Page 23 of 60

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:41 am
by Tayl0r Swift
yep

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:42 am
by MathBlade
Lol no Taylor isn’t.

She shit posts as either alignment.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:43 am
by MathBlade
Don’t get me wrong I wish she wasn’t.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:44 am
by Tayl0r Swift
In post 552, MathBlade wrote:Don’t get me wrong I wish she wasn’t.
you wish i wasnt shitpost?
is sad, i am shitpost.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:56 am
by TemporalLich
In post 548, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im a n0 rolecop and i discovered that TL is mafia.
did you confuse role cop with alignment cop or something?

If you were actually a role cop you'd know that I'm a Dirty Inquisitor.

Besides, I'm town so your guilty is fake besides it already not making sense

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:00 am
by Nono
berty is so weird and doesn’t make sense, but w/e lolol
berty never answered my questions

logic out the window this game,, I just wanna solve, how do I solve!!

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:03 am
by Nono
berty/maths, can be a thing,, too obvious, yes, but could be bold

WHAT’S TOWNY ABOUT BERTY-PLAY

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:10 am
by Nono
can go Doubting, don’t mind at all, think fake claim doesn’t make sense from town perspective,, and role was self claim, so it’s like self meta,, “convenient” “self manipulative” if you will,,

what is “sam 100% scum” etc what!!!!!!

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:12 am
by Nono
In post 502, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 497, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
samantha97 (3):
Galron, Albert B. Rampage, MathBlade
[/area]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This is so fucking rich that I was right and ABR wasted so much time on an obvious mod error.

God damn, I need to bask in the glory of my being right.
sarcastic?? can’t tell cause i’m Bad,, but w/e

YES
you’re smart, berty, i believe, so what is this!!

logic’s dead,, i’m dead

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:12 am
by MathBlade
Nono may I ask your pronouns?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:14 am
by Nono
you can use whatever, i don’t mind,, I appreciate the question anyhow

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:15 am
by ManWithNoName
In post 558, Nono wrote:
In post 502, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 497, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
samantha97 (3):
Galron, Albert B. Rampage, MathBlade
[/area]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This is so fucking rich that I was right and ABR wasted so much time on an obvious mod error.

God damn, I need to bask in the glory of my being right.
sarcastic?? can’t tell cause i’m Bad,, but w/e

YES
you’re smart, berty, i believe, so what is this!!

logic’s dead,, i’m dead
I'm basking in the glory of my correctness there.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:17 am
by MathBlade
Alrighty. Nono my rule for reading ABR is more the level of how “right” he thinks he is.

I am pretty sure he’s town because of how abrasive he is.

Yes it sucks. But I think it’s a good rule.

I think there’s an underlying context you’re not seeing yet and probably won’t until I am dead.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:19 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 501, MathBlade wrote:Who do you wanna Vig ABR?
i dont believe the vig claim

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:27 am
by MathBlade
In post 563, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 501, MathBlade wrote:Who do you wanna Vig ABR?
i dont believe the vig claim
Right. I am 50/50 on it. That’s why we can leash him.

If the claim is true the person dies.
If the claim is false then the person doesn’t die and we eliminate DT

The only way this fails if DT is scum assuming single ball is if scum kill the person DT was supposed to vig.

So then win win?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:27 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 555, Nono wrote:berty never answered my questions
you didn't ask me any questions :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:29 am
by Albert B. Rampage
call me by my name or abr or rampage btw.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:30 am
by Albert B. Rampage
In post 564, MathBlade wrote:
In post 563, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 501, MathBlade wrote:Who do you wanna Vig ABR?
i dont believe the vig claim
Right. I am 50/50 on it. That’s why we can leash him.

If the claim is true the person dies.
If the claim is false then the person doesn’t die and we eliminate DT

The only way this fails if DT is scum assuming single ball is if scum kill the person DT was supposed to vig.

So then win win?
sure, you take the lead on that

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:33 am
by MathBlade
Already was trying to by asking your opinion to try to start a second unofficial VC of who to vig.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:57 am
by Albert B. Rampage
I want Sam dead

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:00 am
by MathBlade
In post 569, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I want Sam dead
Okay.

Unofficial Vig VC {{Assuming the person you’re voting is eliminated}}

Sam — Math

Not voting everyone else

Iirc you’re voting Sam so assume Sam is elimed who would you vig?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:21 am
by ManWithNoName
Can I make a vig vote to shoot the moon?

Thanks!

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:21 am
by PlusJOYED
why is sam scum?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:23 am
by ManWithNoName
In post 572, PlusJOYED wrote:why is sam scum?
I believe the answer is because ABR has stamped his foot as he's continually said it, at this point.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:24 am
by PlusJOYED
if we go an inactive slot I think nono would be a good choice