Mafiascum.net

In post 548, Jake The Wolfie wrote:strictly anti-town in any game that you're in

RQS is strictly anti-town in any game that it's in

In post 551, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 548, Jake The Wolfie wrote:strictly anti-town in any game that you're in

RQS is strictly anti-town in any game that it's in

This may be true, but it is in the town's best interest to get rid of you because you are more destructive than RQS.

VOTE: Rannygazoo

Serious vote

In post 27, Rannygazoo wrote:Never played without default daytalk before. Let’s nip them in the bud before they can coordinate. VOTE: T3

In post 37, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 28, Roden wrote:

In post 20, T3 wrote:By the way, I think I should claim here. I'm an Informed Miller.

This is only my second game, so I had to look up what this is. Interesting role tbh. I guess the only way to verify this would be if a Gunsmith checked you?

Also, I'm assuming you need to save this information for later. Otherwise you'd just tell us.

UNVOTE: T3

VOTE: Rannygazoo since he voted for an (alleged) Informed Miller.

Bold of you to assume I read RVS

VOTE: excallq

In post 38, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 29, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Unrelated note: Do not harrass the Mafia, as they are a Minority. Instead, harrass the town.

This post was inspired by rule 4

Hmm, yes, very wise

In post 43, Rannygazoo wrote:Is this scummy self-awareness too?

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

In post 50, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 45, bugspray wrote:

In post 43, Rannygazoo wrote:Is this scummy self-awareness too?

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

thats clearly ironic and you're scum for trying to deflect off your partner

Your case is paper-thin and your deflection is pathetic. Your bloodline will not survive the winter.

In post 67, Rannygazoo wrote:On the contrary, if you think about it for a moment, I think you’ll agree that it makes sense to pay more attention to the stuff that’s posted after my first post.

In post 75, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.

Explain how I clearly was. I think my shift from being in the game to not being in the game is pretty clear.

Titus has played with me before and she can confirm that I don’t always read carefully in the beginning. Or maybe she doesn’t pay that much attention to my play, I dunno.

In post 76, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.

Am I shading Roden? I feel like I’m just trying address their doubts about me while assuming good faith.

In post 196, Rannygazoo wrote:No wait let’s see if this goes anywhere
VOTE: Excallq

These are all scum posts

In post 549, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 85, cw357 wrote:ill do RQS

VOTE: cw357

Eliminate this

He's a claimed doctor

VOTE: NotMafia

Boom, gottem.

What were you actually?

That hammert was unexpected

In post 557, Egix96 wrote:What were you actually?

In post 556, Egix96 wrote:

In post 549, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 85, cw357 wrote:ill do RQS

VOTE: cw357

Eliminate this

He's a claimed doctor

VOTE: NotMafia

Boom, gottem.

^Scum quickhammer, I would know

Rannygazoo/egix96/?

In post 559, Not_Mafia wrote:^Scum quickhammer, I would know

Bzzzt. I was already voting your slot!

Scum fakehammer, I would know

Please self-hammer if you want to be helpful here.

Eliminate Rannygazoo if want to be helpful

I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

wait im still voting ranny
UNVOTE:
[unv][/unv]
i forget which tga lol

sorry i need to read up on not_mafia cuz idk whats happening

In post 555, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 27, Rannygazoo wrote:Never played without default daytalk before. Let’s nip them in the bud before they can coordinate. VOTE: T3

In post 37, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 28, Roden wrote:

In post 20, T3 wrote:By the way, I think I should claim here. I'm an Informed Miller.

This is only my second game, so I had to look up what this is. Interesting role tbh. I guess the only way to verify this would be if a Gunsmith checked you?

Also, I'm assuming you need to save this information for later. Otherwise you'd just tell us.

UNVOTE: T3

VOTE: Rannygazoo since he voted for an (alleged) Informed Miller.

Bold of you to assume I read RVS

VOTE: excallq

In post 38, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 29, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Unrelated note: Do not harrass the Mafia, as they are a Minority. Instead, harrass the town.

This post was inspired by rule 4

Hmm, yes, very wise

In post 43, Rannygazoo wrote:Is this scummy self-awareness too?

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

In post 50, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 45, bugspray wrote:

In post 43, Rannygazoo wrote:Is this scummy self-awareness too?

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

thats clearly ironic and you're scum for trying to deflect off your partner

Your case is paper-thin and your deflection is pathetic. Your bloodline will not survive the winter.

In post 67, Rannygazoo wrote:On the contrary, if you think about it for a moment, I think you’ll agree that it makes sense to pay more attention to the stuff that’s posted after my first post.

In post 75, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.

Explain how I clearly was. I think my shift from being in the game to not being in the game is pretty clear.

Titus has played with me before and she can confirm that I don’t always read carefully in the beginning. Or maybe she doesn’t pay that much attention to my play, I dunno.

In post 76, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.

Am I shading Roden? I feel like I’m just trying address their doubts about me while assuming good faith.

In post 196, Rannygazoo wrote:No wait let’s see if this goes anywhere
VOTE: Excallq

These are all scum posts

heh
for some reason i was voting ranny (probably OMGUS from earlier)
but i dont agree with not_mafia on this
like some of the posts are a little odd (scummish perhaps) but most of them certainly don't have apparent scum motivation to them

ig t3 and i can vig and town-doc someone if t3 agrees
maybe that can be some sort of poe thing
only issue is if t3 is scum :/

oh not_mafia = excallq

ig id be willing to jump on that wagon (not that i wasn't on it already) but we're obviously not hammerinig yet

t3 if u want to vig jessica rabbit tonight ill do the town-doc

In post 423, excallq wrote:

In post 421, cw357 wrote:ok i actually called this out earlier but shouldn't u have towny self-awareness, having no self-awareness sounds like scum trying to obscure their alignment

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar

wut

yeah consider my vote on not_mafia as pre-emptively placed

I wouldn't mind if you hammered them, but I think we should wait for Bugthey's replacement so that if they have an ability, they can more-effectively use it