it helpful. i did find it helpful.
i just reread that post and it sounds like i was admitting to wasting everyone's time ,':K
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:16 am
by mhsmith0
@all: current thoughts on Luna? For the #1 volume poster she sure seems to be saying not very much interesting/helpful.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:43 am
by gigabyteTroubadour
In post 558, mhsmith0 wrote:@all: current thoughts on Luna? For the #1 volume poster she sure seems to be saying not very much interesting/helpful.
Kind of a null read (just below KTS and Phantom for me), her PoE playstyle is fakeable as scum but believable and consistent with her meta. I think she's better as a person of interest after a flip unless there's something I'm missing here.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:44 am
by Transcend
In post 558, mhsmith0 wrote:@all: current thoughts on Luna? For the #1 volume poster she sure seems to be saying not very much interesting/helpful.
Scum.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:46 am
by mhsmith0
In post 559, gigabyteTroubadour wrote: In post 558, mhsmith0 wrote:@all: current thoughts on Luna? For the #1 volume poster she sure seems to be saying not very much interesting/helpful.
Kind of a null read (just below KTS and Phantom for me), her PoE playstyle is fakeable as scum but believable and consistent with her meta. I think she's better as a person of interest after a flip unless there's something I'm missing here.
so do you mean that simply the approach of using PoE is consistent, or is there a deeper consistency you're seeing?
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:50 am
by gigabyteTroubadour
In post 561, mhsmith0 wrote:so do you mean that simply the approach of using PoE is consistent, or is there a deeper consistency you're seeing?
I haven't done a true meta read of her but she's at, the very least,
used
it before, so no there's nothing really deep there.
It's just that if I scumread her with my perspective of the gamestate, I feel like I'm scumreading the playstyle and not the motivations. I want to see how she adapts when she's wrong because I think regardless of alignment she's not going to nail both scum because that will help me understand her better.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:54 am
by gigabyteTroubadour
i'm currently comparing isos between this game and a game that i just learned was completed that luna was in and i will get back to you with thoughts
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:06 am
by gigabyteTroubadour
I was thinking of Summer Waltz since I /inned for it but /outted because I decided to replace into this game.
I really don't know what to make of this actually, which is exactly why Luna is sticking in null for me. I like her activity more in the linked game but I'm worried it's just confbias? I might need a few days to mull this over actually, I might be able to make sense of it after my plate is a bit clearer.
My opinion hasn't really changed, I don't think I have the information I want to gauge Luna's motivations.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:13 am
by mhsmith0
FYI this is Luna's scum game
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
if you want to compare/contrast. Imo she's closer to her wolfing than her town game at
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
(I hadn't read waltz)
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:24 am
by Luna Fox
Probably because this game has been a wallfest of arguing the same thing and i can't seem to stop it.
Not really saying that makes me town, but im not happy that i have a hard time getting reads this game.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:26 am
by Luna Fox
So mhsmith is kcdas.
I had a townread on that slot and he hasn't dissapointed. I think his assesment is valid considering that's how i feel about this game right now, even tho the conclusion leads to the wrong result.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:27 am
by mhsmith0
Why did your read of Thor v karnos go from tvt to voting karnos?
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:28 am
by Luna Fox
One of Karnos posts felt like reaching
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:29 am
by Luna Fox
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:31 am
by Transcend
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
I'm not reading games that I wasn't a part of to gain meta on someone.
So stop posting past games.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:31 am
by Luna Fox
And if you're wondering why i didnt vote him at the time, at the time i still had PC as possible scum, then giga linked a game and i read his ISO and checked his activity via timestamps in that game so i felt i could be wrong here, and then switched my vote to my suspect with the highest wagon.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:34 am
by mhsmith0
In post 571, Transcend wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again.
I'm not reading games that I wasn't a part of to gain meta on someone.
So stop posting past games.
Close investigating suggests that there are many players in this game other than you, some of whom may actually bother. And given that you'd already stated a read on Luna, you weren't really who I was talking to.
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:36 am
by Transcend
Just an FYI.