Mafiascum.net

In post 547, Menalque wrote:

In post 537, skitter30 wrote:@menalque: an example would be his whole exchange with u regarding the cop/doc/neighborizer thing - he thinks he found an inconsistency in your approach to the game and is using his quetions to try to understand your thought process

yeah, I agree that was townie, the problem I have with it is that it only emerged at all after someone was actually pushing and I think that doing something like that is defo within the capabilities of scum!luv

a) how well do u know luv that you can make that judgement
b) idk if it really matters that it only emerged after someone was pushing him

@dann re:539 why don’t you like it?

Because you’re townreading me or for another reason?

menalque did u know that you can link posts?

you do it by writing:

[post]post number [ \post]

without the space between the '[' and the '\'

actually the slash is in the other direction, sorry

Except no one was pushing me before I expressed intent? Dan was the closest thing.

I thought you probably could but I hadn’t bothered figuring it out

Thanks

In post 548, skitter30 wrote: -snip-

@dann what do u think of these?

I mean pisskop saying "the doc" is fine, if he's actually a doctor, it's both semantically and technically correct from his pov

Menalque saying that... I'm guessing you think it's TMI, but unless scum has an informed role they wouldn't exactly be more knowledgeable than town on whether a doc exists. I think you might be reading too much into it but *shrug*

What do you think about the claim coming prematurely? Before intent, that is

tin-foil hat theory is that scum were informed that there was a doctor and he's expecting someone to cc

idk what bnl's mod-meta is though (like i know schadd loves informed roles), no idea if he puts in informed roles or not

kinda looked around for a bit for another bnl-designed mini normal but didn't find one

i think the claim is kinda suspect

In post 555, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Except no one was pushing me before I expressed intent? Dan was the closest thing.

I meant I think the towniest thing you’ve done was when you were questioning me about if I’d still scumreads you

And that was after I started pushing you

In post 558, skitter30 wrote:tin-foil hat theory is that scum were informed that there was a doctor and he's expecting someone to cc

Can you not think of any other theories?

?

Re:550 I obvs don’t know him that well but I saw a bit of him when I was reading some of your meta and he seems like a competent enough player that doing something townie after people starting to scum him is defo something he could do

You don’t think it matters that he basically wasn’t doing anything before?

VOTE: Menalque
I'm scumreading Menalque here. Compared to my previous experience with him, his thought process is much less cohesive and I find myself a bit confused by his play. I find 560 to be an example of that.

As a hot take, I think there's exactly one scum in {Menalque, skitter}

Where is my thought process less cohesive?

In post 564, Menalque wrote:Where is my thought process less cohesive?

In our last game, I could see myself thinking most of the things that you said and I understood where that thought process came from. Here, that's much less of the case. For instance, I'm not sure where your post in 560 came from.

In post 547, Menalque wrote:

In post 537, skitter30 wrote:@menalque: an example would be his whole exchange with u regarding the cop/doc/neighborizer thing - he thinks he found an inconsistency in your approach to the game and is using his quetions to try to understand your thought process

yeah, I agree that was townie, the problem I have with it is that it only emerged at all after someone was actually pushing and I think that doing something like that is defo within the capabilities of scum!luv

Here again, I don't see it. The person pushing LUV here was you I believe? Wouldn't that make it equally as townie or more townie for him to be trying to figure you out?

In post 565, ClearlyClarity wrote:

Robbnva has requested replacement. Deadline is paused until I find a suitable replacement.

This slot is very likely town imo

In post 568, Dannflor wrote:

In post 565, ClearlyClarity wrote:

Robbnva has requested replacement. Deadline is paused until I find a suitable replacement.

This slot is very likely town imo

I agree

quick first ever readslist -
town
robb
dann
luv
exilon
skitter
pisskop
menalque
scum

In post 567, Cinnamon wrote:

In post 547, Menalque wrote:

In post 537, skitter30 wrote:@menalque: an example would be his whole exchange with u regarding the cop/doc/neighborizer thing - he thinks he found an inconsistency in your approach to the game and is using his quetions to try to understand your thought process

yeah, I agree that was townie, the problem I have with it is that it only emerged at all after someone was actually pushing and I think that doing something like that is defo within the capabilities of scum!luv

Here again, I don't see it. The person pushing LUV here was you I believe? Wouldn't that make it equally as townie or more townie for him to be trying to figure you out?

Yeah, it was. Here’s my logic: luv does very little all game, avoids getting on wagons, doesn’t really offer anything in the way of analysis, complains about the gamestate then doesn’t really try to do anything to improve it himself

Then he jumps on pk v quickly, before rounding off there to jump on me after I call him out

It’s only after this that a couple of votes head his way, and only after that that he starts doing anything meaningfully townie (trying to figure out my thought process around pk and the doc claim)

I don’t see how him only towning it up at all after pressure is town indicative when everything before is scum indicative

Yeah, 560 is weird, I’m not denying that or explain it rn. But do me a favour, consider two things. (1) why does scum!me make that opaot when I’m obviously aware enough to know that it looks strange at best and (2) if you assume town!me hat does it mean — not expecting you to post the answer to (2) here but think about it

Explaining*
Make that post*

Also why are you reading robb as townier than dann?