Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:28 am
What cyberbob said is what I meant. I think porochaz was scum, but we don't really have the evidence to be sure. Whatever our lynch is today will provide us with more information.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Well you can't say for sure if he is so calling my comment scummie is rediculous. Someone made a comment that maybe only the scum alignment is revealed upon lynch which is also possible.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:What cyberbob said is what I meant. I think porochaz was scum, but we don't really have the evidence to be sure. Whatever our lynch is today will provide us with more information.
I said I thought Quag was hinting about his role and I found scot's counter claim scummie. Or are you upset that I hammered he, turned out he was scum and he was your partner.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I said that. . . but its not what you said, its how you said it. Plus the hammer on scot. Its more the hammer on scot, really.
With only one confirmed scum alive, I hardly think we should be looking at the information we get from the lynch itself.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:What cyberbob said is what I meant. I think porochaz was scum, but we don't really have the evidence to be sure. Whatever our lynch is today will provide us with more information.
I'm saying its one or the other. I don't know which it is. Do you?farside22 wrote: @TSN: How can you go from saying that maybe scum will be revealed during a lynch to saying Porochaz is scum? Can you make up your mind?
I said I didn't know and you FOS me for saying I didn't know. You make it sound like you know he was scum more then saying you don't know and are assuming he is more likely then not. Your main point is my hammering which is a null tell.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I'm saying its one or the other. I don't know which it is. Do you?farside22 wrote: @TSN: How can you go from saying that maybe scum will be revealed during a lynch to saying Porochaz is scum? Can you make up your mind?
At BA: I'd say neither.
Explain. A hammer is rarely a null tell, so what is it about your one which makes it so?farside22 wrote:Your main point is my hammering which is a null tell.
I said I thought Quag said he had a confirmed on cycerbob. Did you believe scot when he counter claimed?TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:No, but it sure would have been nice to hear that confirmed innocent. Would have been nice to have scot give some more "results." There's really no reason to rush in that situation unless you want to cut off discussion.
I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.farside22 wrote: I said I thought Quag said he had a confirmed on cycerbob. Did you believe scot when he counter claimed?
QFT. The way I see it there are 3 possibilities:TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.
Scum following scum? I keep seeing this in the past few post with TSPN saying something then Bob coming up and agreeing quickly.Cyberbob wrote:QFT. The way I see it there are 3 possibilities:TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.
a) Farside was lying scum bussing her partner
b) Farside was lazy scum bussing her partner
c) Farside was lazy town lynching scum
I'm unsure at this time which of these to go with; I don't think we have really discussed this issue in sufficient detail.
I know, right?farside22 wrote:Scum following scum? I keep seeing this in the past few post with TSPN saying something then Bob coming up and agreeing quickly.Cyberbob wrote:QFT. The way I see it there are 3 possibilities:TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:I would have found quag's claim more believable, but, y'know, I didn't get a chance to, because someone hammered three hours after scot's counterclaim.
a) Farside was lying scum bussing her partner
b) Farside was lazy scum bussing her partner
c) Farside was lazy town lynching scum
I'm unsure at this time which of these to go with; I don't think we have really discussed this issue in sufficient detail.
I know, right?Cyberbob wrote:Flameaxe wins.