TENET - Game Over

Brian Skies · Post Post #5675 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:15 pm

In post 5672, superbowl9 wrote:So dunn arguing that setup indicates bell is just pure bs!! WHICH IS WHAT IM SAYING

No, it's fine and I still think he's town for it.

superbowl9 · Post Post #5676 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:15 pm

Oh.
My.
God.

Hench Princesses · Post Post #5677 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:17 pm

now everyone hug!

*hug*

superbowl9 · Post Post #5678 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:17 pm

In post 5673, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 5671, superbowl9 wrote:EXACTLY SO THERE IS NO SETUP REASONING POINTING TO DUNN NOT SCUM, BELL LYING, ETC. ETC. WHICH WAS MY POINT THE WHOLE TIME
Cool. But none of this makes Dunn scum, or his setup spec scummy. So...what's your point in all this?

You agree that setup doesn't indicate scum bell

In post 5675, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 5672, superbowl9 wrote:So dunn arguing that setup indicates bell is just pure bs!! WHICH IS WHAT IM SAYING
No, it's fine and I still think he's town for it.

Yet dunn is totally fine for saying setup indicates scum bell

superbowl9 · Post Post #5679 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:18 pm

HP do you agree with my A50 + dunn/annie + pooky assessment?

superbowl9 · Post Post #5680 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:19 pm

Pooky should have a question mark there

superbowl9 · Post Post #5681 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:19 pm

Dunn and bell can't both be scum right

Brian Skies · Post Post #5682 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:20 pm

In post 5678, superbowl9 wrote:Yet dunn is totally fine for saying setup indicates scum bell

I think you're skipping a lot of steps here.

He didn't say setup spec makes Bell scum.

He just gave us a narrow pool of possibilities and said his opinion was that Bell was lying. Not the same thing.

Brian Skies · Post Post #5683 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:20 pm

In post 5680, superbowl9 wrote:Pooky should have a question mark there

Pooky turnstiled on Day 1, so it can't be him.

Brian Skies · Post Post #5684 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:21 pm

Pooky could still be scum, but not the strongman/roleblocker/etc.

superbowl9 · Post Post #5685 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:21 pm

He's trying to use setup stuff to make his argument when really he should just have a bell is lying read here. It's disingenuous

superbowl9 · Post Post #5686 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:21 pm

Also you are assuming scum is only killing on their own side which we do not know

superbowl9 · Post Post #5687 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:22 pm

Like that is wayyyyy too many assumptions about how the NKs work here

superbowl9 · Post Post #5688 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:23 pm

And I'm not looking for a strongman I'm looking for scum. We are focusing so much on this strongman stuff yet not trying to just find scum

Brian Skies · Post Post #5689 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:25 pm

In post 2, SirCakez wrote:Roles can only target Operatives in their own timestream.

Hench Princesses · Post Post #5690 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:25 pm

In post 5679, superbowl9 wrote:HP do you agree with my A50 + dunn/annie + pooky assessment?

Which assessment? I'm sure it was last page or something

superbowl9 · Post Post #5691 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:26 pm

In post 5690, Hench Princesses wrote:
In post 5679, superbowl9 wrote:HP do you agree with my A50 + dunn/annie + pooky assessment?
Which assessment? I'm sure it was last page or something

Just my read on who's scum. Do you see scum outside these slots?

superbowl9 · Post Post #5692 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:27 pm

In post 5689, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 2, SirCakez wrote:Roles can only target Operatives in their own timestream.

I mean we know this isn't true tho? Dunn literally crossed

Dunnstral · Post Post #5693 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:29 pm

In post 3108, SirCakez wrote:
Rules clarification - roles can only target Operatives in their own timestreams unless it says otherwise in the role.

My role allows me to target the other timeline.

Brian Skies · Post Post #5694 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:30 pm

In post 2, SirCakez wrote:Sator Operatives have a factional nightkill in each timestream, until the temporal pincer. Roles can only target Operatives in their own timestream.

I'm sorry. You're right. Dunn did cross, and I think I remember Cakez making a comment about it.

However, this is the actual full line which makes me believe that Cakez intends for the factional kills to only be effective in their own timestream. Or that's how I've been interpreting it.

Dunnstral · Post Post #5695 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:33 pm

In post 5693, Dunnstral wrote:My role allows me to target the other timeline.

And I can't target my own timeline, by the by

Hench Princesses · Post Post #5696 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:33 pm

In post 5691, superbowl9 wrote:Just my read on who's scum. Do you see scum outside these slots?

in terms of the start of this timeline?

There were at least 2 scum in this pool:
unwnd/Dunn, Spiffeh, Almost50, Bell, Brian Skies, PookyTheMagicalBear, Gypyx

Pooky's scum and then after that, I think Bell's town, GX is town, Spiffeh's probably scum tbh, after that I just feel nauseous and want to not play

-E

superbowl9 · Post Post #5697 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:34 pm

I think it's meant to keep protectives/investigatives working in their own timeline. Again no evidence to say crossing strongman is not likely here, but we're getting in the weeds. It really doesn't matter to me who the strongman is. Can you give me a case why bell is lying here? And didn't he claim doc after imperium flipped? If he's scum why claim that when he knows it's going to be harder to justify?

superbowl9 · Post Post #5698 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:35 pm

Oh I forgot about spiffeh, I think that does make more sense in the last slot as opposed to pooky

superbowl9 · Post Post #5699 (ISO) » Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:35 pm

They were kinda sedentary in purple room as well