Mafiascum.net

with cheeky? yeah i agree

In post 550, Nero Cain wrote:with cheeky? yeah i agree

I see that as possible.

My running theory

Is cheeky hawker gamma plus quiet

In post 521, DrippingGoofball wrote:To be fair, your demise was inevitable due to your interaction with scum!Iecerint.

Mmm, no, my demise was inevitable because you propagandized even yourself by coloring my name red in your VCA. Bad Goof. But I appreciate you pointing out that I've had incorrect reads before. It'll be helpful later when you get cranky at me for having incorrect reads.

In post 551, Titus wrote:Is cheeky hawker gamma plus quiet

Is this your batting order?

In the time I wrote that post, Mom decided they didn’t like the DGB vote anymore. Can you explain why you voted them initially? For me, it was the joke thing about the oops my PT thread (I think I just hate those jokes), and the general admission that “well I’m always scumread so I guess I’ll have to constantly push against this”. Didn’t feel productive, not a lot of substance, I was okay with the vote. Also what changed?

Then DGB posted a thing I liked. I agree, cheeky is not the biggest lurker.

My lurkery scum read is Hayker, personally.

So I’ve decided that I’m terrible at cold reads, I think I made the wrong call, and will be voting Joyad instead.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: plusJoyed

In post 553, chkflip wrote:

In post 551, Titus wrote:Is cheeky hawker gamma plus quiet

Is this your batting order?

No particular order

Ah right you're a pool girl, my bad. I forgot.

I'm not voting Cheeky for lurking
I was good to let NPOM be for putting that as his reason but now people are using that as a way to discredit it so I'm making it clear, no that's not my logic at all, lurking technically has to do with it but just in general cheeky is scummy

@norweigianEE, how do you propose to give the game a push?

@gamma cheeky could be scummy, but not with the info I have. If you have a better read I’m happy to hear it. Otherwise, it feels better to push there in a day or two from my perspective. I’m not discrediting the suspicion, just don’t like that wagon rn.

It’s my understanding that it’s good to push productive wagons, especially this early in the day? But maybe I’m missing something. Is cheeky your most scummy read?

In post 420, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: cheekyteeky

In post 418, CheekyTeeky wrote:Sorry guys for the mass spam I don't have much time but that should be enough stirring until my return xx

This is a scum approach

*sees post number* Nice.

Just do the gamestate a favor and just start from the beginning.

My point was to ask if that scum read was strong enough to push a wagon on someone who isn’t here. Maybe it is. I don’t know. I would prefer to wait till the weekend.

In post 547, Nero Cain wrote:my problem with Molla is that him fakeclaiming miller is a bit

lamist

. by retracting his claim he saves himself from certain death. I kinda have the tinfoil that BB and npom were doing some gambit or something.

What is lamist againt? I keep thinking it should be "lamest."

In post 561, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 547, Nero Cain wrote:my problem with Molla is that him fakeclaiming miller is a bit

lamist

. by retracting his claim he saves himself from certain death. I kinda have the tinfoil that BB and npom were doing some gambit or something.

What is lamist againt? I keep thinking it should be "lamest."

Look at me i am so town = lamist

Go ahead and swap Molla for quiet in my theory.

So you follow Nero on molla, but not NPOM?

Nero, please tell me your molla/NPOM theory.

In post 564, chkflip wrote:So you follow Nero on molla, but not NPOM?

Nero, please tell me your molla/NPOM theory.

I see Molla as possible scum and have NPOM as town. I don't see why the two must be linked.

In post 538, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 534, BBmolla wrote:

In post 505, NorwegianboyEE wrote:heybbmolla heybbmolla heybbmolla

hello

the Cheeky votes are boring

If one of them flips scum, both are scum.

she might be scum for the samantha replacement info, but other than that they're still boring votes. we know cheeky will post more content, there are loads more lurkfucks to sift through.

what's the boring tell cause I can probably disprove it, if not now then I will post game lel

In post 541, Hayker wrote:

In post 111, BBmolla wrote:im not a miller but look how much fun we had

I don't know how I missed this before. Probably trying to play these games with just my phone. You fake claimed miller? Was this move just for discussion purposes? This does not feel townie at all to me. Miller can cause a lot of chaos and confusion to the town, and fake claiming it at that.

Heybbmolla

BBmolla

Yeah I have a hard time with larges, but if something interesting happens early I have an easier time getting into it.

if I was scum I'd have stuck with it tbh

In post 547, Nero Cain wrote:my problem with Molla is that him fakeclaiming miller is a bit

lamist

. by retracting his claim he saves himself from certain death. I kinda have the tinfoil that BB and npom were doing some gambit or something.

i mean that's fair cause I would do that but I didn't

In post 548, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 379, BBmolla wrote:nero's bad reads probably make him town tbh

and this is pssible TMI. How does he know the alignments of 5 other players? If not why are my reads "bad"?

lmfao

In post 549, Titus wrote:

In post 546, quiet wrote:Me newbie, I’d guess.
Read over the existing wagons. I like cheaky’s least, and it’s not like we really get anything out of pushing on it if they’re away till the weekend. Save it for later and more posts imo.
Don’t like the mini wagon either.

I do like DGB’s and Joyads a lot more.

Between the two, DGB pinged me more, and I like the people on that wagon more, too. Posting off phone so quoting specifics is proving to be a pain, but I’m happy to elaborate. For now, I’m jumping on board.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: DrippingGoofball

This is scum.

I think quiet just seems scummy as a player. I don't like his swift backoff though.

im thoroughly enjoying these theories about me being scum

Should I TM an axis of evil in this game?

lots of Beetlejuice from molla

i was saying that 16 17 23 and 24 is possibly a staged conversation.

In post 566, BBmolla wrote:

In post 548, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 379, BBmolla wrote:nero's bad reads probably make him town tbh

and this is pssible TMI. How does he know the alignments of 5 other players? If not why are my reads "bad"?

lmfao

not helping

I think that's a little early for bussing.

In post 570, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 566, BBmolla wrote:

In post 548, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 379, BBmolla wrote:nero's bad reads probably make him town tbh

and this is pssible TMI. How does he know the alignments of 5 other players? If not why are my reads "bad"?

lmfao

not helping

your fucking logic is ridiculous here nero do I actually need to explain why it's ridiculous

In post 568, Nero Cain wrote:lots of Beetlejuice from molla

I'm very unbusy at the moment

In post 572, BBmolla wrote:

In post 570, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 566, BBmolla wrote:

In post 548, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 379, BBmolla wrote:nero's bad reads probably make him town tbh

and this is pssible TMI. How does he know the alignments of 5 other players? If not why are my reads "bad"?

lmfao

not helping

your fucking logic is ridiculous here nero do I actually need to explain why it's ridiculous

yes