Sorry that I've been absent, I'll try to get caught up here tomorrow
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 8:00 pm
by Not_Mafia
You're getting lynched, sorry to break it to you
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 1:24 am
by Vorkuta
Yeah pikachu- schadd's high-effort post made it pretty damn impossible for you to survive D1 without something juicy so do your best!
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 1:29 am
by Vorkuta
In post 471, Psyche wrote:to at this point be using your vote a bit more forcefully than to add to a wagon...
Crap ok I get psyche's point
He's disapproving of us using our votes to wagon lurkers instead of solving as it smells like "well I can't do shit, D1 is horrible, so here's a lurker wagon to see what's up".
Hmm do I buy this? I don't buy this.
Wagons -> fluidity of wagon -> resistance of wagon -> associations -> ??? -> solves
Lel I read your shit and gave you a few questions that you conveniently ignored (#376)
Tbh there's no point in arguing with you as I have you pinned for town but backing down isn't my strong suit so *shrugs*
In post 526, Redemption wrote:1. 3 RVS lynch in a row on Schadd was very suspicious early on in the game
Welcome to this site- this is meta/standard-operating-procedure/tuesday.
Like if you don't buy this, I can link games where ANYONE has been put to L-3/L-2 simply in the first stage of RVS and this was IN NO WAY ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE.
FTFY
Yeah no, this part and your Gamma read I'm fine with. The timing (5th person on the wagon ) is maybe suspicious, but I'll allow it.
However the moonlogic in your first 2 steps doesn't stand
You mean his quality gif posting in #340 #343 #344 and #345?
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 1:48 am
by Vorkuta
@REDEMPTION
Ok- the first time you called PP defensive was in response to
In post 340, PenguinPower wrote:So...scum hunting in RVS is scummy unless your MJL mentioning an RVS wagon on schadd because the RVS wagon on schadd was a ruse.
and his barrage of gifs to support this.
This PP sentence is completely valid, and points out several contradictions/cases of double standards being applied.
It's not defensiveness- as in my experience this would be accompanied by an increase of "emotions"/"anger"/"backlash"
Thus your reasoning for a scum!PP isn't one I can get behind (as much as I would want to )
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 1:58 am
by Vorkuta
Reads after pika responds and performer & CDB make a few more posts I suppose
This game roster is hilarious with a perfect mix of old-timers, newbies, trolls, and animals. I love it (pref with fewer lurkers )
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 2:09 am
by GuyInFreezer
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 2:24 am
by MaryJoLisa
In post 554, Vorkuta wrote:
#74O are actually suspicious as MJL has several games under her belt and I'm 90% sure
too lazy to read
there has been similar RVS funny stuff in at least one. Her level of
ovaries
suspicion/git-pings does not match her experience and analysis, but I'll table
US, not UK
that for now
Asking a question to understand the setup is scummy? I have two closed setups under my belt. One I left early D1 as town mason and you can see the confusion spelled out very plainly. I was confused about everything.
The other was a Hydra and I stuck with it in the scum and Hydra PTs asking tons of stupid newbie questions all game long.
And GuyInFreezer had to answer a few stupid newbie questions as well. Sure glad he's not playing the game if asking questions gets ya a scum read.
Please, seriously, break down for me *exactly* what is scummy about me asking a question?
"Really?" in 259 feels like something someone wouldnt include in the post as scum
i had the same assessment as 544 that he seems like he would try to exert more control as scum. possible exception if his team is doing well right now, but then in that case dp is probably a mislynch and why would he vote there (it was a vanity wagon at the time but i think i and maybe other people were scumreading him by then)
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 11:43 am
by Redemption
Alright here it goes, I may be brieve on my explanation but I'll try to emphasize more on each of them on demand once I'm over my last exam this monday morning :
Most likely scum
: Penguin Power, Gamma Emerald
Penguin Power: Defensiveness (yeah I won't budge from that one) from post 340 to 375 and my most clarified post on it: #526 and probable defense of Gamma Emerald and maybe busing him (#299)
Gamma Emerald (my current lynch) : Long absence aside, his answer to MaryJoLisa still bothers me, it's my only lead so far
Probably scum
: Detective Pikachu, Lucky Otter
Detective Pikachu: Just returned from over a day of absence without mentioning or justifying it.
Lucky Otter: Only person voting me as of now. Just because he didn't like my answers at some point in the game, wasn't even bothered emphasizing on his motives since.
Neutral
: Schadd, Not_Mafia, Vorkuta, Performer, Lil Uzi Vert
Schadd : Posted a sufficient amount of content but still is neutral to me so far
Not_Mafia and Vorkuta: both look like two confused-changing-their-votes-at-any-point-of-the-game-for-unknown-reason twins, but one runs more his mouth than the other and use criticism to compensate for failing to make up his own mind.
Performer: Posted a sufficient amount of content as well, neutral as well
Lil Uzi Vert: Would like to hear more of him and know why he lynched MaryJoLisa
Probably town
: MaryJoLisa
MaryJoLisa : Her early d1 intervention on the 3 RVS lynches screamed town to me. But I still want to know why she doesn't get "town vibes" from me.
Most likely town
(that's 40BF00 btw) : Psyche, Channel Delibird
Psyche : Points out all I was saying about PenguinPower minus my "moonlogic" XD
ChannelDelibird : calls out Detective Pikachu about saying that the game doesn't advance much while doing jack shit to make it. That is a valid point because that might have been a "look good attempt" from him to put himself out of vote range (how is that working out for you buddy? ;;;)
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 11:46 am
by Psyche
ooh colors
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 11:53 am
by Redemption
Wait, I just saw's Pikachu's last post. I'll change my opinion for what ChannelDelibird pointed out.
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 11:56 am
by Redemption
Clarification: I changed my opinion about Detective Pikachu and change it for the point that ChannelDelibird made. Still "probably scum" to my eyes.
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 12:36 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 561, Redemption wrote:PenguinPower, why do you think that Lil Uzi Vert is town? (post #398)
I have a N0 cop inno on him.
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 12:36 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 553, Vorkuta wrote:Wagons -> fluidity of wagon -> resistance of wagon -> associations -> ??? -> solves