Page 226 of 287
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:34 am
by dramonic
I'm kinda bored by the Mirhawk fuckery.
Just mislynch his ass and move on.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:36 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5599, itlepip wrote:I think Dwlee is acting too incompetent to be scum but enough to maybe look at a policy/vig at some point.
What do mean by too incompetent to be scum?
I can't see Dwlee's reads and progressions coming from town because of how little sense they make; I'm not sure that a townie views the game the way he does because it doesn't make any sort of sense at all.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:38 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5625, dramonic wrote:I'm kinda bored by the Mirhawk fuckery.
Just mislynch his ass and move on.
You have the power to fight against it, you know.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:38 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5625, dramonic wrote:I'm kinda bored by the Mirhawk fuckery.
Just mislynch his ass and move on.
You have the power to fight against it, you know.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:40 am
by The Pied Piper
Or if you're tired of waiting, you have the power to speed it along. You are more to us than just cranky grandpa dramonic.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:42 am
by drmyshottyizsik
In post 5629, The Pied Piper wrote:Or if you're tired of waiting, you have the power to speed it along. You are more to us than just cranky grandpa dramonic.
Why is there AtE is so much of what you say?
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:44 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:For the record I don't really think that there's a such a thing as starting from a blank slate here. It's almost impossible to prevent your previous opinions from tinting any new reads. This isn't really central to any actual point, I just would like to point our my opinion on that.
It's more productive when looking at objective data to try not to let those previous biases creep in or else there's no reason to look at that objective data in the first place. It's like if I was doing VCA and I called Dwlee scum every time he popped up in a group; if I am that confident about my reads, I don't need any of that in the first place.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:44 am
by The Pied Piper
Did you mean to quote that post?
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:45 am
by drmyshottyizsik
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:47 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:I just don't believe it's possible to read a bunch of ISO's without forming any kind of opinion. Period. Assigning the vales you posted in your legend necessitates having an opinion on the post in question. So no I don't think it's unreasonable to expect plot to have made some opinions.
Reading someone's post and seeing that they are scumreading someone else doesn't necessitate an opinion on the scumread.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:50 am
by The Pied Piper
Dramonic said that he was just waiting for everyone to mislynch Mirhawk and move on. I pointed out that this wasn't his only option. How was that AtE?
The second quote was a playful jab, I won't sincerely or seriously call someone a "cranky grandpa".
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 9:58 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:There's also nothing strange about you seeing where the wind is blowing. As you said there are only two wagons in play, one of them is you and the other is someone who you have recently (repeatedly) called town. You obviously can't get on either of those. I think you're looking for a new top scumread, but you're testing the waters to see what way to go. Also, you're scumreading Dram more then Cerb? Am I reading that right? Why do you spend so much time talking about Cerb and so little taking about Dram?
Why do you think that we are testing the waters to see where we should go as opposed to just posting some interactions?
Plot spent time analyzing interactions. Cerberus had more interesting interactions than Dramonic did. Interesting doesn't equal scummy. "I am thinking about something" doesn't equal "this is definitely scum".
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:00 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:If my claim that Cakez is costing is so unsubstantiated then why is it so easy to make? Also, you'll note I specifically told everyone to go back and check his ISO in a specific time frame so they could judge his behavior themselves. Have you gone back and checked him? I really want to hear it from you, do you think my claim on this is false? After rereading his recent activity do you think he isn't coasting?
He's been coasting recently. This is not a strong indicator of him being scum.
Saying someone is coasting is easy because it's based on activity (in your case) and nothing more. He has not been coasting in this game as a whole.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:00 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:If my claim that Cakez is costing is so unsubstantiated then why is it so easy to make? Also, you'll note I specifically told everyone to go back and check his ISO in a specific time frame so they could judge his behavior themselves. Have you gone back and checked him? I really want to hear it from you, do you think my claim on this is false? After rereading his recent activity do you think he isn't coasting?
He's been coasting recently. This is not a strong indicator of him being scum.
Saying someone is coasting is easy because it's based on activity (in your case) and nothing more. He has not been coasting in this game as a whole.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:00 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:If my claim that Cakez is costing is so unsubstantiated then why is it so easy to make? Also, you'll note I specifically told everyone to go back and check his ISO in a specific time frame so they could judge his behavior themselves. Have you gone back and checked him? I really want to hear it from you, do you think my claim on this is false? After rereading his recent activity do you think he isn't coasting?
He's been coasting recently. This is not a strong indicator of him being scum.
Saying someone is coasting is easy because it's based on activity (in your case) and nothing more. He has not been coasting in this game as a whole.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:01 am
by The Pied Piper
In post 5605, Mirhawk wrote:Lastly, Pips tunneling is whats making me unsure about my read. Not the other way around.
Why do you think that he's scum?
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:02 am
by drmyshottyizsik
In post 5635, The Pied Piper wrote:
Dramonic said that he was just waiting for everyone to mislynch Mirhawk and move on. I pointed out that this wasn't his only option. How was that AtE?
The second quote was a playful jab, I won't sincerely or seriously call someone a "cranky grandpa".
You are calling him to action by trying to taunt him and saying you aren't using your power and saying that you need him and he matters
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:04 am
by The Pied Piper
I didn't say that I needed him or that he mattered. I have been taunting him to action, but I'm not sure that I understand your problem with that.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:20 am
by pistachi0n
In post 5625, dramonic wrote:I'm kinda bored by the Mirhawk fuckery.
Just mislynch his ass and move on.
This is scummy
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:39 am
by dramonic
its really not pistach
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 11:01 am
by drmyshottyizsik
I think it's town upset over the bull shit
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 11:02 am
by Cerberus v666
Do you really think dram cares enough to be upset?
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 11:05 am
by drmyshottyizsik
I think he is frustrated he can't care
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 11:14 am
by dramonic
I laughed.
I mean, I do care that we're mislynching and ignoring the scum.
But the way I see it, maybe after you guys are rid of your Mirhawk boner we can start doing some real work.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 11:39 am
by Dwlee99
Honestly agreeing with dram here.