Page 23 of 27

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:28 am
by TheSweatpantsNinja
What cyberbob said is what I meant. I think porochaz was scum, but we don't really have the evidence to be sure. Whatever our lynch is today will provide us with more information.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:48 am
by farside22
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:What cyberbob said is what I meant. I think porochaz was scum, but we don't really have the evidence to be sure. Whatever our lynch is today will provide us with more information.
Well you can't say for sure if he is so calling my comment scummie is rediculous. Someone made a comment that maybe only the scum alignment is revealed upon lynch which is also possible.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:07 am
by TheSweatpantsNinja
I said that. . . but its not what you said, its how you said it. Plus the hammer on scot. Its more the hammer on scot, really.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:27 am
by farside22
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I said that. . . but its not what you said, its how you said it. Plus the hammer on scot. Its more the hammer on scot, really.
I said I thought Quag was hinting about his role and I found scot's counter claim scummie. Or are you upset that I hammered he, turned out he was scum and he was your partner. :roll:

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:36 am
by farside22
@TSN: How can you go from saying that maybe scum will be revealed during a lynch to saying Porochaz is scum? Can you make up your mind?

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:55 pm
by Flameaxe
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:What cyberbob said is what I meant. I think porochaz was scum, but we don't really have the evidence to be sure. Whatever our lynch is today will provide us with more information.
With only one confirmed scum alive, I hardly think we should be looking at the information we get from the lynch itself.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:55 pm
by Flameaxe
One confirmed dead*

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:15 pm
by Brutal Assassin
So.

TSPN or Cyberbob?

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:12 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
farside22 wrote: @TSN: How can you go from saying that maybe scum will be revealed during a lynch to saying Porochaz is scum? Can you make up your mind?
I'm saying its one or the other. I don't know which it is. Do you?

At BA: I'd say neither.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:22 pm
by farside22
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:
farside22 wrote: @TSN: How can you go from saying that maybe scum will be revealed during a lynch to saying Porochaz is scum? Can you make up your mind?
I'm saying its one or the other. I don't know which it is. Do you?

At BA: I'd say neither.
I said I didn't know and you FOS me for saying I didn't know. You make it sound like you know he was scum more then saying you don't know and are assuming he is more likely then not. Your main point is my hammering which is a null tell.

FOS: TSPN

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:30 pm
by Cyberbob
farside22 wrote:Your main point is my hammering which is a null tell.
Explain. A hammer is rarely a null tell, so what is it about your one which makes it so?

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:12 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
Again, farside, its not what you said, its how you said it. And I don't find the hammer on scot a null tell at all.

Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:25 am
by farside22
He was scum. Scum can hammer and a town can hammer a scum. If you are complianing I did it too soon for your taste my question is were you hoping he would be able to convince people to vote against Quag instead of him? Did either of you see Quag's hint about his role?

Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:59 am
by TheSweatpantsNinja
No, but it sure would have been nice to hear that confirmed innocent. Would have been nice to have scot give some more "results." There's really no reason to rush in that situation unless you want to cut off discussion.

Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:52 am
by Flameaxe
Catching up later...

Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 12:13 pm
by Brutal Assassin
Posting, waiting for BBM to catch up.

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:59 am
by farside22
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:No, but it sure would have been nice to hear that confirmed innocent. Would have been nice to have scot give some more "results." There's really no reason to rush in that situation unless you want to cut off discussion.
I said I thought Quag said he had a confirmed on cycerbob. Did you believe scot when he counter claimed?

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:33 am
by Flameaxe
Didn't get to catch up last night, will attempt to tonight.

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:31 pm
by Brutal Assassin
Waiting.... <3

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:15 pm
by TheSweatpantsNinja
farside22 wrote: I said I thought Quag said he had a confirmed on cycerbob. Did you believe scot when he counter claimed?
I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:32 pm
by Cyberbob
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.
QFT. The way I see it there are 3 possibilities:

a) Farside was lying scum bussing her partner
b) Farside was lazy scum bussing her partner
c) Farside was lazy town lynching scum

I'm unsure at this time which of these to go with; I don't think we have really discussed this issue in sufficient detail.

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:01 am
by farside22
Cyberbob wrote:
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.
QFT. The way I see it there are 3 possibilities:

a) Farside was lying scum bussing her partner
b) Farside was lazy scum bussing her partner
c) Farside was lazy town lynching scum

I'm unsure at this time which of these to go with; I don't think we have really discussed this issue in sufficient detail.
Scum following scum? I keep seeing this in the past few post with TSPN saying something then Bob coming up and agreeing quickly.

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:02 am
by Flameaxe
farside22 wrote:
Cyberbob wrote:
TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.
QFT. The way I see it there are 3 possibilities:

a) Farside was lying scum bussing her partner
b) Farside was lazy scum bussing her partner
c) Farside was lazy town lynching scum

I'm unsure at this time which of these to go with; I don't think we have really discussed this issue in sufficient detail.
Scum following scum? I keep seeing this in the past few post with TSPN saying something then Bob coming up and agreeing quickly.
I know, right?

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:22 am
by Cyberbob
Flameaxe wins.

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:31 am
by Flameaxe
Cyberbob wrote:Flameaxe wins.
I know, right?