Mafiascum.net

In post 548, Uncrowned wrote:I'm beginning to think that one of JV/Hoopla is scum.

Why would that be

In post 549, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 545, Infinity 324 wrote:Jackson why are you focusing on NAI stuff so much, this is literally just about theory.

I don't see it as nai but if you want to explain why that'd be neat

Like, s_s made a post about his opinion on mafia in general (i.e., that good reads are hard to get as town or fake as scum). Do you think he could be lying?

Dave's ISO is interesting.

While limited, we see that he targets TGP's arrival in the thread, and seems capable of formulating a well thought out and written response to some of TGP's posting.

However, there has been plenty of content in this game that I feel is just as readable as TGO's entrance into this thread, but he has commented on almost none of it.

Is there a reason you've singled out TGP here while ignoring most of the others slots in the game? Assuming some of the other players theories on town!TGP is correct and he's just making incorrect reads (that are still believable from his perspective) then it would appear as though you're targeting him because of his "suboptimal" (idk how to say this without sounding like a complete dick) posting, while a lot of the other slots in this game (Skitter, S_S, Myself, Infinity, Peta, Penguin) have demonstrated stronger posting, which you've not discussed at all.

In post 547, Hoopla wrote:oh my, i've fallen behind already.

is it too early for me to start scolding the chatterboxes? do i need to prepare my "balance of voices" speech?

hang on.

i just made a stunning realisation that these are seven day deadlines. serves me right for skimming the OP!

i take back my post 547. spam away brave townsfolk.

~~

i also just realised jackson virgo is in the group of 4's. this is shocking play on my part. there's no way i'm executing from that bracket on D1.

i apologise to jackson virgo for my overeagerness.

UNVOTE:

In post 551, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 549, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 545, Infinity 324 wrote:Jackson why are you focusing on NAI stuff so much, this is literally just about theory.

I don't see it as nai but if you want to explain why that'd be neat

Like, s_s made a post about his opinion on mafia in general (i.e., that good reads are hard to get as town or fake as scum). Do you think he could be lying?

No no that's not what I was saying, I was just saying that their wording was wrong

In post 553, Hoopla wrote:

In post 547, Hoopla wrote:oh my, i've fallen behind already.

is it too early for me to start scolding the chatterboxes? do i need to prepare my "balance of voices" speech?

hang on.

i just made a stunning realisation that these are seven day deadlines. serves me right for skimming the OP!

i take back my post 547. spam away brave townsfolk.

~~

i also just realised jackson virgo is in the group of 4's. this is shocking play on my part. there's no way i'm executing from that bracket on D1.

i apologise to jackson virgo for my overeagerness.

UNVOTE:

Can I ask why me being in the group of 4's makes you not want to yeet me? Also don't apologize for playing the game

In post 554, JacksonVirgo wrote: No no that's not what I was saying, I was just saying that their wording was wrong

But how is that different from, like, a post on mafia discussion? He's giving his opinion on the game, unless you think he's lying it's totally NAI.

In post 556, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 554, JacksonVirgo wrote: No no that's not what I was saying, I was just saying that their wording was wrong

But how is that different from, like, a post on mafia discussion? He's giving his opinion on the game, unless you think he's lying it's totally NAI.

I dont remember ever saying it was AI?

In post 542, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 540, Something_Smart wrote:I mean, it's not exactly hard to generate reads as scum. Natural reads, maybe, but like it's also hard to generate natural reads as town.

Could you elaborate on how it's hard to generate natural reads as town? I don't understand that at all

I think you read into something that doesn't exist my man

In post 555, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can I ask why me being in the group of 4's makes you not want to yeet me? Also don't apologize for playing the game

there is max one scum amongst us 4's, unless a zany gambit is afoot.

In post 549, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 545, Infinity 324 wrote:Jackson why are you focusing on NAI stuff so much, this is literally just about theory.

I don't see it as nai but if you want to explain why that'd be neat

This is where I see you saying it was AI

I just feel like you might be avoiding game-relevant content, you asked about a couple of jokeposts of penguin's as well.

In post 550, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 548, Uncrowned wrote:I'm beginning to think that one of JV/Hoopla is scum.

Why would that be

You feel a bit less engaged in this game than I'd expect from town!JV but that could also just be how you play now compared to how you used to when we used to play together.

I don't feel like you're addressing as much readable content as I'd expect from you, and Hoopla has been the same in that regard, mostly focused on game theory and set-up discussion rather than going through real-time interactions.

I also think her callout of your 275 is kind of eh. it's not *wrong* but she gives me the vibes of a smart player who would have better reasons to vote people, especially with the way some of the slots have been interacting between one another.

I feel like you're both playing a neutral game, flying under the radar a little. Hoopla's joining of your wagon though makes me believe that if one of you is scum, the other will not be.

In post 559, Hoopla wrote:

In post 555, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can I ask why me being in the group of 4's makes you not want to yeet me? Also don't apologize for playing the game

there is max one scum amongst us 4's, unless a zany gambit is afoot.

I don't understand, why wouldn't scum do that. I could remember wrong but I think multiple scum picked the same number in the last PyP I played I'll go have a look

pedit: I thought you were talking about what I was saying on other people

All my scumleans are in the 4s lol

well

I think I can't see through some jokes and I see it as actual content too, sorry

@Skit @S_S @Infinity

sorry to be self-indulgent but do you have any thoughts on Post 552

In post 561, Uncrowned wrote:

In post 550, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 548, Uncrowned wrote:I'm beginning to think that one of JV/Hoopla is scum.

Why would that be

You feel a bit less engaged in this game than I'd expect from town!JV but that could also just be how you play now compared to how you used to when we used to play together.

I don't feel like you're addressing as much readable content as I'd expect from you, and Hoopla has been the same in that regard, mostly focused on game theory and set-up discussion rather than going through real-time interactions.

I also think her callout of your 275 is kind of eh. it's not *wrong* but she gives me the vibes of a smart player who would have better reasons to vote people, especially with the way some of the slots have been interacting between one another.

I feel like you're both playing a neutral game, flying under the radar a little. Hoopla's joining of your wagon though makes me believe that if one of you is scum, the other will not be.

I'm not sure if I'm allowed to say this but I'm in a lot of games and it's actually stressful at times since I have to work as well. Sorry dudes

In post 564, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think I can't see through some jokes and I see it as actual content too, sorry

Oh, that's ok then. I'm still sort of curious why you were pushing on s_s though.

In post 562, JacksonVirgo wrote:I don't understand, why wouldn't scum do that. I could remember wrong but I think multiple scum picked the same number in the last PyP I played I'll go have a look

pedit: I thought you were talking about what I was saying on other people

it's never happened in 15 games.

well, actually. it happened once due to a mod error of making the scumteam pick numbers without pregame coordination.

In post 567, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 564, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think I can't see through some jokes and I see it as actual content too, sorry

Oh, that's ok then. I'm still sort of curious why you were pushing on s_s though.

I wasn't pushing on them at all, I was asking them to clarify as I didn't understand and when they did I was saying that their original wording was completely wrong if that's what they meant.

Sorry, that's what I meant by pushing--you were questioning him on something that didn't seem super relevant to alignments.

That's fair JV. I don't necessarily mean your activity as a whole, but more what you're actually pulling from this thread to discuss.

In post 570, Infinity 324 wrote:Sorry, that's what I meant by pushing--you were questioning him on something that didn't seem super relevant to alignments.

Dude I was asking because I didn't understand not because I was trying to solve them, seriously?

In post 572, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 570, Infinity 324 wrote:Sorry, that's what I meant by pushing--you were questioning him on something that didn't seem super relevant to alignments.

Dude I was asking because I didn't understand not because I was trying to solve them, seriously?

Ok ok

In post 571, Uncrowned wrote:That's fair JV. I don't necessarily mean your activity as a whole, but more what you're actually pulling from this thread to discuss.

Ah gotcha, apologies I don't mean to pull what I pull that's just what comes to my head when I'm reading.