Mafiascum.net

no, you didn't mean it as a general concept. You specifically mentioned my slot twice right after the theory

VOTE: Eyes without a face

In post 548, Frozen Angel wrote:Like I wasn't even posting there why did you say fa didn't like it if it was not you pointing finger toward my slot?

because

In post 273, Frozen Angel wrote:203

In post 217, Eyes without a face wrote:Early townreads on both Andante and Dwlee for seemingly being the driving forces of the game getting out of RVS so quickly.

what?! I just read the game and this just makes no sense

In post 550, Frozen Angel wrote:no, you didn't mean it as a general concept. You specifically mentioned my slot twice right after the theory

VOTE: Eyes without a face

OK. I apologize for greeting you (first mention) and I sincerely apologize for caring to consider your opinion (second mention). I will ignore you for the rest of the game if that makes you feel better.

Hey fellows: from this point on I will refrain from menti4oning a certain someone's name because apparently mentioning their name is a sign of FoS pointed and them. If anyone wishes to be added to my to be ignored list 4don't be shy to ask

In post 551, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 548, Frozen Angel wrote:Like I wasn't even posting there why did you say fa didn't like it if it was not you pointing finger toward my slot?

because

In post 273, Frozen Angel wrote:203

In post 217, Eyes without a face wrote:Early townreads on both Andante and Dwlee for seemingly being the driving forces of the game getting out of RVS so quickly.

what?! I just read the game and this just makes no sense

so you're saying you didn't say the theory to even remotely hint that you

and the greeting was just a greeting

and that

In post 414, fireisredsir wrote:eyes, is that the only thought you have on the thread? more please, give some opinions on people at least

In post 415, Eyes without a face wrote:I already did and fa didn't like it.

This was in reference to me saying "you state that you have early tr on adante and dwlee for taking the game out of RVS, making no sense"?

And to keep everyone in context here's why I mentioned that someone the second time

In post 414, fireisredsir wrote:eyes, is that the only thought you have on the thread? more please, give some opinions on people at least

In post 415, Eyes without a face wrote:I already did and fa didn't like it.

tw4o adha4cent posts. fire is asking me to give opinions and I said that I already did and someone didn't like them and my proof id in 551 above

In post 554, Frozen Angel wrote: so you're saying you didn't say the theory to even remotely hint that you

find me scummier than others

and the greeting was just a greeting

and that

In post 414, fireisredsir wrote:eyes, is that the only thought you have on the thread? more please, give some opinions on people at least

In post 415, Eyes without a face wrote:I already did and fa didn't like it.

This was in reference to me saying "you state that you have early tr on adante and dwlee for taking the game out of RVS, making no sense"?

correct

How do you feel about how different slots reacted to you getting heat and voted?

can you try to analyze the votes/suspicions against you?

Dwlee's reaction was by far the worst. 4Yours was weird and tilted I can't decide for sure but I think it's a personal trait. Nero's was the best and Stephen didn't address it I don't think

what about greetings, Hockey's and fires takes on it

can you elaborate on why you think Nero's reaction was the best and dwlee's was worse?

In post 559, Frozen Angel wrote:what about greetings, Hockey's and fires takes on it

can you elaborate on why you think Nero's reaction was the best and dwlee's was worse?

Greeting, Hockey and fire are not even replacements so the intended pressure wasn't directed at them. Nero's reaction was good because he acknowledged the existence of a=such a theory even if he personally didn't believe in it. Dwlee was bad because they voted me without trying to engage or discuss the theory at all. It looked like a reason they used to place a vote on someone they thought might be an easy lim

In post 560, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 559, Frozen Angel wrote:what about greetings, Hockey's and fires takes on it

can you elaborate on why you think Nero's reaction was the best and dwlee's was worse?

Greeting, Hockey and fire are not even replacements so the intended pressure wasn't directed at them. Nero's reaction was good because he acknowledged the existence of a=such a theory even if he personally didn't believe in it. Dwlee was bad because they voted me without trying to engage or discuss the theory at all. It looked like a reason they used to place a vote on someone they thought might be an easy lim

if it's what you thought, why you didn't vote dwelee back

because that would have been used against me by scum and ignorant town alike. It would have been portrayed as an OMGUS vote nno more.

In post 562, Eyes without a face wrote:because that would have been used against me by scum and ignorant town alike. It would have been portrayed as an OMGUS vote nno more.

so scared that it would be called omgus and you would gain more heat, you decided to hide your suspicion on the slot you actually scum read the most because of the way they reacted to you

If you are generally a person who cares about not getting heat why did you announce that theory about replacements knowing you would gain heat for it (as you mentioned you know that you would)

Vote me back or die a coward

In post 563, Frozen Angel wrote:If you are generally a person who cares about not getting heat why did you announce that theory about replacements knowing you would gain heat for it (as you mentioned you know that you would)

I am not scared of getting heat for a purpose but it's foolish to spoil your case before you think you can win it

In post 564, Dwlee99 wrote:Vote me back or die a coward

He claimed we understood it wrong that he was hinting at my slot with his theory posted

what do you about what he said? how will this change your opinion on the slot if it will?

In post 565, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 563, Frozen Angel wrote:If you are generally a person who cares about not getting heat why did you announce that theory about replacements knowing you would gain heat for it (as you mentioned you know that you would)

I am not scared of getting heat for a purpose but it's foolish to spoil your case before you think you can win it

Can I get a link or two to your previously finished town games if possible?

I want to come back to this later on.

In post 566, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 564, Dwlee99 wrote:Vote me back or die a coward

He claimed we understood it wrong that he was hinting at my slot with his theory posted

what do you about what he said? how will this change your opinion on the slot if it will?

Yes. I think they are still scum

That they're hedgy around voting me for something they think is scummy just further cements it for me

In post 564, Dwlee99 wrote:Vote me back or die a coward

I suspect I know your real identity

also eye why is your vote still on Greeting

do you think you're winning a case against them?

In post 567, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 565, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 563, Frozen Angel wrote:If you are generally a person who cares about not getting heat why did you announce that theory about replacements knowing you would gain heat for it (as you mentioned you know that you would)

I am not scared of getting heat for a purpose but it's foolish to spoil your case before you think you can win it

Can I get a link or two to your previously finished town games if possible?

I want to come back to this later on.

Your join date is 2015. Surely you know how to get to my topics from my profile

No offense to any Bufords out there but I would hate to be named Buford.

In post 570, Frozen Angel wrote:also eye why is your vote still on Greeting

because I didn't vote anyone since I put that on rvs