Mafiascum.net

boop

In post 549, House wrote:

In post 548, PenguinPower wrote:How many games have you played since your return?

Not many.

Perhaps consider your experience isn’t applicable with the current player base.

Not trying to dodge, just don't know the exact number. Just that it hasn't been many.

My last question to you was sincere, by the way.

As were the ones before that, even if you disagree.

In post 551, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 549, House wrote:

In post 548, PenguinPower wrote:How many games have you played since your return?

Not many.

Perhaps consider your experience isn’t applicable with the current player base.

Maybe so, but it's all i have to operate from.

In post 552, House wrote:My last question to you was sincere, by the way.

As was my prior statement.

In post 553, House wrote:Maybe so, but it's all i have to operate from.

In post 541, House wrote:It's not a terrible thing to be a follower.

In post 554, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 552, House wrote:My last question to you was sincere, by the way.

As was my prior statement.

That statement was not in response to my question.

I'd really like to know where you get the idea that I'm engaging you in bad faith. Apparently, I'm miscommunicating, and I'd like to know how so i can fix it.

In post 555, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 553, House wrote:Maybe so, but it's all i have to operate from.

In post 541, House wrote:It's not a terrible thing to be a follower.

I don't trust people, so... damn the luck.

In post 557, House wrote:

In post 555, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 553, House wrote:Maybe so, but it's all i have to operate from.

In post 541, House wrote:It's not a terrible thing to be a follower.

I don't trust people, so... damn the luck.

In post 541, House wrote:I've done the same.

In post 544, the worst wrote:I don't have a strong read there at all, but I also don't really think either of those users respond to early wagons in a way that's useful. :p

Something something insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

In post 558, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 557, House wrote:

In post 555, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 553, House wrote:Maybe so, but it's all i have to operate from.

In post 541, House wrote:It's not a terrible thing to be a follower.

I don't trust people, so... damn the luck.

In post 541, House wrote:I've done the same.

Notice the difference.

Past tense vs present tense.

It's not that hard if you think about it.

I trusted players that i had built up a rapport with. Since my return, 99% of those players are gone, and my rapport with those who are still here still needs to be rebuilt.

It's not rocket surgery.

Now, how am i engaging you in bad faith?

Mmhmmm. Nice try.

In post 534, PenguinPower wrote:Perhaps you should attempt to learn how I form my opinions rather than cast descriptors to me that applicable.

I’m feeling nice for some reason so I will actually repeat the obvious statement which you aren’t trying to do.

Because you felt it was better to make a witty remark instead of actually efforting.

In post 561, PenguinPower wrote:Mmhmmm. Nice try.

No, the nice try is to you for trying to bait me off Gamma.

If he isn't going to have actions taken against his ban baiting from above, I'm staying parked here.

I think Thor might be a good wagon. Thor ignoring my reachout is bugging me. He's a big stats guy...until asked to follow up on it.

In post 564, House wrote:

In post 561, PenguinPower wrote:Mmhmmm. Nice try.

No, the nice try is to you for trying to bait me off Gamma.

If he isn't going to have actions taken against his ban baiting from above, I'm staying parked here.

wtf? I haven’t tried to make you do anything?

In post 563, PenguinPower wrote:Because you felt it was better to make a witty remark instead of actually efforting.

That's a terrible assumption. Had my interest been only in making a witty remark, i wouldn't have relentlessly hounded you about it afterwards.

Nice skipover.

This is why your bad faith. I tried. Good night.

In post 568, PenguinPower wrote:Nice skipover.

This is why your bad faith. I tried. Good night.

Hold on... what did i skip over?

In post 565, Titus wrote:I think Thor might be a good wagon. Thor ignoring my reachout is bugging me. He's a big stats guy...until asked to follow up on it.

His hop on to Gamma did strike me as odd considering he didn't offer any other reasons or support for the wagon.

In post 562, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 534, PenguinPower wrote:Perhaps you should attempt to learn how I form my opinions rather than cast descriptors to me that aren't [sic] applicable.

I’m feeling nice for some reason so I will actually repeat the obvious statement which you aren’t trying to do.

I didn't skip this. I MISSED it.

Rude assumption is rude.

To respond to this, that post looked to me to be an evasion, as what you are saying there directly contradicts your willingness to vote me "if I'm the leading wagon".

It's a natural inference to make, so i don't understand why you're so twisted over it.

I think you guys are just talking past each other and don't think either side is really coming at this in bad faith.

I'm not feeling so that great about my interaction with Penguin.

Sure, i poked him. That's part of the game. Thing is, I went out of my way, multiple times, to avoid abrasiveness, and he turned evasive & abrasive over innocuous questions.

If my perspective was skewed, he could have easily told me how instead of getting crappy with me.

Feels to me like he didn't like our interaction and has been trying to "turn it off" before suspicion sets in on him.

In post 573, House wrote:Feels to me like he didn't like our interaction and has been trying to "turn it off" before suspicion sets in on him.

Yes, he doesn't like your interaction and has been trying to turn it off. I sincerely doubt this is because of his alignment.

I recommend you just drop it.