Mafiascum.net

So much stupid lie here, but i dont understand why it is so easy?!

bloodhail is a vanilla cop, he would get a vanilla result on a mafia goon.

I don't see why Andres being town would mean bloodhail has to be scum on mech because mech is stupid.

Im ok with voting between me and Ana then

Ana, you dont like me, but speak with me so much. Why didnt you talk with Dunn at all? Do you hate anime tastes of each other or what?

In post 2859, Anastasia wrote:

In post 2849, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2848, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 2438, Anastasia wrote:If I flip town should you die next?

Did you really say "if" instead of "when?"

If she flips

Thanks Dunny

the only one attempt to talk with each other

Thanks Dunny. Dead DGB.

are you really trying to use me not talking to dunnstral as some kind of scum tell when the scum team didn't even know dunnstral was their traitor to begin with?

It's really hard for me to treat you in good faith when you constantly spew nonsense.

Ok, my mistake. Hmm.

What did i miss?

Blood - andre,ana,nero,cabd,mark(?)
Andre - blood,kitty,enchant,samantha,a50(?)
Hmmm
And vasex

The strangest thing here is a50, who considers now blood town, though he was townreading andre

What this list about

bloodhail pro: more suspicious of andres, suspected by cabd and anastasia, logical targets
bloodhail neutral: claimed fake result when someone was l-2 for a decent amount of time and the votes initially had a lot of momentum; possible he was here and ready to unvote but otherwise it could be seen as covering a failed opportunity, and on the other hand it's risky for mafia to do that in general (but then that could give town points itself)
bloodhail con: sat on claim and didn't accuse andres of anything when andres claimed, claimed even-night after there was an odd-night claim, suspected by rathe

andres pro: claims roleblocked when he could just... not (unless his role isn't fruit vendor)
andres neutral: 2 mafia had votes parked on him d1, off T3 wagon despite saying he is mafia, roleblocking doesn't make sense with kitty unless roleblocker is 'night 2 night 3' variant (in neutral because that may be why t3 claimed that way)
andres con: targets don't make sense from a town mindset, ungated checks are more powerful in town hands (assuming town is supposed to glean something from it), constant ATE, slower and wavering conviction against bloodhail

even though the list for andres is more damning and I agree with enchant that it would be a 2-for-1 with kitty... rereading some of day 1 I just have to

VOTE: bloodhail

In post 5661, Enchant wrote:What this list about

This is the list of possible votes, according to opinions of players

In post 5658, Enchant wrote:What did i miss?

Do you actually read what gets posted? Or do you just constantly expect people to update you?

In post 5664, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 5658, Enchant wrote:What did i miss?

Do you actually read what gets posted? Or do you just constantly expect people to update you?

While i read some posts and flips, i don't read fully so yeah, i want update to shortly know what happened.

There was plenty of support for a cabd elimination yesterday and there should be even more support today after NDMath flips green.

I really don't see why scum!BH would need to fake a guilty result to push a cabd mis-elim - it doesn't make a lot of sense to me,

Also it makes even less sense for him to retract the guilty.

The game state feels like we're on the wrong path rn.

atm I kind of hate this game because it feels like there's 5+ mafia lol

In post 5628, KittyTacky wrote:Cabd seems like the sort of player to appeal to emotion. I don't buy that selfvote.

In post 5629, KittyTacky wrote:VOTE: Cabd

no, stop

In post 5662, samantha97 wrote:even though the list for andres is more damning and I agree with enchant that it would be a 2-for-1 with kitty... rereading some of day 1 I just have to

what

wheres mark

Mark will vote with Andre i think.

VOTE: andresvmb

zzz

In post 5671, Vasex wrote:Mark will vote with Andre i think.

What makes you say this? I don’t think Mark will vote me what.

In post 5672, samantha97 wrote:VOTE: andresvmb

zzz

Are you falling for this 2 for 1 fallacy?

How can you possibly have a list with cons for my slot and not talk about my play at all? All you mention is some AtE supposedly I’ve engaged in today. But not like 4 days of content - nothing on that.