Mafiascum.net

In post 5537, Bell wrote:

In post 5534, Ircher wrote:Why thestatusquo? I think he has had some good takes this game. On the other hand, it's clear my reads are really bad this game.

Changed my mind. Catboi is the easier elimination and just very likely to be scum.

In post 5540, Ircher wrote:VOTE: catboi

Alright then. My claim offer still stands; however, I'm probably not doing it if I'm only asked by one or two people.

pedit: They aren't always, but there's a good correlation.

"Why is it that you suspect me of Villainy? I've only just joined the party and have no record of your journey, was it something thedid?"

No, it's that your role pm is red.

Why the roleplay is very interesting, I don't think it helps us with regards to townreading you.

Titus was a not good kill.

In post 5548, Chara wrote:

In post 5544, Bell wrote:

In post 5542, Chara wrote:i don't want to wagon kitty. he just got here. :<

and a town kitty is a useful asset.

Cool. But they replaced into a scum slot.

you'll have to convince me that was scum Fire.

Deja vu.

In post 5549, Bell wrote:It's just that the basics tell me at least one scum was off both wagons

excuse me?

In post 5555, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 5549, Bell wrote:It's just that the basics tell me at least one scum was off both wagons

excuse me?

You're excused.

In post 5519, Bell wrote:I'm not sure what to do with all this accuracy FF and Cabd have this game.

I’m sheeping them onto SS most likely today unless it changed overnight.

Ftr, I was originally gonna damage Something_Smart but White Fire struck me as the less useful of the two across the game.

In post 5549, Bell wrote:I agree that a town kitty is very useful though. I like catboi and think he's a good town player.
It's just that the basics tell me at least one scum was off both wagons and that replace outs are more likely to be scum than not. It's not a complicated read. But I find it very likely to be accurate.

there were only two players off of both wagons, Fire and notscience. i don't see why those basics apply here given almost all of the playerlist was on a wagon. Fire's slot was off the wagon because they were lurking.

i townread Fire's early game and the read kind of dropped off due to the inactivity, for context.

i think kitty will make himself very readable today if he'd like to see the morning, too.

In post 5556, Bell wrote:You're excused.

But you aren't.

Why couldn't all scum be on one of the two wagons?

God my motivation for this game is so low it hurts. I’ll try to care more tomorrow.

I could vote catboi too I’m waiting for morph to enter the thread

Also I’m an idiot but that’s just for later

In post 5549, Bell wrote:I agree that a town kitty is very useful though. I like catboi and think he's a good town player.
It's just that the basics tell me at least one scum was off both wagons and that replace outs are more likely to be scum than not. It's not a complicated read. But I find it very likely to be accurate.

"Are you...familiar with the pup of fire at all? Because such reasoning should hardly hold weight to those with any passing knowledge of his tendencies. Further, why is the lack of vote from on a wagon a sign of villainy when they appear to have gone totally absent from the game? The argument seems tenuous at best."

In post 5560, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 5556, Bell wrote:You're excused.

But you aren't.

Why couldn't all scum be on one of the two wagons?

Excuse me, but I'm town. So I'm automatically excused.

In post 5563, catboi wrote:

In post 5549, Bell wrote:I agree that a town kitty is very useful though. I like catboi and think he's a good town player.
It's just that the basics tell me at least one scum was off both wagons and that replace outs are more likely to be scum than not. It's not a complicated read. But I find it very likely to be accurate.

"Are you...familiar with the pup of fire at all? Because such reasoning should hardly hold weight to those with any passing knowledge of his tendencies. Further, why is the lack of vote from

「WHITE FIRE」

on a wagon a sign of villainy when they appear to have gone totally absent from the game? The argument seems tenuous at best."

So, you're attacking my argument.

VOTE: Something_Smart
I actually think this might be better.

It is not.

I was somewhat townreading White Fire day 1.

In post 5566, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Something_Smart
I actually think this might be better.

Elaborate on the scum equity of S_S over Catboi please.

In post 5552, Ircher wrote:Why the roleplay is very interesting, I don't think it helps us with regards to townreading you.

"I joined this adventure to have a good time, and I intend to do so regardless of what ludicrous accusations it may bring against me. A journey isn't worthwhile if you can't bring a bit of levity to it. Besides, I believe my good intentions should become perfectly clear in time regardless. If you wish for me to prove myself, tell me why you suspect me of being a Villain."

...Are you really going to start off this game with the "Debate me!" Meme?

In post 5565, Bell wrote:

In post 5563, catboi wrote:

In post 5549, Bell wrote:I agree that a town kitty is very useful though. I like catboi and think he's a good town player.
It's just that the basics tell me at least one scum was off both wagons and that replace outs are more likely to be scum than not. It's not a complicated read. But I find it very likely to be accurate.

"Are you...familiar with the pup of fire at all? Because such reasoning should hardly hold weight to those with any passing knowledge of his tendencies. Further, why is the lack of vote from

「WHITE FIRE」

on a wagon a sign of villainy when they appear to have gone totally absent from the game? The argument seems tenuous at best."

So, you're attacking my argument.

"Yes? I know your conclusion is wrong, and the reasons you have used for it are rather poor. Would you mind answering my questions?"

Bell:

In post 5560, Something_Smart wrote:Why couldn't all scum be on one of the two wagons?

In post 5569, Bell wrote:

In post 5566, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Something_Smart
I actually think this might be better.

Elaborate on the scum equity of S_S over Catboi please.

They're about equal but I'm inclined to maybe give catboi a benefit of the doubt as like I said, I was mildly town reading White Fire day 1, but I can't say the same for Something_Smart.

@catboi -- Give us some reads to work with. That's probably the most useful thing for you to do to show you are town.