Page 23 of 115
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:19 pm
by emps
In post 150, Wimpy wrote:Datisi, I am deeply sorry if it seemed like I was calling you a cheater, that was not my intention. I don't even consider somebody who breaks a rule is a cheater, people break rules all the time. cheating is something next level.
my interpretation of the rules are obviously different. To me using information from other games is like "As town Mike Hunt always argues" or "as scum, joe mamma usually lurks"
coming in voting somebody because they were scum in another game, is interpreted as a grudge, especially if that person beat you.
So my sincere apologies for implying you cheated or broke any sort of rule.
that said, I still find it incredibly scummy even if to others it is an illogical reason to do so.
sick names lmao
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:21 pm
by emps
my question is, whose reasoning for a pg 2 serious vote isnt flimsy lmao (directed towards posts at end of pg 6 and sone of pg 7)
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:22 pm
by emps
In post 150, Wimpy wrote:
coming in voting somebody because they were scum in another game, is interpreted as a grudge, especially if that person beat you.
this doesnt really apply because they were scumbuddies lol
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:24 pm
by emps
In post 156, Datisi wrote:I specifically bolded the "scummy" part there, but I honestly appreciate and accept the apology. While you didn't call me a cheater, saying I broke site rules when I clearly didn't did anger me.
And rest assured, there is ABSOLUTELY NO grudge between me and Menalque - regarding the game in question (Micro 892), we were scum together, and it's one of my most favorite games I've played on this site.
And I still find your reasoning very illogical.
pedit: holy shit here you two go again
okay back into the pissing match we go i guess *unzips pants*
ppedit: uhhh
pppedit: LET ME POST
oh the unzips pants part was because of the pissing match lmao
i concerned when i heard that no context at like pg 11 or smth
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:27 pm
by emps
In post 166, Wimpy wrote: In post 162, Menalque wrote:I mean yes there obviously was
You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy
I pointed out how you quite clearly were claiming you thought datisi was scum in your earlier posts
In post 147, Wimpy wrote:Have you played mafia before?
Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum. I never declared I thought he is definitely scum.
"have you played mafia before"the man with 0 completed games says to the person whos a JOAT
ffs i post a shit ton and we have somewhat similar join dates and he has a higher total postcount than me lmao
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:33 pm
by emps
In post 169, Menalque wrote: In post 165, Wimpy wrote: In post 156, Datisi wrote:okay back into the pissing match we go i guess *unzips pants*
I am done responding to menalque, and probably you for a while. You both want to nitpick every little thing and while i can't talk about it, I am definitely annoyed at this site right now cause people want to nitpick instead of actually letting the game play out.
so you guys keep doing you. I have nothing more to say to either you about the first 6 pages. If I get lynched, I guess i will learn to somehow use logic that applies to everyone (despite actually knowing what other people consider logical and illogical) and ignore what I personally think is logical.
Good day chaps. Off to enjoy a tasty breakfast burger
This is a lot of words to say “I realise I fucked up and outed myself so now I’m gonna ignore it and hope it goes away”
what? this reads more like him trying to learn from this game and also trying to take a step back because you guys pretty much repeated the same things over and over and over and after a while it just became "well you said this, and then that" "wait what i said neither of those" "uhhh... but you did?"
and its just become like arguing about whos said what and whether or not you did smth or not
and honestly, its not that fun to read and reply to, and its hard to follow along.
it just becomes 10 pages of bullshit that people half read and it messes with their reads and honestly confuses the fuck out of me like every other post
like srsly i have maybe like half a read rn
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:34 pm
by emps
In post 170, Menalque wrote: In post 168, Wimpy wrote: In post 71, Wimpy wrote: In post 66, Datisi wrote:
Ok then please give results of your sorting
And explain why referencing past games w/ a friend makes me scummy
I think you are probably scum.
I know I’m town
Menal is null
I fee when scum try to rvs it comes off awkward and yours came off awkward. I’m also not a fan of using people’s alignment in another game, in future games because I consider that outside influences. Even if it’s a joke
note the bolded.
also
In post 162, Menalque wrote:You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy
This is a lie.
You claimed that in
147: “ Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum”
is pressuring people because they did something that is in their eyes, scummy, bad?
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:35 pm
by emps
god im stupid i missed a comma
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:35 pm
by emps
In post 556, emps wrote: In post 170, Menalque wrote: In post 168, Wimpy wrote: In post 71, Wimpy wrote: In post 66, Datisi wrote:
Ok then please give results of your sorting
And explain why referencing past games w/ a friend makes me scummy
I think you are probably scum.
I know I’m town
Menal is null
I fee when scum try to rvs it comes off awkward and yours came off awkward. I’m also not a fan of using people’s alignment in another game, in future games because I consider that outside influences. Even if it’s a joke
note the bolded.
also
In post 162, Menalque wrote:You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy
This is a lie.
You claimed that in
147: “ Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum”
is pressuring people because they did something that is, in their eyes, scummy bad?
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:37 pm
by emps
oh boy i really hope its ToS or like chat mafia because if its forum mafia
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:38 pm
by emps
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:41 pm
by emps
In post 188, Wimpy wrote:
I haven't played poorly though.
"Your value doesn't decrease based on someone's inability to see your worth"
Just cause you think i have, doesn't mean I actually have.
Expecting me to have 100% certainty in my scum reads early game before others have posted, and then using the fact that i don't against me and implying that 1. i am scum and 2. I am a shitty player is both factually incorrect and personally offensive.
Please don't critique my play anymore or I will consider that a personal insult.
critiquing play isnt usually a personal insult
but like most constructive criticism comes post game tho
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:43 pm
by Alduskkel
Hi guys I'm in this game what's going on
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:46 pm
by emps
blah blah blah im going to assume and hope that i replied to everything worth replying to on pg 9 and 10 because i was on then and i really dont want to do more of this shit
pedit : oh hi everythings been a shitshow so far
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:47 pm
by emps
its like an irl day in and already 23 pages. im on pg 11 or so rn
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:51 pm
by emps
oh wow apparently past me was responsible and did pg 11 as well oh boy pg 12 here we go
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:51 pm
by Alduskkel
I'm on page 7. I hope this isn't just 90% Menalque, Datisi, and Wimpy. Reading Wimpy as scum for being super defensive while also being like "I don't care if you think I'm scum."
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:52 pm
by emps
In post 277, Wimpy wrote: In post 274, Wickedestjr wrote:Yes, it does matter. I would appreciate if you could answer this question. At the very least, it would be nice to know the nature of the 200+ games that you’ve played. For instance, there’s a major difference between playing 200+ games on a real-time site like epicmafia vs playing forum games like here.
I disagree
just... tell us where you played?
pedit : oh uh... check the activity overview and that should give u ur answer lmao
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:55 pm
by emps
In post 294, Menalque wrote:Hey, do y’all realise that if we power lynch wimpy here then we may break a record by lynching scum before >20% of the PL had posted?
damn how are you going to lynch someone when only 20% or less of the playerlist hasnt checked in yet lol
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:55 pm
by Alduskkel
oh god oh fuck why
I shouldn't have to say this but filling up 20+ pages with posts from just 3 players isn't pro-town. I have a feeling I'm about to read a lot of arguments going around in circles.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:56 pm
by emps
In post 568, emps wrote: In post 294, Menalque wrote:Hey, do y’all realise that if we power lynch wimpy here then we may break a record by lynching scum before >20% of the PL had posted?
damn how are you going to lynch someone when only 20% or less of the playerlist hasnt checked in yet lol
wait fuck i was trying to make fun of him for doing >20% instead of <20% but english is hard and i fucked up
pedit : ur completely correct lmao
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:57 pm
by Alduskkel
In post 152, Wimpy wrote:I am not really concerned how people interpret my actions.
(Has posted 183 times in a 572 post topic.)
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:00 pm
by Wimpy
In post 566, Alduskkel wrote:I'm on page 7. I hope this isn't just 90% Menalque, Datisi, and Wimpy. Reading Wimpy as scum for being super defensive while also being like "I don't care if you think I'm scum."
That’s nai though. At least for me. I don’t care if you scum read me but you do need to have a good reason.
Not a single person has provided anything good.
Menal’s reason is cause I was faking being non chalant, and the rest is essentially chain saw defending another player with the entire basis of his argument being a lie.
Datisi - honestly don’t know why he scum reads me. He just seems to have piled on. I get menal not wanting to recognize the lie but the fact she isn’t either is bizarre.
The entire 23 pages is arguing over my early reasons for placing a serious vote. I also love to argue and defend myself. I think every player should defend themselves when falsely accused.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:06 pm
by Luca Blight
I've read as much as I can of the thread, but it has become increasingly painful to read and I've skimmed a fair bit of it. I'm scumreading Wimpy based on his method of defence, but I'm not fine with ending the day yet as if he does flip town then we gain nothing from it.
I do think Menalque and Datisi are town, particularly the latter. Apart from that I haven't yet got a read on anyone else.
Can someone do me a favour and just summarize in one post the main points against Wimpy?
@Wimpy
, I'm still going to be open to the idea of you being town, but the more you defend yourself the worse you look. I take it you think the scumteam is literally Datisi + Menalque? If you could summarize your points in one neat and tidy post then that would be grand as well.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:09 pm
by emps
In post 573, Luca Blight wrote:I've read as much as I can of the thread, but it has become increasingly painful to read
same tbh reading whatever the fuck is going on is painful