Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2022 3:10 pm
Alright well my jimmies are in fully rustled position again so I'm going to go finish reading No Country for Old Men and hope I can return to a state of serenity again one day
The "it" In this sentence is people accusing you of speaking in convoluted ways?In post 547, Prism wrote:It's also been a very effective and frequently used tactic against me, and Aristeia has seen it in action
Haha, sorry! Didn't mean to set you off. But thank you for explaining on both fronts. Feel like I understand your pov better now.In post 550, Prism wrote:Alright well my jimmies are in fully rustled position again so I'm going to go finish reading No Country for Old Men and hope I can return to a state of serenity again one day
I am indeed, tyIn post 553, Prism wrote:you're not fuckin welcome
jk hope ur enjoying being freed from the tyranny of the aviation industry
Ah, that makes more sense. And yes, that is frustrating.In post 556, Prism wrote:Sorry, not the accusation itself.
Intentionally responding in ways thatmakethe argument inaccessible and labyrinthine, which gets dismissed as TvT garbage
I thought you were TRing prism already?In post 557, skitter30 wrote:I am indeed, tyIn post 553, Prism wrote:you're not fuckin welcome
jk hope ur enjoying being freed from the tyranny of the aviation industry
Also prism is officially a tr for me mow as well
The reason I did not understand your argument is because I was confused about how you could feel that strongly about something that is incredibly weak and borderline nonsensical to me.In post 547, Prism wrote:I felt 197 was intentionally shifting the discussion to something more favorable underhandedly rather than a direct refutation. Playing the "I don't understand" card simultaneously when I looped its point back around to the original argument had me in disbelief. I interpreted it as a glimmer of understanding and sleight of hand, so yes, it felt incredibly malicious.
Aristeia has previously accused me of intentionally making things convoluted/hard to understand, in another we had a postgame blowup about how she wanted to pick a miserable fight with me only to tactically replace out when it was started on my terms, and I didn't think it was evenslightlydifficult to understand for someone familiar with the feedback I directly gave her. It's also been a very effective and frequently used tactic against me, and Aristeia has seen it in action.
I thought Aristeia would headhunt and play dumb as scum, absolutely. I don't think she'd actually abandon pushing, though, if those were really her motivations.
Was she making a case on you? Doesn't seem like prism is even clear about your alignment.In post 565, Aristeia wrote:But as it has now been explained to me over and over there is none so I'm going to just ignore your "case" on me as it feels not even worth addressing atp.
Have you actually studied any prism town games?In post 557, skitter30 wrote:I am indeed, tyIn post 553, Prism wrote:you're not fuckin welcome
jk hope ur enjoying being freed from the tyranny of the aviation industry
Also prism is officially a tr for me mow as well
I meant scum games.In post 568, Aristeia wrote:Have you actually studied any prism town games?In post 557, skitter30 wrote:I am indeed, tyIn post 553, Prism wrote:you're not fuckin welcome
jk hope ur enjoying being freed from the tyranny of the aviation industry
Also prism is officially a tr for me mow as well
If you figure out how to read me, let me know. I have no idea.In post 521, Prism wrote:I feel like I am going to have to meta all of Baltar, Cephir, and fireisredsir to have any idea how to read them and I straight up do not want to do that
My other idea is just burn the skitter and honestly good chance it works good but god help us all if it doesn't and that approach would probably tilt her off the end of the earth.