Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:30 pm
Boon uPick
Doubles’ Mafia
ISO me in both games.
Doubles’ Mafia
ISO me in both games.
Page 23 of 88
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:30 pm
Maybe later
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:31 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:32 pm
It’s not “self-meta”, you can literally ISO me and have it proven what you’re saying about my reaction being “way more defensive” here, is bs.In post 549, Superb Subtlety wrote:I don't know if it's town indicative or scum indicative and I don't trust self meta on this
I will reach a conclusion when I do; it doesn't particularly help for you to jump to conclusions on my behalf or to throw self meta at me
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:34 pm
I mean, it kinda is self meta, yeah
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:37 pm
How do you figure that? You or anyone in this game can ISO me in both games and draw their OWN conclusions from that.In post 554, Superb Subtlety wrote:I mean, it kinda is self meta, yeah
It’s nothing to do with MY opinion.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:39 pm
You've consistently reacted defensively to things that weren't pushes after I told you I wasn't pushing you
It reads as super paranoid, especially when I'm someone that you consider good at reading you
But it's not damning because i do know how you play, so I don't have a firm read on you right now. I'm going to think about it. Preferably after you tell me where I shaded you
PEdit: It's self meta because the argument is about how defensive you normally are, which is subjective. It's something that different players can have a different opinion on, rather than objective fact. Which makes it somewhat meaningless from yourself
It reads as super paranoid, especially when I'm someone that you consider good at reading you
But it's not damning because i do know how you play, so I don't have a firm read on you right now. I'm going to think about it. Preferably after you tell me where I shaded you
PEdit: It's self meta because the argument is about how defensive you normally are, which is subjective. It's something that different players can have a different opinion on, rather than objective fact. Which makes it somewhat meaningless from yourself
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:47 pm
My point is that you’re obviously wrong and anyone who ISOs me in both of those games will clearly see that but if you want to keep wrongly accusing me of somehow being “super paranoid” or whatever than I’m afraid I can’t help you with that.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:48 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:49 pm
This is not a question that should take this long to answer
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:50 pm
I mean how much more mod confirmed can you get? I don’t even understand why I’m being questioned for any of the Koalawang stuff?In post 264, Krazy wrote:
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:51 pm
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:51 pm
In post 559, Superb Subtlety wrote:This is not a question that should take this long to answer
Oh now I’m on some timer? Yeah no.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:52 pm
In post 561, Superb Subtlety wrote:
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:53 pm
@SS please let me know when you’re actually reading and not ignoring my responses. Tyvm.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:53 pm
You haven't answered my question
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:54 pm
I have countless times already, not my fault you aren’t reading.In post 565, Superb Subtlety wrote:You haven't answered my question
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:55 pm
I'm reading your responses but I'm not interested in continuing the conversation in any direction other than one that contains an answer to my question
PEdit: If there was an answer to my question it would include somewhere where you quoted me shading you
PEdit: If there was an answer to my question it would include somewhere where you quoted me shading you
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:56 pm
This is aside from the koalawang questioning being after you said I shaded you
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:57 pm
You have repeatedly misrepped my posting, ignored/discredited my responses and then you inexplicably keep saying that I haven’t answered something I’ve already responded to a gazillion times.In post 566, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:I have countless times already, not my fault you aren’t reading.In post 565, Superb Subtlety wrote:You haven't answered my question
So you want me to keep repeating myself a gazillion more and will still misrep me and claim I didn’t answer your question?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 8:58 pm
To what were you referring in this post when you said I "shaded [you] for no good reason whatsoever", and then again said that I "keep wrongly shading you for no good reason" as though it had happened multiple times in the game?In post 517, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:You seriously think scum!Noraa does this as a fakeclaim? Really? I’m really trying to figure out if your slot is being deliberately obtuse or whether you’re actually scum. You shade me for no good reason whatsoever, now you’re also accusing Noraa of lying too?In post 509, Superb Subtlety wrote:A town godfather would do the same as a scum godfather
A godfather always appears as town to alignment checks
Not that hard to comprehend. I've put a scum miller in a setup before and it's the same theory
-jj
Mine is mod confirmed and also negative utility because had Penguin been voting us, we’d now be self-voting.
Tell me why tf Noraa is even bothering to claim this role since she isn’t even being run up. If I could change my vote, I’d probably switch it to you. It’s scummy af for you to keep wrongly shading me for no good reason whatsoever.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:00 pm
Then read my posts and if it still doesn’t sink in, read them again and again - as many times as necessary because I don’t even know wtf you’re even talking about any more? How many more times is it necessary for me to keep repeating myself?In post 567, Superb Subtlety wrote:I'm reading your responses but I'm not interested in continuing the conversation in any direction other than one that contains an answer to my question
PEdit: If there was an answer to my question it would include somewhere where you quoted me shading you
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:03 pm
Are you or are you not accusing me of lying abour the post restriction or are you going to now accuse me of hallucinating that or something?In post 570, Superb Subtlety wrote:To what were you referring in this post when you said I "shaded [you] for no good reason whatsoever", and then again said that I "keep wrongly shading you for no good reason" as though it had happened multiple times in the game?In post 517, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:You seriously think scum!Noraa does this as a fakeclaim? Really? I’m really trying to figure out if your slot is being deliberately obtuse or whether you’re actually scum. You shade me for no good reason whatsoever, now you’re also accusing Noraa of lying too?In post 509, Superb Subtlety wrote:A town godfather would do the same as a scum godfather
A godfather always appears as town to alignment checks
Not that hard to comprehend. I've put a scum miller in a setup before and it's the same theory
-jj
Mine is mod confirmed and also negative utility because had Penguin been voting us, we’d now be self-voting.
Tell me why tf Noraa is even bothering to claim this role since she isn’t even being run up. If I could change my vote, I’d probably switch it to you. It’s scummy af for you to keep wrongly shading me for no good reason whatsoever.
Are you saying I actually misunderstood you? Am I losing my mind?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:28 pm
I have at no point accused you of lying about the post restriction
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:29 pm
Furthermore, all but one post relating to your role has been after you accused me of shading you repeatedly. Which brings me to a familiar question...