I just realized pretty much everyone who wasn't scumreading me is dead. This sucks.
That's a dumb reason Nugs. If we were talking about another player I don't think you would be able to convince me that it was more likely that I made a PT mistake over me just not remembering exactly what Piper said fifty pages ago.
Also Dwlee stop ignoring me, do you have any useful results or not?
I also want an update on Piper's supposedly devious plan to break the game open if they got some breathing room.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 2:06 pm
by Mirhawk
well except Dwlee and Dramonic. Piper doesn't count, they're probably scum.
In post 5489, itlepip wrote:Yo, can someone run by me why Dwlee deathtunneled TPP for what he saw a slight inconsistency about roles but he isn't with flubber even though its a kind of CC?
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
Because those happened before what I'm seeing now
<3 good answer.
this is scummy
Not really. I asked him why he did/didn't do something, and his explanation makes sense. I already knew the answer, but was checking to see if he was going to try to create a reason when the chronology of events is pretty clearly laid out.
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
Because those happened before what I'm seeing now
<3 good answer.
Pip rating scale.
This post is hereby declared NAI
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 5:23 pm
by Flubbernugget
I genuinely thought Mirhawk was at L1 with my vote but I seem to have brought a stream of intentional reaction tests to the game with it and they're all fucking shit.
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 11:55 pm
by Rob14
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 12:27 am
by Mirhawk
@flubber
In post 5501, Mirhawk wrote:That's a dumb reason Nugs. If we were talking about another player I don't think you would be able to convince me that it was more likely that I made a PT mistake over me just not remembering exactly what Piper said fifty pages ago.
I'd also like to hear from more people as to why the case I laid out on Piper yesterday is less than compelling. Assume I'm not scum for a moment, why don't you agree with it?
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
Because those happened before what I'm seeing now
<3 good answer.
this is scummy
Not really. I asked him why he did/didn't do something, and his explanation makes sense. I already knew the answer, but was checking to see if he was going to try to create a reason when the chronology of events is pretty clearly laid out.
In law I think this is called leading, also confirmation bias? I'm going to meta you now
In post 5496, Flubbernugget wrote:For those following at home I still think Mirhawk slipped role hunting he was doing in a scum pt. This actually works perfectly if dwlee is a scum tracker too.
....
Why have you previously expressed a degree of dissatisfaction with my slot and/or the Mirhawk push if you feel that way?
Because those happened before what I'm seeing now
<3 good answer.
this is scummy
Not really. I asked him why he did/didn't do something, and his explanation makes sense. I already knew the answer, but was checking to see if he was going to try to create a reason when the chronology of events is pretty clearly laid out.
In law I think this is called leading, also confirmation bias? I'm going to meta you now
Confirmation bias is the interpretation of events based on a pre-existing conclusion regarding said events - that is, seeking to (consciously or not) find evidence to support a position, rather than looking at the evidence objectively and seeing what conclusion it leads you to. Asking a question with knowledge of what the simplest answer is is a very different thing; it's nothing more than giving him enough rope to hang himself with, which he didn't do.
It is, however, leading, yes. I did ask him a question which was deliberately phrased in a way that could give him cause to think there should be some other reason.
In post 5501, Mirhawk wrote:That's a dumb reason Nugs. If we were talking about another player I don't think you would be able to convince me that it was more likely that I made a PT mistake over me just not remembering exactly what Piper said fifty pages ago.
I'd also like to hear from more people as to why the case I laid out on Piper yesterday is less than compelling. Assume I'm not scum for a moment, why don't you agree with it?
I would expect you to look into it
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 4:43 am
by Mirhawk
Look into what? There's only two possible scenarios, either I'm scum and I made a PT slip or I didn't remember exactly what piper said two weeks ago.
My point is that I don't think you would be able to convince me that the former is more likely than the latter. So what makes you do sure this is the case?
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 4:44 am
by Mirhawk
*so sure
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 4:47 am
by Mirhawk
@cerb
You realize pretty much everything pipes said to me is heavily skewed by confirmation bias right?
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 4:48 am
by Mirhawk
Aggh, pip. I meant pip.
I hate autocorrect sometimes.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 4:56 am
by itlepip
Well me having confbias doesn't make the evidence go away.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 7:11 am
by Mirhawk
Depends on how you look at it really.
It doesn't call the really call the argument into question so much as it makes your reason for finding scummy questionable.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 7:27 am
by SirCakez
>checks in
>sees lack of Pied Piper posts
>is further suspicious of said Piper
>checks out
