Mafiascum.net

2.232 Gypyx Trial



To vote in their favor, use HEAL: Gypyx. To support the charges, use HURT: Gypyx. Gypyx will be found innocent if they receive 7 heal votes before they receive 7 hurt votes.

Heal (0):
Hurt (0):

Not voting: Everyone

The day will end in (expired on 2021-12-05 21:00:00).

Also a note that you cannot vote on your own trial!

now i go back to bed poggles

HEAL: Gypyx

Let's get this out of the way

In post 5220, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'll make a proper post later but GLB has been acquitted of witchcraft, and the masses clamor for the real witch to be brought to trial.

Is there a post missing here? Where are is the heal/hurt record? It would be helpful to see if there’s a pattern to them with both Titus and gypyx.

*yawns* Same old, same old.

In post 5599, RadiantCowbells wrote:2.232 Titus Trial

Heal (7): Good Luck Buddy, Taly, Cheeky Wings, Galron, Gamma Emerald, Sakura Hana, Not Known 15
Hurt (1): Clemency

Not voting: Others

The day will end in (expired on 2021-12-05 21:00:00).

Tiitus has been acquitted of witchcraft, and the masses clamor for the real witch to be brought to trial.

Maybe I should quote this and if it somehow gets deleted from my post, that will tell us something because clearly the identical post on GLB has been removed.

In post 5590, jjh927 wrote:5 scum in Victorine, GMo, NK15, Loftwing, Ratman, SS, listed in order of likelihood.

okay i want to say soemthing.

stop this bs right now.

you literally fucking call 3 people scum that I am/was calling scum. I still have vic/ loft / rat / clem / + 1 more in my scumsolve.

do you rlly think im fucking bussing 3 people? holy shit. its starting to get annoying because u pair me up with these other people who haven't done shit while i have.

and you have nothing on me other than that you made an assumption with me to begin with.

i will clear everything up later on.

In post 5602, jjh927 wrote:HEAL: Gypyx

Let's get this out of the way

Certainly not.
HURT: Gypyx

I think I'm going to wait for more votes before casting mine onbthiscone.

The claim is unprovable before any ELo/MeLo, they when explaining their defense of GLB.

In post 5609, Not Known 15 wrote:The claim is unprovable before any ELo/MeLo, they

lied

when explaining their defense of GLB.

Explain?

The only possible situation in which the game doesn't reach elo or melo is a town stomp

remind me of your reasoning for -scum when entering this phase, and why you feel confident kn so many slots as locktown?

In post 5609, Not Known 15 wrote:The claim is unprovable before any ELo/MeLo, they

lied

when explaining their defense of GLB.

why do you not wanna wait for that though?

also uh, i'd certainely be interested to see where the lie was

I really don't want to touch a situational IC right now so how about people case because I recall votes on him at daystart

In post 5606, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 5590, jjh927 wrote:5 scum in Victorine, GMo, NK15, Loftwing, Ratman, SS, listed in order of likelihood.

okay i want to say soemthing.

stop this bs right now.

you literally fucking call 3 people scum that I am/was calling scum. I still have vic/ loft / rat / clem / + 1 more in my scumsolve.

do you rlly think im fucking bussing 3 people? holy shit. its starting to get annoying because u pair me up with these other people who haven't done shit while i have.

and you have nothing on me other than that you made an assumption with me to begin with.

i will clear everything up later on.

Yeah you've agreed with the consensus on a lot. That doesn't mean much.

Loftwing and Ratmans are more the people I have leftover when you factor in everyone who is town.

You should not have clemency in your solve if you have been paying attention.

I'm not gonna take you out of the scumpile because you're agreeing with me on some things, particularly given my viewpoint now that I am assuming that Gypyx is town when Gypyx is specifically the consensus scumread that you decided to accuse of witchcraft over someone like, say, Victorine. Why did you choose Gypyx there over Victorine? I don't remember you stating a scumread there. It looks like you're just going along with an easy consensus elimination, and now that I am looking from this new town!Gypyx perspective it does appear you picked the consensus elimination that wasn't scum over one that probably is

In post 5614, Taly wrote:I really don't want to touch a situational IC right now so how about people case

Gypyx

because I recall votes on him at daystart

I would suspect most of the pressure on Gypyx came from me and people following me, and my case was mainly that he avoided saying he scumread GLB (and still hasn't fixed that and really should)

You definitely should be touching the situational IC aspect because that is what means you can be lazy

People might have had their own reasons but I really think we can wait and see if the IC claim is real and go find other scum

I would also note we are probably going back to the normal elim for this day phase after this nonsense is all wrapped up and we have decided who we're burning

If not then this is just blatantly a mafia aligned role

In post 5615, jjh927 wrote:

In post 5606, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 5590, jjh927 wrote:5 scum in Victorine, GMo, NK15, Loftwing, Ratman, SS, listed in order of likelihood.

okay i want to say soemthing.

stop this bs right now.

you literally fucking call 3 people scum that I am/was calling scum. I still have vic/ loft / rat / clem / + 1 more in my scumsolve.

do you rlly think im fucking bussing 3 people? holy shit. its starting to get annoying because u pair me up with these other people who haven't done shit while i have.

and you have nothing on me other than that you made an assumption with me to begin with.

i will clear everything up later on.

Yeah you've agreed with the consensus on a lot. That doesn't mean much.

Loftwing and Ratmans are more the people I have leftover when you factor in everyone who is town.

You should not have clemency in your solve if you have been paying attention.

I'm not gonna take you out of the scumpile because you're agreeing with me on some things, particularly given my viewpoint now that I am assuming that Gypyx is town when Gypyx is specifically the consensus scumread that you decided to accuse of witchcraft over someone like, say, Victorine. Why did you choose Gypyx there over Victorine? I don't remember you stating a scumread there. It looks like you're just going along with an easy consensus elimination, and now that I am looking from this new town!Gypyx perspective it does appear you picked the consensus elimination that wasn't scum over one that probably is

Listen up. I am the one who approached scumcases for most of those. I was the INITIAL one who said ratmans, clem, galron, loft were scum. I pushed that narrative. You decided to come up later and some people to and just include them in your reads because they were LHF. Did I mention Gypyx in my scumsolve? Here you go again, assuming shit. You say I shouldn't have clem in my solve -- that implies that I am not "going with the consensus" you're just a hypocritical liar. Me accusing gypyx of withccraft was the meme, since 3 people already like did it before me. I rather accuse Vic -- and I still stand by it? What is wrong with you? I already claimed vic is scum so what the fuck are you on about?

In post 5588, jjh927 wrote:Well that's easily verifiable

No it's not, what?, so he literally comes and does nothing but claim IC and we wont know if he's a real IC or not until we're already getting rekt by scum?

In post 5589, jjh927 wrote:Okay I'm good assuming you are town from now on

Okay, why arent you at least interrogating him instead of taking his IC claim at face value?

If you want to know why I don't engage with you on this very much, it's because you're very aggressive and often misrepresenting things in your favour.

You shouldn't have Clemency in your solve because Titus claimed an innocent result on Clemency. No, that doesn't imply you're not going with the consensus. Clemency WAS a consensus scumread before that.
You also don't get to imply that players are valid scumreads when you scumread them and LHF when I have them in a rather optimistically small pool for a solve. I don't particularly have any reason to believe ratmans or loftwing or SS are scum, just that I believe everyone else is town and need pressure there.

But yeah, your tone is extremely rude and reads as though you know I'm town. I'm being a massive thorn in your side and it's pretty clear by the way that you are attacking me and insulting my intelligence that you know my stance is genuine

In post 5616, jjh927 wrote:I would suspect most of the pressure on Gypyx came from me and people following me, and my case was mainly that he avoided saying he scumread GLB (and still hasn't fixed that and really should)

well, i don't scumread GLB so it's definetly gonna be hard for me to say so

In post 5620, Sakura Hana wrote:

In post 5588, jjh927 wrote:Well that's easily verifiable

No it's not, what?, so he literally comes and does nothing but claim IC and we wont know if he's a real IC or not until we're already getting rekt by scum?

In post 5589, jjh927 wrote:Okay I'm good assuming you are town from now on

Okay, why arent you at least interrogating him instead of taking his IC claim at face value?

If we end up getting rekt by scum in the universe with scum!Gypyx it's an inevitable reality whether we elim Gypyx now or later

You don't reevaluate when a consensus scumread flips scum

In post 5622, Gypyx wrote:

In post 5616, jjh927 wrote:I would suspect most of the pressure on Gypyx came from me and people following me, and my case was mainly that he avoided saying he scumread GLB (and still hasn't fixed that and really should)

well, i don't scumread GLB so it's definetly gonna be hard for me to say so

You need to say it just once for mechanical reasons even though it's false